33041Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Sergej Arbuzov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State respected the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-289/19.cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33042Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Sergej Arbuzov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State respected the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-289/19.cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33043Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Guillaume Vincenti v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – Promotion exercises 2014 to 2017 – Decision not to promote the applicant to the AST 8 grade – Right to be heard.#Case T-174/19.cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33044Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Guillaume Vincenti v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – Promotion exercises 2014 to 2017 – Decision not to promote the applicant to the AST 8 grade – Right to be heard.#Case T-174/19.cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33045Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#PE Digital GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative EU trade mark ElitePartner – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-36/19.cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33046Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#PE Digital GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative EU trade mark ElitePartner – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-36/19.cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33047Case T-869/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Tetra v EUIPO — Neusta next (Wave) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Wave — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33048Case T-738/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Clouds Sky v EUIPOEUIPO — The Cloud Networks (Wi-Fi Powered by The Cloud) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Wi-Fi Powered by The Cloud — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33049Case T-737/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Huevos Herrera Mejías v EUIPO — Montesierra (MontiSierra HUEVOS CON SABOR A CAMPO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MontiSierra HUEVOS CON SABOR A CAMPO — Earlier EU and national word marks MONTESIERRA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity between goods — Similarity between signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33050Case T-727/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Basaglia v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents concerning certain projects in the context of the eTEN programme and of the fifth and sixth framework programmes for research and technological development — Restriction of the request for access — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Overriding public interest — Obligation to carry out a specific and individual examination)cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33051Case T-677/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Polfarmex v EUIPO — Kaminski (SYRENA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark SYRENA — Genuine use of the mark — Extent of use — Proof of use — Articles 18(1) and 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33052Case T-654/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — FF v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products — Directive 2014/40/EU — Use of a photograph in a library of warnings with pictures to be used for tobacco products — Directive 2014/109/EU — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33053Case T-608/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Veronese Design Company v EUIPO — Veronese (VERONESE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark VERONESE — Earlier EU word mark VERONESE — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33054Case T-601/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Osório & Gonçalves v EUIPO — Miguel Torres (in.fi.ni.tu.de) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative EU trade mark in.fi.ni.tu.de — Earlier national word mark INFINITE — Admissibility of evidence — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) and (3) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33055Case T-557/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Seven v EUIPO (7Seven) (EU trade mark — EU figurative mark 7Seven — No request for renewal of the registration of the trade mark — Cancellation of the mark on expiry of the registration — Article 53 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Application for restitutio in integrum submitted by a licensee — Article 104(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Duty of due care)cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33056Case T-549/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Orphan medicinal products — Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Trecondi-treosulfan — Decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products — Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 — Concept of ‘satisfactory method’ — Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 — Error of law)cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33057Case T-522/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Aldi v EUIPO (BBQ BARBECUE SEASON) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark BBQ BARBECUE SEASON — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33058Case T-472/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — BASF v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use containing omega-3 acid ethyl esters — Variation of the terms of the authorisation — First paragraph of Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33059Case T-402/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Brillux v EUIPO — Synthesa Chemie (Freude an Farbe) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Freude an Farbe — Earlier EU figurative mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020
33060Case T-401/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Brillux v EUIPO — Synthesa Chemie (Freude an Farbe) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Freude an Farbe in yellow, orange, red, pink, violet, blue, turquoise, dark green, light green and anthracite — Earlier figurative EU trade mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 23 septembre 2020