31841Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Groupe Canal + v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Television distribution – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 9 and Article 16(1) – Decision making commitments binding – Absolute territorial protection – Misuse of powers – Preliminary assessment – No obligation on the European Commission to take account of considerations relating to the application of Article 101(3) TFEU – Agreements intended to partition national markets – No obligation on the Commission to analyse the relevant national markets one by one – Proportionality – Adverse effect on the contractual rights of third parties.#Case C-132/19 P.cjeu_case · 9 декабря 2020 г.
31842Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 9 December 2020.#Natumi GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic production and labelling of organic products – Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Article 19(2) – Articles 21 and 23 – Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 – Article 27(1) – Article 28 – Annex IX, point 1.3 – Processing of organic food – Non-organic ingredients of agricultural origin – Lithothamnium calcareum alga – Powder obtained by cleaning, grinding and drying the sediment of that alga – Classification – Use in organic foodstuffs for the purpose of calcium enrichment – Authorisation – Conditions.#Case C-815/19.cjeu_case · 9 декабря 2020 г.
31843Case C-132/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 December 2020 — Groupe Canal + v European Commission, French Republic, Union des producteurs de cinéma (UPC), C More Entertainment AB, European Film Agency Directors — EFAD’s, European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Television distribution — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 9 and Article 16(1) — Decision making commitments binding — Absolute territorial protection — Misuse of powers — Preliminary assessment — No obligation on the European Commission to take account of considerations relating to the application of Article 101(3) TFEU — Agreements intended to partition national markets — No obligation on the Commission to analyse the relevant national markets one by one — Proportionality — Adverse effect on the contractual rights of third parties)cjeu_case · 9 декабря 2020 г.
31844Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Repsol, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark BASIC – Earlier national trade names basic and basic AG – Relative grounds for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Declaration of partial invalidity – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Referral of the case back to a Board of Appeal – Lack of competence of the authority referring the case – Article 1(d) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 – Cross-claim.#Case T-722/18.cjeu_case · 9 декабря 2020 г.
31845Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Repsol, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark BASIC – Earlier national trade names basic and basic AG – Relative grounds for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Declaration of partial invalidity – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Referral of the case back to a Board of Appeal – Lack of competence of the authority referring the case – Article 1(d) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 – Cross-claim.#Case T-722/18.cjeu_case · 9 декабря 2020 г.
31846Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Adraces - Associação para o Desenvolvimento da Raia Centro-Sul v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Framework partnership agreement – Local Europe Direct information centre – Termination of the contract without specifying the ground – Legal certainty – Principle of good faith – Proportionality – Observance of the contracting party’s rights and legitimate interests – Right to sound administration.#Case T-714/18.cjeu_case · 9 декабря 2020 г.
31847Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 December 2020.#Adraces - Associação para o Desenvolvimento da Raia Centro-Sul v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Framework partnership agreement – Local Europe Direct information centre – Termination of the contract without specifying the ground – Legal certainty – Principle of good faith – Proportionality – Observance of the contracting party’s rights and legitimate interests – Right to sound administration.#Case T-714/18.cjeu_case · 9 декабря 2020 г.
31848Case T-722/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2020 — Repsol v EUIPO — Basic (BASIC) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark BASIC — Earlier national trade names basic and basic AG — Relative grounds for refusal — Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Declaration of partial invalidity — Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court — Referral of the case back to a Board of Appeal — Lack of competence of the authority referring the case — Article 1(d) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 — Cross-claim)cjeu_case · 9 декабря 2020 г.
31849Case T-714/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2020 — Adraces v Commission (Arbitration clause — Framework partnership agreement — local Europe Direct information centre — Termination of the contract without specifying the ground — Legal certainty — Principle of good faith — Proportionality — Observance of the contracting party’s rights and legitimate interests — Right to sound administration)cjeu_case · 9 декабря 2020 г.
31850Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 8 December 2020.#David Price v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Order for interim relief – Area of freedom, security and justice – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Decision (EU) 2020/135 – Loss of EU citizenship – Loss of the right to vote – Municipal elections in the Member State of residence – Application for suspension of operation – No right to submit a reply – Examination of admissibility of the main action – Manifest inadmissibility of the main action.#Case C-298/20 P(R).cjeu_case · 8 декабря 2020 г.
31851Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 8 December 2020.#David Price v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Order for interim relief – Area of freedom, security and justice – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Decision (EU) 2020/135 – Loss of EU citizenship – Loss of the right to vote – Municipal elections in the Member State of residence – Application for suspension of operation – No right to submit a reply – Examination of admissibility of the main action – Manifest inadmissibility of the main action.#Case C-298/20 P(R).cjeu_case · 8 декабря 2020 г.
31852Case C-670/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ráckevei Járásbíróság (Hungary) lodged on 8 December 2020 — EP and Others v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt.cjeu_case · 8 декабря 2020 г.
31853Case C-669/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 8 December 2020 — Veridos GmbH v Ministar na vatreshnite raboti na Republika Bulgaria, Mühlbauer ID Services GmbH — S&Tcjeu_case · 8 декабря 2020 г.
31854Case C-668/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 8 December 2020 — Y GmbH v Hauptzollamtcjeu_case · 8 декабря 2020 г.
31855Ordonnance de rectification du 8 décembre 2020.#Konsumentombudsmannen contre Mezina AB.#Rectification d’arrêt.#Affaire C-363/19 REC.cjeu_case · 8 декабря 2020 г.
31856Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 December 2020.#Criminal proceedings against A and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European investigation order – Directive 2014/41/EU – Article 1(1) – Article 2(c)(i) and (ii) – Concepts of ‘judicial authority’ and ‘issuing authority’ – European investigation order issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State – Independence from the executive.#Case C-584/19.cjeu_case · 8 декабря 2020 г.
31857Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 December 2020.#Criminal proceedings against A and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Strafsachen Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European investigation order – Directive 2014/41/EU – Article 1(1) – Article 2(c)(i) and (ii) – Concepts of ‘judicial authority’ and ‘issuing authority’ – European investigation order issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State – Independence from the executive.#Case C-584/19.cjeu_case · 8 декабря 2020 г.
31858Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 8 December 2020.#Powiat Ostrowski v Ubezpieczeniowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Ostrowie Wielkopolskim.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 3, first paragraph – Obligation to take out a contract of insurance – Scope – Local government authority which has acquired a vehicle by judicial means – Registered vehicle which is on private land and intended to be destroyed.#Case C-383/19.cjeu_case · 8 декабря 2020 г.
31859Case C-584/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Strafsachen Wien — Austria) — Criminal proceedings against A and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European investigation order — Directive 2014/41/EU — Article 1(1) — Article 2(c)(i) and (ii) — Concepts of ‘judicial authority’ and ‘issuing authority’ — European investigation order issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Independence from the executive)cjeu_case · 8 декабря 2020 г.
31860Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2020.#Oliver Spieker v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Representation of the parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice – Lawyer – Third party status in relation to the applicant.#Case C-455/18 P.cjeu_case · 8 декабря 2020 г.