Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,315 documents
32501

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 22 octobre 2020.#Sportingbet PLC et Internet Opportunity Entertainment Ltd contre Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure d’information dans le domaine des normes et réglementations techniques et des règles relatives aux services de la société de l’information – Notion de “règle technique” – Obligation des États membres de notifier à la Commission européenne tout projet de règle technique – Inopposabilité aux particuliers de la règle technique non notifiée – Inapplicabilité aux prestataires de services.#Affaire C-275/19.

cjeu_case ·
32502

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 October 2020.#Sportingbet plc and Internet Opportunity Entertainment Ltd v Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Notion of ‘technical regulation’ – Obligation on Member States to notify the European Commission of all draft technical regulations – Technical regulations which have not been notified cannot be enforced against individuals – Inapplicability to service providers.#Case C-275/19.

cjeu_case ·
32503

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 – Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 – Actibio grant agreement – Actibio project – Seventh Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Conflict of interests – Burden of proof – Time sheets – Audit report – Probative value – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-274/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
32504

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 – Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 – Actibio grant agreement – Actibio project – Seventh Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Conflict of interests – Burden of proof – Time sheets – Audit report – Probative value – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-274/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
32505

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 – Article 52 – Regulation (EC) No 2321/2002 – Decision No 1513/2002/EC – Grant agreement – Sensation project – Sixth Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Conflict of interests – Burden of proof – Time sheets – Audit report – Probative value – Principle of sound financial management – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-273/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
32506

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 – Article 52 – Regulation (EC) No 2321/2002 – Decision No 1513/2002/EC – Grant agreement – Sensation project – Sixth Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Conflict of interests – Burden of proof – Time sheets – Audit report – Probative value – Principle of sound financial management – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-273/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
32507

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 22 October 2020.#SK Telecom Co. Ltd. v Finanzamt Graz-Stadt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht, Außenstelle Graz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Determination of the place of supply of telecommunications services – Roaming of third-country nationals on mobile communications networks within the European Union – Point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 59a – Option for Member States to transfer the place of supply of telecommunications services to their territory.#Case C-593/19.

cjeu_case ·
32508

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 22 October 2020.#Frenetikexito – Unipessoal Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supplies subject to VAT – Exemptions – Article 132(1)(c) – Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions – Nutrition monitoring and advice – Sports, physical well-being and fitness activities – Concepts of a single complex supply, a supply ancillary to the main supply, and independent supplies – Criteria.#Case C-581/19.

cjeu_case ·
32509

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 22 October 2020.#European Commission v Republic of Austria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2004/18/EC – Public works contracts – Contract between a public body and a private undertaking for the lease of building not yet constructed – Article 1 – Realisation of a work corresponding to requirements specified by the tenant – Article 16 – Precluded.#Case C-537/19.

cjeu_case ·
32511

Case C-702/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 — Silver Plastics GmbH & Co. KG, Johannes Reifenhäuser Holding GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Retail food packaging market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23 — Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights — Fundamental right to a fair trial — Principle of equality of arms — Right ‘to an examination in person’ — Hearing of witnesses — Statement of reasons — Single and continuous infringement — Upper limit of fine)

cjeu_case ·
32512

Case C-275/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça — Portugal) — Sportingbet PLC, Internet Opportunity Entertainment Ltd v Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services — Notion of ‘technical regulation’ — Obligation on Member States to notify the European Commission of all draft technical regulations — Technical regulations which have not been notified cannot be enforced against individuals — Inapplicability to service providers)

cjeu_case ·
32513

Case C-274/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 — Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 — Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 — Actibio grant agreement — Actibio project — Seventh framework programme — Eligible costs — Conflict of interests — Burden of proof — Time sheets — Audit report — Probative value — Principle of proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
32514

Case C-273/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 — Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 — Article 52 — Regulation (EC) No 2321/2002 — Decision No 1513/2002/EC — Grant agreement — Sensation project — Sixth framework programme — Eligible costs — Conflict of interests — Burden of proof — Time sheets — Audit report — Probative value — Principle of good financial management — Principle of proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
32515

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 22 octobre 2020.#Ferrari SpA contre DU.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Marques – Directive 2008/95/CE – Article 12, paragraphe 1 – Usage sérieux d’une marque – Charge de la preuve – Article 13 – Preuve de l’usage “pour une partie des produits ou des services” – Marque désignant un modèle d’automobile dont la production a été arrêtée – Utilisation de la marque pour les pièces détachées ainsi que pour les services afférents à ce modèle – Utilisation de la marque pour des voitures d’occasion – Article 351 TFUE – Convention entre la République fédérale d’Allemagne et la Confédération suisse – Protection réciproque des brevets, dessins, modèles et marques.#Affaires jointes C-720/18 et C-721/18.

cjeu_case ·
32516

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 October 2020.#Ferrari SpA v DU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 12(1) – Genuine use of trade mark – Burden of proof – Article 13 – Proof of use ‘in respect of some of the goods or services’ – Trade mark covering a car model the production of which has stopped – Use of the trade mark in respect of replacement parts as well as for services relating to that model – Use of the trade mark for used vehicles – Article 351 TFEU – Convention between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Swiss Confederation – Reciprocal protection of patents, designs and trade marks.#Case C-720/18 and C-721/18.

cjeu_case ·
32517

Joined Cases C-720/18 and C–721/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Ferrari SpA v DU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 12(1) — Genuine use of trade mark — Burden of proof — Article 13 — Proof of use ‘in respect of some of the goods or services’ — Trade mark covering a car model the production of which has stopped — Use of the trade mark in respect of replacement parts as well as for services relating to that model — Use of the trade mark for used vehicles — Article 351 TFEU — Convention between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Swiss Confederation — Reciprocal protection of patents, designs and trade marks)

cjeu_case ·