32142Case T-694/20: Action brought on 18 November 2020 — Canisius v EUIPO — Beiersdorf (CCLABELLE VIENNA)cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32143Case T-692/20: Action brought on 18 November 2020 — Iliad Italia v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32144Case T-691/20: Action brought on 18 November 2020 — Kühne v Parliamentcjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32145Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#LG Electronics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark K7 – Earlier EU word mark k7 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-21/20.cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32146Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#LG Electronics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark K7 – Earlier EU word mark k7 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-21/20.cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32147Case T-21/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Staszewski (K7) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark K7 — Earlier EU word mark k7 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32148Case C-615/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 18 November 2020 — Criminal proceedings against YP and Otherscjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32149Case C-614/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus (Estonia) lodged on 18 November 2020 — AS Lux Express Estonia v Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeeriumcjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32150Case C-613/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 18 November 2020 — CS v Eurowings GmbHcjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32151Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Allergan Holdings France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA – Genuine use of the mark – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-664/19.cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32152Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Allergan Holdings France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA – Genuine use of the mark – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-664/19.cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32153Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Dermavita Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA – Genuine use of the mark – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered – Use in the form in which the mark was registered – Use with the proprietor’s consent – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-643/19.cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32154Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Dermavita Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA – Genuine use of the mark – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered – Use in the form in which the mark was registered – Use with the proprietor’s consent – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-643/19.cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32155Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-574/19.cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32156Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing fluid distribution equipment – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-574/19.cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32157Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TC CARL – Earlier national figurative mark CARL TOUCH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-378/19.cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32158Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TC CARL – Earlier national figurative mark CARL TOUCH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-378/19.cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32159Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TC CARL – Earlier national figurative mark CARL TOUCH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-377/19.cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020
32160Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TC CARL – Earlier national figurative mark CARL TOUCH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-377/19.cjeu_case · 18 novembre 2020