Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,315 documents
30901

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#El Corte Inglés, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark PANTHÉ – Earlier national word and figurative marks PANTHER and earlier EU figurative mark P PANTHER – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark.#Case T-117/20.

cjeu_case ·
30902

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#El Corte Inglés, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark PANTHÉ – Earlier national word and figurative marks PANTHER and earlier EU figurative mark P PANTHER – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark.#Case T-117/20.

cjeu_case ·
30903

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#Biochange Group GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark medical beauty research – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Consideration of the facts – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-98/20.

cjeu_case ·
30904

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#Biochange Group GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark medical beauty research – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Consideration of the facts – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-98/20.

cjeu_case ·
30909

Case T-117/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — MKR Design (PANTHÉ) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark PANTHÉ — Earlier national word and figurative marks PANTHER and earlier EU figurative mark P PANTHER — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark)

cjeu_case ·
30910

Case T-98/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Biochange Group v EUIPO — mysuperbrand (medical beauty research) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark medical beauty research — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Consideration of the facts — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
30913

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#Sophia Group v European Parliament.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Provision of assistance services for buildings – Rejection of a tenderer’s offer – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Selection criteria – Award criteria – Most economically advantageous tender – Use of labels and certifications in the formulation of award criteria – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-578/19.

cjeu_case ·
30914

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#Sophia Group v European Parliament.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Provision of assistance services for buildings – Rejection of a tenderer’s offer – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Selection criteria – Award criteria – Most economically advantageous tender – Use of labels and certifications in the formulation of award criteria – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-578/19.

cjeu_case ·
30915

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 February 2021.#Mario Forte v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Single statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions – Adjustment of the amount of pensions for Italian national deputies – Corresponding amendment by the European Parliament of the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Competence of the author of the act – Obligation to state reasons – Acquired rights – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Right to property – Proportionality – Equal treatment.#Case T-519/19.

cjeu_case ·
30916

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 February 2021.#Mario Forte v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Single statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions – Adjustment of the amount of pensions for Italian national deputies – Corresponding amendment by the European Parliament of the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Competence of the author of the act – Obligation to state reasons – Acquired rights – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Right to property – Proportionality – Equal treatment.#Case T-519/19.

cjeu_case ·
30917

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 February 2021.#Giacomo Santini and Others v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Single statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Resolution No 14/2018, on pensions – Alteration of the amount of the pensions of Italian national Members of Parliament – Corresponding alteration by the European Parliament of the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Competence of the author of the act – Obligation to state reasons – Acquired rights – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Right to property – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Joined Cases T-345/19, T-346/19, T-364/19 to T-366/19, T-372/19 to T-375/19 and T-385/19.

cjeu_case ·
30918

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 February 2021.#Giacomo Santini and Others v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Single statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Resolution No 14/2018, on pensions – Alteration of the amount of the pensions of Italian national Members of Parliament – Corresponding alteration by the European Parliament of the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Competence of the author of the act – Obligation to state reasons – Acquired rights – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Right to property – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Joined Cases T-345/19, T-346/19, T-364/19 to T-366/19, T-372/19 to T-375/19 and T-385/19.

cjeu_case ·
30919

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#Dalokay Şanli v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, groups and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-157/19.

cjeu_case ·
30920

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#Dalokay Şanli v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, groups and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-157/19.

cjeu_case ·