32121Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 November 2020.#5th AVENUE Products Trading GmbH v Hauptzollamt Singen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 29(1) and (3)(a) – Article 32(1)(c) and (5)(b) – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 157(2) – Customs valuation – Transaction value of imported goods – Concept of ‘condition of sale’ – Payment in return for the granting of an exclusive distribution right.#Case C-775/19.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32122Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 19 novembre 2020.#Procédure pénale contre ZW.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Citoyenneté de l’Union – Article 21 TFUE – Droit de libre circulation et de libre séjour sur le territoire des États membres – Incrimination pénale visant spécifiquement l’enlèvement international de mineurs – Restriction – Justification – Protection de l’enfant – Proportionnalité.#Affaire C-454/19.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32123Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2020.#Criminal proceedings against ZW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Heilbronn.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Article 21 TFEU – Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States – Criminal offence specifically concerning international child abduction – Restriction – Justification – Child protection – Proportionality.#Case C-454/19.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32124Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 19 novembre 2020.#EZ contre Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique d’asile – Directive 2011/95/UE – Conditions d’octroi du statut de réfugié – Refus d’effectuer le service militaire – Article 9, paragraphe 2, sous e) – Droit du pays d’origine ne prévoyant pas le droit à l’objection de conscience – Protection des personnes ayant fui leur pays d’origine après l’écoulement du délai d’un sursis au service militaire – Article 9, paragraphe 3 – Lien entre les motifs mentionnés à l’article 10 de cette directive et les poursuites et sanctions visées à l’article 9, paragraphe 2, sous e), de ladite directive – Preuve.#Affaire C-238/19.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32125Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2020.#EZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions for granting refugee status – Refusal to perform military service – Article 9(2)(e) – Law of the country of origin which does not provide for the right to conscience objection – Protection of persons who have fled their country of origin after the expiry of the period for suspending military service – Article 9(3) – Connection between the reasons mentioned in Article 10 of that directive and the prosecution and punishment referred to in Article 9(2)(e) of that directive – Evidence.#Case C-238/19.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32126Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 19 novembre 2020.#Service européen pour l'action extérieure (SEAE) contre Chantal Hebberecht.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Service européen pour l’action extérieure (SEAE) – Politique de rotation des fonctionnaires – Poste de chef de la délégation de l’Union européenne en Éthiopie – Décision refusant de prolonger l’affectation à ce poste – Intérêt du service – Principe d’égalité de traitement – Discrimination positive en faveur du sexe sous-représenté – Article 1er quinquies du statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-93/19 P.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32127Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2020.#European External Action Service v Chantal Hebberecht.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – European External Action Service (EEAS) – Policy of rotating officials – Position of Head of the European Union Delegation to Ethiopia – Decision refusing to extend the assignment to that position – Interests of the service – Principle of equal treatment – Positive discrimination in favour of the under-represented sex – Article 1d of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.#Case C-93/19 P.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32128Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 19 November 2020.#Association One Voice and Ligue pour la protection des oiseaux v Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Articles 5 and 8 – Prohibition of the use of any method of capture of birds – Article 9(1) – Authorisation to use, by way of derogation, a traditional method of capture of birds – Conditions – No other satisfactory solution – Preservation of that traditional method as the sole justification for the absence of an ‘other satisfactory solution’ – Selectivity of catches – National legislation authorising the capture of birds using limes.#Case C-900/19.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32129Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 19 November 2020.#AB v Olympiako Athlitiko Kentro Athinon – Spyros Louis.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Areios Pagos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Principle of equal treatment in employment and occupation – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Workers placed under a labour reserve system until termination of their contract of employment – Wage reduction and reduction or loss of severance pay – System applicable to public-sector workers close to full-time retirement – Reduction of public-sector wage costs – Article 6(1) – Legitimate social policy objective – Economic crisis.#Case C-511/19.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32130Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 19 November 2020.#WS v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Ne bis in idem principle – Article 21 TFEU – Freedom of movement of persons – Interpol red notice – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Lawfulness of the processing of personal data contained in such a notice.#Case C-505/19.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32131Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 19 November 2020.#Banco de Portugal and Others v VR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Banking supervision – Reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions – Directive 2001/24/EC – Reorganisation measure adopted by an administrative authority in the home Member State of a credit institution – Transfer of rights, assets or liabilities to a ‘bridge institution’ – Transfer back to the credit institution subject to the reorganisation measure – Article 3(2) – Lex concursus – Effect of a reorganisation measure in other Member States – Mutual recognition – Article 32 – Effects of a reorganisation measure on a pending lawsuit – Exception to the application of the lex concursus – Article 47, first paragraph, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Principle of legal certainty.#Case C-504/19.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32132Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 19 November 2020.#Proceedings brought by E.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Income tax – Income from capital – Income distributed by a resident undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) constituted in accordance with contract law – Income distributed by a UCITS established in another Member State and constituted in accordance with statute – Difference in treatment – Article 65 TFEU – Objectively comparable situations.#Case C-480/19.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32133Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 19 November 2020.#MK v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Direct taxation – Tax on capital gains from immovable property – Free movement of capital – Basis for assessment of tax – Discrimination – Option to be taxed according to the same arrangements as residents – Compliance with EU law.#Case C-388/19.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32134Case C-775/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg — Germany) — 5th AVENUE Products Trading GmbH v Hauptzollamt Singen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Community Customs Code — Article 29(1) and (3)(a) — Article 32(1)(c) and (5)(b) — Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — Article 157(2) — Customs valuation — Transaction value of imported goods — Concept of ‘condition of sale’ — Payment in return for the granting of an exclusive distribution right)cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32135Case C-454/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Heilbronn — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against ZW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the Union — Article 21 TFEU — Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States — Criminal offence specifically concerning international child abduction — Restriction — Justification — Child protection — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32136Case C-238/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover — Germany) — EZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Asylum policy — Directive 2011/95/EU — Conditions for granting refugee status — Refusal to perform military service — Article 9(2)(e) — Law of the country of origin which does not provide for the right to conscience objection — Protection of persons who have fled their country of origin after the expiry of the period for suspending military service — Article 9(3) — Connection between the reasons mentioned in Article 10 of that directive and the prosecution and punishment referred to in Article 9(2)(e) of that directive — Evidence)cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32137Case C-93/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2020 — European External Action Service v Chantal Hebberecht (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — European External Action Service (EEAS) — Policy of rotating officials — Position of Head of the European Union Delegation to Ethiopia — Decision refusing to extend the assignment to that position — Interests of the service — Principle of equal treatment — Positive discrimination in favour of the under-represented sex — Article 1d of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union)cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32138Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2020.#Criminal proceedings against B S and C A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of goods – Common organisation of the markets in the flax and hemp sector – Exceptions – Protection of public health – National legislation limiting the industrialisation and marketing of hemp solely to fibre and seeds – Cannabidiol (CBD).#Case C-663/18.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32139Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2020.#Criminal proceedings against B S and C A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel d'Aix-En-Provence.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of goods – Common organisation of the markets in the flax and hemp sector – Exceptions – Protection of public health – National legislation limiting the industrialisation and marketing of hemp solely to fibre and seeds – Cannabidiol (CBD).#Case C-663/18.cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.
32140Case C-663/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel d’Aix-en-Provence — France) — Criminal proceedings against BS, CA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of goods — Common organisation of the markets in the flax and hemp sector — Exceptions — Protection of public health — National legislation limiting the industrialisation and marketing of hemp solely to fibre and seeds — Cannabidiol (CBD))cjeu_case · 19 ноября 2020 г.