Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

32021

Case C-633/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 25 November 2020 — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v TC Medical Air Ambulance Agency GmbH

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32022

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Kerangus Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark ΑΠΛΑ! – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Equal treatment.#Case T-882/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32023

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Kerangus Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark ΑΠΛΑ! – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Equal treatment.#Case T-882/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32024

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Impera GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Flaming Forties – Earlier national figurative mark 40 FLAMING FRUITS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-875/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32025

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Impera GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Flaming Forties – Earlier national figurative mark 40 FLAMING FRUITS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-875/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32026

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Impera GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Flaming Forties – Earlier national figurative mark 40 FLAMING FRUITS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-874/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32027

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Impera GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Flaming Forties – Earlier national figurative mark 40 FLAMING FRUITS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-874/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32028

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Brasserie St Avold v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Three-dimensional sign – Shape of a dark bottle – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-862/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32029

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Brasserie St Avold v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Three-dimensional sign – Shape of a dark bottle – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-862/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32030

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Kisscolor Living GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark KISS COLOR – Earlier EU word mark KISS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Temporal application of the law.#Case T-802/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32031

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Kisscolor Living GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark KISS COLOR – Earlier EU word mark KISS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Temporal application of the law.#Case T-802/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32032

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#UI v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Expatriation allowance – Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Refusal to grant the expatriation allowance – Habitual residence – Place where the person’s main occupation is carried on – Five-year reference period.#Case T-362/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32033

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#UI v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Expatriation allowance – Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Refusal to grant the expatriation allowance – Habitual residence – Place where the person’s main occupation is carried on – Five-year reference period.#Case T-362/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32034

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BRF Singapore Foods Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark SADIA – Earlier national word mark SAIDA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-310/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32035

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BRF Singapore Foods Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark SADIA – Earlier national word mark SAIDA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-310/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32036

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BRF Singapore Foods Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Sadia – Earlier national word mark SAIDA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-309/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32037

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BRF Singapore Foods Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Sadia – Earlier national word mark SAIDA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-309/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32038

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Marco Bronckers v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Agreement between the European Community and the United Mexican States on the mutual recognition and protection of designations for spirit drinks – Documents submitted within the framework of the Joint Committee – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in respect of international relations – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party.#Case T-166/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32039

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Marco Bronckers v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Agreement between the European Community and the United Mexican States on the mutual recognition and protection of designations for spirit drinks – Documents submitted within the framework of the Joint Committee – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in respect of international relations – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party.#Case T-166/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.

32040

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Decision declaring certain expenses of a political party ineligible for a grant for the year 2017 – Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 – Prohibition of the funding of a national political party – Contribution or donation by a national political party – Principle of sound administration – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Decision granting a contribution to a political party for 2019 and making pre-funding of 100% of the maximum amount of the contribution subject to certain prior repayments – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 – Rights of defence.#Case T-107/19.

cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.