31781Case C-674/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium) lodged on 10 December 2020 — Airbnb Ireland UC v Région de Bruxelles-Capitalecjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31782Case C-672/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 10 December 2020 — L GmbH v FKcjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31783Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 10 December 2020.#TR v Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Hamburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant – Article 4a(1) – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Grounds for optional non-execution – Exceptions – Mandatory execution – Sentence handed down in absentia – Absconding of the accused person – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Articles 8 and 9 – Right to be present at the trial – Requirements in the event of a conviction in absentia – Verification upon surrender of the person sentenced.#Case C-416/20 PPU.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31784Case C-220/20: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ufficio del Giudice di Pace di Lanciano — Italy) — XX v OO (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State of national health emergency — Continuity of judicial activity — Postponement of hearings — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the reference for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31785Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#Rot Front OAO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Procedure – Taxation of costs – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-63/19 DEP.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31786Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#Rot Front OAO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Procedure – Taxation of costs – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-63/19 DEP.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31787Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 10 décembre 2020.#A. B. et B. B. contre Personal Exchange International Limited.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (CE) no 44/2001 – Article 15, paragraphe 1 – Compétence en matière de contrats conclus par les consommateurs – Notion de “consommateur” – Contrat de jeux de poker conclu en ligne entre une personne physique et un organisateur de jeux de hasard – Personne physique gagnant sa vie aux jeux de poker en ligne – Connaissances possédées par cette personne – Régularité de l’activité.#Affaire C-774/19.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31788Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#A. B. and B. B. v Personal Exchange International Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Article 15(1) – Jurisdiction over consumer contracts – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Poker-playing contract concluded online between a natural person and an organiser of games of chance – Natural person earning a living from online poker games – Knowledge of that person – Regularity of the activity.#Case C-774/19.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31789Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 10 décembre 2020.#Euromin Holdings (Cyprus) Limited.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Droit des sociétés – Directive 2004/25/CE – Offre publique d’acquisition – Article 5, paragraphe 4, premier et deuxième alinéas – Protection des actionnaires minoritaires – Offre obligatoire d’acquisition – Méthode de calcul de la valeur des actions pour déterminer le prix équitable – Pouvoir de modification du prix équitable – Exceptions au mode de calcul standard dans des circonstances et selon des critères clairement déterminés – Responsabilité de l’État membre concerné – Préjudice subi par l’offrant résultant d’une offre de prix trop élevée.#Affaire C-735/19.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31790Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#Euromin Holdings (Cyprus) Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Request for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Directive 2004/25/EC – Takeover bid – first and second subparagraphs of Article 5(4) – Protection of minority shareholders – Mandatory bid – Method of calculating the value of shares in order to determine the equitable price – Power to adjust the equitable price – Exceptions to the standard method of calculation in circumstances and in accordance with criteria that are clearly determined – Liability of the Member State concerned – Damage suffered by the offeror as a result of an excessively high bid.#Case C-735/19.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31791Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v D.-H. T. as liquidator of J & S Service UG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 23 – Restrictions to the data subject’s rights – Significant financial interest – Enforcement of civil law claims – National legislation referring to the provisions of EU law – Tax data concerning a legal person – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-620/19.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31792Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v D.-H. T. as liquidator of J & S Service UG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 23 – Restrictions to the data subject’s rights – Significant financial interest – Enforcement of civil law claims – National legislation referring to the provisions of EU law – Tax data concerning a legal person – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-620/19.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31793Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 10 décembre 2020.#M.S. e.a. contre Minister for Justice and Equality.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique d’asile – Procédure d’octroi et de retrait du statut de réfugié – Directive 2005/85/CE – Article 25, paragraphe 2 – Motifs d’irrecevabilité – Rejet par un État membre d’une demande de protection internationale comme étant irrecevable en raison de l’octroi antérieur au demandeur d’une protection subsidiaire dans un autre État membre – Règlement (CE) no 343/2003 – Règlement (UE) no 604/2013.#Affaire C-616/19.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31794Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#M.S. and Others v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Procedure for granting and withdrawing refugee status – Directive 2005/85/EC – Article 25(2) – Grounds for inadmissibility – Rejection by one Member State of an application for international protection as inadmissible due to the earlier grant to the applicant of subsidiary protection in another Member State – Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013.#Case C-616/19.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31795Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Energy efficiency – Directive 2012/27/EU – Article 9(3) – Heating, cooling and hot water consumption – Installation of individual consumption meters in buildings.#Case C-347/19.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31796Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Energy efficiency – Directive 2012/27/EU – Article 9(3) – Heating, cooling and hot water consumption – Installation of individual consumption meters in buildings.#Case C-347/19.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31797Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 10 décembre 2020.#Comune di Milano contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Secteur du transport aérien – Services d’assistance en escale aux aéroports de Milan-Linate (Italie) et de Milan-Malpensa (Italie) – Injections de capitaux effectuées par le gestionnaire de ces aéroports dans sa filiale détenue à 100 % fournissant ces services – Actionnariat public du gestionnaire – Décision déclarant ces mesures d’aides d’État illégales et incompatibles avec le marché intérieur – Article 107, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Notions de “ressources d’État”, de “mesure imputable à l’État” et d’“avantage économique” – Principe de l’opérateur privé – Critère de l’investisseur privé – Charge de la preuve – Appréciations économiques complexes – Intensité du contrôle juridictionnel – Dénaturation d’éléments de preuve.#Affaire C-160/19 P.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31798Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#Comune di Milano v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Air transport sector – Ground handling services at Milan-Linate and Milan-Malpensa airports (Italy) – Injections of capital by the company managing those airports into its wholly owned subsidiary providing those services – Public ownership of the managing company – Decision declaring those State aid measures unlawful and incompatible with the internal market – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concepts of ‘State resources’, ‘measure imputable to the State’ and ‘economic advantage’ – Private operator principle – Private investor test – Burden of proof – Complex economic assessments – Intensity of judicial review – Distortion of evidence.#Case C-160/19 P.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31799Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 10 December 2020.#Proceedings brought by A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Directive 2006/43/EC – Statutory audit of annual and consolidated accounts – Article 22a(1)(a) – Recruitment of a statutory auditor by an audited entity – Waiting period – Prohibition on taking up a key management post in the audited entity – Infringement – Gravity and duration of the infringement – Expression ‘taking up a post’ – Scope – Conclusion of an employment contract with the audited entity – Independence of statutory auditors – External appearance.#Case C-950/19.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020
31800Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 10 December 2020.#„TEAM POWER EUROPE“ EOOD v Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite - Varna.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Varna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Migrant workers – Social security – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 12(1) – Posting of workers – Temporary agency workers – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(2) – A1 certificate – Determination of the Member State in which the employer normally carries out its activities – Concept of ‘substantial activities, other than purely internal management activities’ – No assignment of temporary agency workers in the territory of the Member State in which the employer is established.#Case C-784/19.cjeu_case · December 10, 2020