31581Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Appeal – Civil service – Members of the contract staff – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) – Fixed-term contract – Decision not to renew – New decision adopted following an annulment by the General Court – Irregularities allegedly committed during the implementation of the General Court judgment.#Case C-601/19 P.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31582Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Appeal – Civil service – Members of the contract staff – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) – Fixed-term contract – Decision not to renew – New decision adopted following an annulment by the General Court – Irregularities allegedly committed during the implementation of the General Court judgment.#Case C-601/19 P.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31583Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Syndicat interprofessionnel de défense du fromage Morbier v Société Fromagère du Livradois SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs – Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 – Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Article 13(1)(d) – Practice liable to mislead the consumer as to the true origin of the product – Reproduction of the shape or appearance of a product which has a protected name – Protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Morbier’.#Case C-490/19.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31584Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Syndicat interprofessionnel de défense du fromage Morbier v Société Fromagère du Livradois SAS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs – Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 – Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Article 13(1)(d) – Practice liable to mislead the consumer as to the true origin of the product – Reproduction of the shape or appearance of a product which has a protected name – Protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Morbier’.#Case C-490/19.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31585Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#Appeal – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 – Harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products – Harmonised standards and technical regulations – Harmonised standards EN 14342:2013, EN 14904:2006, EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 and EN 12285-2:2005 – Action for annulment.#Joined Cases C-475/19 P and C-688/19 P.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31586Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#Appeal – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 – Harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products – Harmonised standards and technical regulations – Harmonised standards EN 14342:2013, EN 14904:2006, EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 and EN 12285-2:2005 – Action for annulment.#Joined Cases C-475/19 P and C-688/19 P.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31587Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#WEG Tevesstraße contre Finanzamt Villingen-Schwenningen.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Exonération en faveur de l’affermage et de la location de biens immeubles – Réglementation nationale exonérant de la TVA la livraison de chaleur par un groupement de propriétaires de logements aux propriétaires faisant partie de ce groupement.#Affaire C-449/19.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31588Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#WEG Tevesstraße v Finanzamt Villingen-Schwenningen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemption for leasing and letting immovable property – National legislation exempting from VAT the supply of heat by an association of residential property owners to property owners belonging to that association.#Case C-449/19.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31589Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. et Inpost S.A. contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Article 106, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Services d’intérêt économique général (SIEG) – Encadrement de l’Union européenne – Application aux aides d’État sous forme de compensations de service public – Secteur postal – Directive 97/67/CE – Article 7 – Compensation du coût net résultant des obligations de service universel – Décision déclarant l’aide compatible avec le marché intérieur.#Affaires jointes C-431/19 P et C-432/19 P.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31590Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. and Inpost S.A. v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 106(2) TFEU – Services of general economic interest (SGEIs) – EU framework – Application to State aid in the form of public service compensation – Postal sector – Directive 97/67/EC – Article 7 – Compensation for the net cost arising from universal service obligations – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market.#Joined Cases C-431/19 P and C-432/19 P.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31591Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#République française contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonds européen agricole de garantie (FEAGA) et Fonds européen agricole pour le développement rural (Feader) – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2017/2014 – Dépenses exclues du financement de l’Union européenne – Dépenses effectuées par la République française – Correction forfaitaire au taux de 100 % – Proportionnalité – Lignes directrices de la Commission européenne relatives au calcul des corrections financières dans le cadre des procédures d’apurement de conformité et d’apurement des comptes.#Affaire C-404/19 P.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31592Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#French Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2014 – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the French Republic – 100% flat-rate correction – Proportionality – European Commission Guidelines on the calculation of the financial corrections in the framework of the conformity and financial clearance of accounts procedures.#Case C-404/19 P.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31593Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Proceedings relating to the extradition of BY.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Extradition of a Union citizen to a third State – Person acquiring Union citizenship after transferring the centre of his or her interests to the Member State from which extradition is requested – Scope of EU law – Prohibition on extradition applied solely to own nationals – Restriction on freedom of movement – Justification based on the prevention of impunity – Proportionality – Information to the Member State of which the requested person is a national – Obligation on the Member State from which extradition is requested and the Member State of origin to ask the third State requesting extradition to send the criminal investigation file – No obligation.#Case C-398/19.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31594Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Proceedings relating to the extradition of BY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Extradition of a Union citizen to a third State – Person acquiring Union citizenship after transferring the centre of his or her interests to the Member State from which extradition is requested – Scope of EU law – Prohibition on extradition applied solely to own nationals – Restriction on freedom of movement – Justification based on the prevention of impunity – Proportionality – Information to the Member State of which the requested person is a national – Obligation on the Member State from which extradition is requested and the Member State of origin to ask the third State requesting extradition to send the criminal investigation file – No obligation.#Case C-398/19.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31595Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#Bundeszentralamt für Steuern contre Y-GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Remboursement de la TVA – Directive 2008/9/CE – Article 8, paragraphe 2, sous d) – Article 15 – Indication du numéro de la facture – Demande de remboursement.#Affaire C-346/19.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31596Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Bundeszentralamt für Steuern v Y-GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Refund of VAT – Directive 2008/9/EC – Article 8(2)(d) – Article 15 – Indication of number of the invoice – Refund application.#Case C-346/19.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31597Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Fabio De Masi and Yanis Varoufakis v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Access to European Central Bank (ECB) documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – Article 4(3) – Exceptions – Document received by the ECB – Opinion from an external service provider – Internal use as part of deliberations and preliminary consultations – Refusal to grant access.#Case C-342/19 P.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31598Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Fabio De Masi and Yanis Varoufakis v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Access to European Central Bank (ECB) documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – Article 4(3) – Exceptions – Document received by the ECB – Opinion from an external service provider – Internal use as part of deliberations and preliminary consultations – Refusal to grant access.#Case C-342/19 P.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31599Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Centraal Israëlitisch Consistorie van België e.a. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of animals at the time of killing – Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 – Article 4(1) – Obligation to stun animals before they are killed – Article 4(4) – Derogation in the context of ritual slaughter – Article 26(2) – Power of Member States to adopt national rules aimed at ensuring more extensive protection of animals in the case of ritual slaughter – Interpretation – National legislation requiring, in the case of ritual slaughter, stunning which is reversible and cannot cause death – Article 13 TFEU – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 10 – Freedom of religion – Freedom to manifest religion – Limitation – Proportionality – Lack of consensus among the Member States of the European Union – Discretion afforded to Member States – Principle of subsidiarity – Validity – Differing treatment of ritual slaughter and the killing of animals during hunting or recreational fishing activities and cultural or sporting events – No discrimination – Articles 20, 21 and 22 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case C-336/19.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.
31600Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Centraal Israëlitisch Consistorie van België e.a. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of animals at the time of killing – Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 – Article 4(1) – Obligation to stun animals before they are killed – Article 4(4) – Derogation in the context of ritual slaughter – Article 26(2) – Power of Member States to adopt national rules aimed at ensuring more extensive protection of animals in the case of ritual slaughter – Interpretation – National legislation requiring, in the case of ritual slaughter, stunning which is reversible and cannot cause death – Article 13 TFEU – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 10 – Freedom of religion – Freedom to manifest religion – Limitation – Proportionality – Lack of consensus among the Member States of the European Union – Discretion afforded to Member States – Principle of subsidiarity – Validity – Differing treatment of ritual slaughter and the killing of animals during hunting or recreational fishing activities and cultural or sporting events – No discrimination – Articles 20, 21 and 22 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case C-336/19.cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.