Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
31190

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 January 2021.#UF v Partena, Assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants ASBL and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Decision to refer – Insufficient information as to the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-105/20.

cjeu_case ·
31191

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 January 2021.#UF v Partena, Assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants ASBL and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunal du travail de Nivelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Decision to refer – Insufficient information as to the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-105/20.

cjeu_case ·
31192

Case C-105/20: Order of the Court of 21 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Nivelles — Belgium) — UF v Partena, Assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants ASBL, Institut national d’assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants (Inasti), Union Nationale des Mutualités Libres (Partenamut) (UNMLibres) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Decision to refer — Insufficient information as to the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

cjeu_case ·
31194

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 21 janvier 2021.#Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) contre BT.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Égalité de traitement entre hommes et femmes en matière de sécurité sociale – Directive 79/7/CEE – Article 4, paragraphe 1 – Départ volontaire et anticipé à la retraite – Pension de retraite anticipée – Éligibilité – Montant de la pension à percevoir devant être au moins égal au montant minimum légal – Proportion des travailleurs de chaque sexe exclus du bénéfice d’une retraite anticipée – Justification d’un éventuel désavantage particulier pour les travailleurs féminins – Objectifs de la politique sociale de l’État membre concerné.#Affaire C-843/19.

cjeu_case ·
31195

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 January 2021.#Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) v BT.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security – Directive 79/7/EEC – Article 4(1) – Voluntary early retirement – Early retirement pension – Eligibility – Requirement for the pension amount to be received to be at least as much as the legal minimum amount – Proportion of workers of each sex excluded from the benefit of early retirement – Justification of a potential particular disadvantage to female workers – Social policy objectives of the Member State concerned.#Case C-843/19.

cjeu_case ·
31196

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 21 janvier 2021.#UCMR – ADA Asociaţia pentru Drepturi de Autor a Compozitorilor contre Asociatia culturala „Suflet de Român“.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous c), article 24, paragraphe 1, et article 25, sous a) – Opérations imposables – Rémunérations pour la communication au public d’œuvres musicales – Article 28 – Organisme de gestion collective des droits d’auteur – Perception de ces rémunérations auprès de l’utilisateur final en son nom et pour le compte des titulaires de droits d’auteur.#Affaire C-501/19.

cjeu_case ·
31197

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 January 2021.#UCMR – ADA Asociaţia pentru Drepturi de Autor a Compozitorilor v Asociatia culturala „Suflet de Român“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c), Article 24(1) and Article 25(a) – Taxable transactions – Fees for the public performance of musical works – Article 28 – Collective copyright management organisation – Collection of those fees in its own name and on behalf of copyright holders from end users.#Case C-501/19.

cjeu_case ·
31198

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 January 2021.#Consiliul Concurenţei v Whiteland Import Export SRL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Penalties imposed by the national competition authority – Limitation period – Actions interrupting the limitation period – National legislation precluding, after the initiation of an investigation, the possibility that subsequent action for the purpose of proceedings or investigation may interrupt the new limitation period – Principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25(3) – Scope – Article 4(3) TEU – Article 101 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-308/19.

cjeu_case ·
31199

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 January 2021.#Consiliul Concurenţei v Whiteland Import Export SRL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Penalties imposed by the national competition authority – Limitation period – Actions interrupting the limitation period – National legislation precluding, after the initiation of an investigation, the possibility that subsequent action for the purpose of proceedings or investigation may interrupt the new limitation period – Principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25(3) – Scope – Article 4(3) TEU – Article 101 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-308/19.

cjeu_case ·
31200

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 21 January 2021.#CS and Finanzamt Österreich, Dienststelle Graz-Stadt v Finanzamt Österreich, Dienststelle Judenburg Liezen and technoRent International GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 90 – Reduction of the taxable amount – Article 183 – Refund of excess VAT – Default interest – No national rule – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Direct effect of provisions of EU law – Principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law.#Case C-844/19.

cjeu_case ·