33461Case T-784/18 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020 — Mellifera eV, Vereinigung für wesensgemäße Bienenhaltung v European Commission (Appeal — Aarhus Convention — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Article 2(1)(g) and Article 10(1) — Internal review of administrative acts — Limitation to measures of individual application — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1056 — Extension of the approval period of the active substance ‘glyphosate’ — Application for internal review — Measure of general application — Dismissal)cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33462Case C-742/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 — Czech Republic v European Commission, Kingdom of Sweden (Appeal — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Czech Republic — Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 — Articles 19 and 77 — Wine market — Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 — Article 33 — Support for rural development — Area-related aid — Decoupled direct aid — Cross-compliance checks — Traditional on-the-spot checks and on-the-spot checks by remote sensing — Burden of proof — One-off and flat-rate corrections — Doubts concerning the effectiveness of the checks — Risk analysis — Deficiencies)cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33463Case C-719/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Vivendi SA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications — Article 11(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Freedom and pluralism of the media — Freedom of establishment — Article 49 TFEU — Directive 2002/21/EC — Articles 15 and 16 — National legislation prohibiting an undertaking which has significant market power in a sector from establishing a ‘significant economic dimension’ in another sector — Calculation of revenues received in the electronic communications sector and the media sector — Definition of the electronic communications sector — Restriction to markets which have been subject to ex ante regulation — Account taken of the income of affiliated companies — Fixing of different income thresholds for undertakings active in the electronic communications sector)cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33464Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 3 septembre 2020.#United Parcel Service Inc. contre Commission européenne.#Taxation des dépens.#Affaire C-265/17 P-DEP.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33465Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-265/17 P-DEP.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33466Case T-552/20: Action brought on 2 September 2020 — MD v Commissioncjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33467Case T-546/20: Action brought on 2 September 2020 — Sopra Steria Benelux and Unisys Belgium v Commissioncjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33468Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2020.#IR v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Rights and obligations of officials – Secondment in the interests of the service – Article 37, first paragraph, heading (a), first indent, of the Staff Regulations – Article 38 of the Staff Regulations – Refusal to extend a secondment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Rights of the defence.#Case T-131/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33469Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2020.#IR v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Rights and obligations of officials – Secondment in the interests of the service – Article 37, first paragraph, heading (a), first indent, of the Staff Regulations – Article 38 of the Staff Regulations – Refusal to extend a secondment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Rights of the defence.#Case T-131/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33470Case T-131/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 September 2020 — IR v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Rights and obligations of officials — Secondment in the interests of the service — Article 37, first paragraph, heading (a), first indent, of the Staff Regulations — Article 38 of the Staff Regulations — Refusal to extend a secondment — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Rights of the defence)cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33471Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#mBank S.A. v PA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 8.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Jurisdiction in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which the consumer is domiciled – Article 18(2) – Proceedings brought against the consumer by the seller or supplier – Concept of ‘consumer’s domicile’ – Relevant time for determining the consumer’s domicile – Transfer of the consumer’s domicile after the conclusion of the contract and before the action is brought.#Case C-98/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33472Case C-413/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 2 September 2020 — Belgian State v LO, OG, SH, MB, JD, OP, Bluetail Flight School SA (BFS)cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33473Case C-411/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Bremen (Germany) lodged on 2 September 2020 — S v Familienkasse Niedersachsen-Bremen der Bundesagentur für Arbeitcjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33474Case C-410/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de A Coruña (Spain) lodged on 2 September 2020 — Banco Santander, SA v J.A.C. and M.C.P.R.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33475Case C-409/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso Administrativo No 1 de Pontevedra (Spain) lodged on 2 September 2020 — UN v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Pontevedracjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33476Ordonnance du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 2 septembre 2020.#DTE Systems GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Recours en annulation – Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale PedalBox + – Motif absolu de refus – Caractère descriptif – Abus de droit – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous c), du règlement (CE) no 207/2009 – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-801/19.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33477Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 September 2020.#DTE Systems GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark PedalBox + – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Misuse of rights – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Action manifestly unfounded in law.#Case T-801/19.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33478Ordonnance du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 2 septembre 2020.#European Network on Independent Living Brussels Office (ENIL Brussels Office) e.a. contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – FEDER – Programme opérationnel « Régions en croissance » – Axe prioritaire no 5 (Infrastructure sociale régionale) – Subvention visant le soutien de la désinstitutionalisation des services pour des adultes et personnes en situation de handicap – Refus de suspension de l’appel à propositions à la demande d’organisations de défense et de représentation des personnes en situation de handicap – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-613/19.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33479Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2020.#European Network on Independent Living Brussels Office (ENIL Brussels Office) and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – ERDF – Operational programme ‘Regions in Growth’ – Priority Axis 5 (Regional social infrastructure) – Grant intended to support the deinstitutionalisation of services for elderly people and people with disabilities – Refusal to suspend the call for proposals at the request of organisations for the defence and representation of people with disabilities – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-613/19.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.
33480Case T-801/19: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2020 — DTE Systems v EUIPO Speed-Buster (PedalBox +) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark PedalBox + — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Misuse of rights — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Action manifestly unfounded in law)cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2020 г.