Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
34161

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Deutsche Apotheker- und Ärztebank eG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2013/11/EU — Alternative dispute resolution — Article 13(1) and (2) — Mandatory information — Accessibility of information.#Case C-380/19.

cjeu_case ·
34162

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#European Commission v CX.#Appeal – Civil service – Disciplinary proceedings – Rights of defence – Right to be heard – Annex IX of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 4 – Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented – Article 22 – Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty – Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented – Assessment of the medical evidence – Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance.#Case C-131/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
34163

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#European Commission v CX.#Appeal – Civil service – Disciplinary proceedings – Rights of defence – Right to be heard – Annex IX of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 4 – Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented – Article 22 – Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty – Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented – Assessment of the medical evidence – Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance.#Case C-131/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
34164

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Gregor Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil service – Temporary staff – Internal reorganisation of the services of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) – Reassignment – Legal basis – Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Interests of the service – Substantial changes in tasks – Qualification – Transfer – Change – Misuse of power – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Right to a fair hearing – Right to effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-116/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
34165

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Gregor Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil service – Temporary staff – Internal reorganisation of the services of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) – Reassignment – Legal basis – Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Interests of the service – Substantial changes in tasks – Qualification – Transfer – Change – Misuse of power – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Right to a fair hearing – Right to effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-116/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
34166

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#A and Others v Gewestelijke stedenbouwkundige ambtenaar van het departement Ruimte Vlaanderen, afdeling Oost-Vlaanderen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2001/42/EC — Environmental impact assessment — Development consent for the installation of wind turbines — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ — Conditions for granting consent laid down by an order and a circular — Article 3(2)(a) — National instruments setting the framework for future development consent of projects — Absence of environmental assessment — Maintenance of the effects of national instruments, and consents granted on the basis of those instruments, after those instruments have been declared not to comply with EU law — Conditions.#Case C-24/19.

cjeu_case ·
34167

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#A and Others v Gewestelijke stedenbouwkundige ambtenaar van het departement Ruimte Vlaanderen, afdeling Oost-Vlaanderen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vergunningsbetwistingen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2001/42/EC — Environmental impact assessment — Development consent for the installation of wind turbines — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ — Conditions for granting consent laid down by an order and a circular — Article 3(2)(a) — National instruments setting the framework for future development consent of projects — Absence of environmental assessment — Maintenance of the effects of national instruments, and consents granted on the basis of those instruments, after those instruments have been declared not to comply with EU law — Conditions.#Case C-24/19.

cjeu_case ·
34168

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#European Union Satellite Centre v KF.#Appeal — Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) — Member of SatCen’s contract staff — Complaints of psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Request for assistance — Suspension of the staff member — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal of the staff member — SatCen’s Appeals Board — Conferral of exclusive jurisdiction in relation to SatCen staff disputes — Action for annulment — First and fifth paragraphs of Article 263 TFEU — Actions for damages — Article 268 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the EU judicature — Admissibility — Acts open to challenge — Contractual nature of the dispute — Articles 272 and 274 TFEU — Effective judicial protection — Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU — First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU — Principle of equal treatment — General Court’s obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the facts and evidence — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration.#Case C-14/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
34169

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#European Union Satellite Centre v KF.#Appeal — Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) — Member of SatCen’s contract staff — Complaints of psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Request for assistance — Suspension of the staff member — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal of the staff member — SatCen’s Appeals Board — Conferral of exclusive jurisdiction in relation to SatCen staff disputes — Action for annulment — First and fifth paragraphs of Article 263 TFEU — Actions for damages — Article 268 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the EU judicature — Admissibility — Acts open to challenge — Contractual nature of the dispute — Articles 272 and 274 TFEU — Effective judicial protection — Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU — First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU — Principle of equal treatment — General Court’s obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the facts and evidence — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration.#Case C-14/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
34170

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 25 June 2020.#Criminal proceedings against AZ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(2) – Concept of ‘executing judicial authority’ – Article 27(2) – Rule of speciality – Article 27(3)(g) and 27(4) – Derogation – Prosecution for an ‘offence other’ than that for which surrendered – Consent of the executing judicial authority – Consent of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the executing Member State.#Case C-510/19.

cjeu_case ·
34171

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 25 June 2020.#The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v Wellcome Trust Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal T(ax and Chancery Chamber).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 43 and 44 – Place of supply of services to a taxable person acting as such – Place of supply of investment management services received by a charitable organisation for a non-economic business activity from suppliers established outside the European Union.#Case C-459/19.

cjeu_case ·
34172

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 25 June 2020.#Criminal proceedings against OM.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad - Plovdiv.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to an effective remedy – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property – Directive 2014/42/EU – Freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union – National legislation providing for the confiscation, for the benefit of the State, of property used to commit the offence of smuggling – Property belonging to a third party acting in good faith.#Case C-393/19.

cjeu_case ·
34174

Case C-380/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV v Deutsche Apotheker- und Ärztebank eG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2013/11/EU — Alternative dispute resolution — Article 13(1) and (2) — Mandatory information — Accessibility of information)

cjeu_case ·
34175

Case C-131/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Commission v CX (Appeal — Civil Service — Disciplinary proceedings — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 4 — Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented — Article 22 — Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty — Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented — Assessment of medical evidence — Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance)

cjeu_case ·
34176

Case C-116/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — Gregor Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — Internal reorganisation of the services of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) — Reassignment — Legal basis — Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Interests of the service — Substantial changes in tasks — Qualification — Transfer — Change — Misuse of power — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Right to a fair hearing — Right to effective judicial protection — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

cjeu_case ·
34177

Case C-24/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vergunningsbetwistingen — Belgium) — A and Others v Gewestelijke stedenbouwkundige ambtenaar van het departement Ruimte Vlaanderen, afdeling Oost-Vlaanderen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2001/42/EC — Environmental impact assessment — Development consent for the installation of wind turbines — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ — Conditions for granting consent laid down by an order and a circular — Article 3(2)(a) — National instruments setting the framework for future development consent of projects — Absence of environmental assessment — Maintenance of the effects of national instruments, and consents granted on the basis of those instruments, after those instruments have been declared not to comply with EU law — Conditions)

cjeu_case ·
34178

Case C-14/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Union Satellite Centre v KF, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) — Member of SatCen’s contract staff — Complaints of psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Request for assistance — Suspension of the staff member — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal of the staff member — SatCen’s Appeals Board — Conferral of exclusive jurisdiction in relation to SatCen staff disputes — Action for annulment — First and fifth paragraphs of Article 263 TFEU — Action for damages — Article 268 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the EU judicature — Admissibility — Acts open to challenge — Contractual nature of the dispute — Articles 272 and 274 TFEU — Effective judicial protection — Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU — First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU — Principle of equal treatment — General Court’s obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the facts and evidence — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration)

cjeu_case ·
34179

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Siberia Oriental BV v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant variety rights — Application for amendment of the date of expiry of the Community protection of plant variety rights in respect of the Siberia variety of the species Lilium L. — Appeal before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO — Inadmissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — Effective judicial protection — Article 67(1) and Article 87 of Regulation No 2100/94 — Correction of patent mistakes — Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009.#Case T-737/18.

cjeu_case ·
34180

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Siberia Oriental BV v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant variety rights — Application for amendment of the date of expiry of the Community protection of plant variety rights in respect of the Siberia variety of the species Lilium L. — Appeal before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO — Inadmissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — Effective judicial protection — Article 67(1) and Article 87 of Regulation No 2100/94 — Correction of patent mistakes — Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009.#Case T-737/18.

cjeu_case ·