34081Case C-215/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — proceedings initiated by the Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Supply of services — Article 135(1)(l) — Exemption from VAT — Letting of immovable property — Concept of ‘immovable property’ — Exclusion — Article 47 — Place of taxable transactions — Supply of services connected with immovable property — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 — Articles 13b and 31a — Equipment cabinets — Computing centre services)cjeu_case · 2 juillet 2020
34082Case C-18/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — WM v Stadt Frankfurt am Main (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals — Conditions of detention — Article 16(1) — Detention in prison accommodation for the purpose of removal — Third-country national who poses a serious threat to public policy or public security)cjeu_case · 2 juillet 2020
34083Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 2 juillet 2020.#SC Terracult SRL contre Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara –Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Arad – Serviciul Inspecţie Fiscală Persoane Juridice 5 et ANAF Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara Serviciul de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Rectification de facture – Taxe erronément facturée – Remboursement de la taxe indûment versée – Régime de l’autoliquidation de la TVA – Transactions afférentes à une période imposable ayant déjà fait l’objet d’un contrôle fiscal – Neutralité fiscale – Principe d’effectivité – Proportionnalité.#Affaire C-835/18.cjeu_case · 2 juillet 2020
34084Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2020.#SC Terracult SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara –Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Arad – Serviciul Inspecţie Fiscală Persoane Juridice 5 and ANAF Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara Serviciul de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Invoice correction — Tax invoiced incorrectly — Refund of tax paid but not due — Reverse charge mechanism for VAT — Transactions relating to a tax period that has already been the subject of a tax inspection — Fiscal neutrality — Principle of effectiveness — Proportionality.#Case C-835/18.cjeu_case · 2 juillet 2020
34085Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 2 July 2020.#LB and Others v College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Echt-Susteren.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Limburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Aarhus Convention – Article 9(2) and (3) – Access to justice – No access to justice for the public other than the public concerned – Admissibility of the action subject to prior participation in the decision-making procedure.#Case C-826/18.cjeu_case · 2 juillet 2020
34086Case C-835/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara — Romania) — SC Terracult SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara — Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Arad — Serviciul Inspecţie Fiscală Persoane Juridice 5, ANAF Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara Serviciul de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Invoice correction — Tax invoiced incorrectly — Refund of tax paid but not due — Reverse charge mechanism for VAT — Transactions relating to a tax period that has already been the subject of a tax inspection — Fiscal neutrality — Principle of effectiveness — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 2 juillet 2020
34087Case C-294/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional (Spain) lodged on 1 July 2020 — GE Auto Service Leasing GMBH v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Centralcjeu_case · 1 juillet 2020
34088Case C-293/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Austria) lodged on 1 July 2020 — A, M v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Kirchdorfcjeu_case · 1 juillet 2020
34089Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 30 juin 2020.#Tartu Agro AS contre Commission européenne.#Référé – Aides d’État – Décision déclarant l’aide incompatible avec le marché intérieur et ordonnant sa récupération – Demande de sursis à exécution – Défaut d’urgence.#Affaire T-150/20 R.cjeu_case · 30 juin 2020
34090Order of the President of the General Court of 30 June 2020.#Tartu Agro AS v European Commission.#Application for interim measures – State aid – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Application for suspension of operation – No urgency.#Case T-150/20 R.cjeu_case · 30 juin 2020
34091Case T-402/20: Action brought on 30 June 2020 — Zippo Manufacturing and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 30 juin 2020
34092Case T-150/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 June 2020 — Tartu Agro v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation — No urgency)cjeu_case · 30 juin 2020
34093Case C-292/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 30 June 2020 — KS v Deutsche Lufthansa AGcjeu_case · 30 juin 2020
34094Case C-291/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 30 June 2020 — XQ v Deutsche Lufthansa AGcjeu_case · 30 juin 2020
34095Case C-290/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 30 June 2020 — AS Latvijas Gāze v Latvijas Republikas Saeima, Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisijacjeu_case · 30 juin 2020
34096Case C-289/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris (France) lodged on 30 June 2020 — IB v FAcjeu_case · 30 juin 2020
34097Case C-288/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire — Bobigny (France) lodged on 30 June 2020 — BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA v ZDcjeu_case · 30 juin 2020
34098Case C-287/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 30 June 2020 — EL and CP v Ryanair Designated Activity Companycjeu_case · 30 juin 2020
34099Case C-133/20: Order of the President of the Court of 30 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — European Pallet Association eV v PHZ BVcjeu_case · 30 juin 2020
34100Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 June 2020.#Airbnb Ireland UC and Airbnb Payments UK Ltd v Agenzia delle Entrate.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Letting of immovable property for periods of less than thirty days – Online property rental platform – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-723/19.cjeu_case · 30 juin 2020