Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,315 documents
33844

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2020.#KF v European Union Satellite Centre.#Action for annulment and for damages – Staff of SatCen – Members of the contract staff – Jurisdiction of the EU Courts – Common foreign and security policy – Decision to launch administrative investigations in respect of the applicant pursuant to a judgment of the General Court – Acts adversely affecting an official – Claim for interest on a sum awarded by the General Court as compensation for the harm suffered – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Action manifestly inadmissible.#Case T-619/19.

cjeu_case ·
33845

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2020.#KF v European Union Satellite Centre.#Action for annulment and for damages – Staff of SatCen – Members of the contract staff – Jurisdiction of the EU Courts – Common foreign and security policy – Decision to launch administrative investigations in respect of the applicant pursuant to a judgment of the General Court – Acts adversely affecting an official – Claim for interest on a sum awarded by the General Court as compensation for the harm suffered – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Action manifestly inadmissible.#Case T-619/19.

cjeu_case ·
33846

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 July 2020.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union word mark WONDERLAND – Earlier Benelux word mark WONDERMIX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-616/19.

cjeu_case ·
33847

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 July 2020.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union word mark WONDERLAND – Earlier Benelux word mark WONDERMIX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-616/19.

cjeu_case ·
33848

Case T-619/19: Order of the General Court of 10 July 2020 — KF v SatCen (Action for annulment and for damages — Staff of SatCen — Members of the contract staff — Jurisdiction of the EU Courts — Common foreign and security policy — Decision to launch administrative investigations in respect of the applicant pursuant to a judgment of the General Court — Acts adversely affecting an official — Claim for interest on a sum awarded by the General Court as compensation for the harm suffered — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Action manifestly inadmissible)

cjeu_case ·