Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
30866

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Petr Fryč v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – State aid – Block exemption regulations – Aid programme granted by the Czech authorities in favour of certain undertakings – Commission decision approving that programme – Action for annulment dismissed as being out of time – Damage allegedly caused by acts of the Commission and the EU Courts – Limitation period – Action in part manifestly inadmissible – Causal link – Action in part manifestly unfounded in law.#Case T-92/20.

cjeu_case ·
30867

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Petr Fryč v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – State aid – Block exemption regulations – Aid programme granted by the Czech authorities in favour of certain undertakings – Commission decision approving that programme – Action for annulment dismissed as being out of time – Damage allegedly caused by acts of the Commission and the EU Courts – Limitation period – Action in part manifestly inadmissible – Causal link – Action in part manifestly unfounded in law.#Case T-92/20.

cjeu_case ·
30869

Case T-92/20: Order of the General Court of 11 February 2021 — Fryč v Commission (Non-contractual liability — State aid — Block exemption regulations — Aid programme granted by the Czech authorities in favour of certain undertakings — Commission decision approving that programme — Action for annulment dismissed as being out of time — Damage allegedly caused by acts of the Commission and the EU Courts — Limitation period — Action in part manifestly inadmissible — Causal link — Action in part manifestly unfounded in law)

cjeu_case ·
30870

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 February 2021.#Anne-Marie Klose v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-600/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
30871

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 February 2021.#Anne-Marie Klose v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-600/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
30872

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Raiffeisen Bank lnternational AG (Spółka Akcyjna) v UI and MB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Prohibition of abuse of a dominant position – Unfair trading conditions – Mortgage loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency and concluded between a bank and the members of an undertaking – Act void – Time-barred legal proceedings – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Content of the request for a preliminary ruling – Insufficient information concerning the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-329/20.

cjeu_case ·
30873

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Raiffeisen Bank lnternational AG (Spółka Akcyjna) v UI and MB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Prohibition of abuse of a dominant position – Unfair trading conditions – Mortgage loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency and concluded between a bank and the members of an undertaking – Act void – Time-barred legal proceedings – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Content of the request for a preliminary ruling – Insufficient information concerning the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-329/20.

cjeu_case ·
30874

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 11 février 2021.#Procédure pénale contre K. M.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique commune de la pêche – Règlement (CE) no 1224/2009 – Régime de contrôle afin d’assurer le respect des règles de la politique commune de la pêche – Utilisation à bord d’un navire de pêche d’un appareil permettant la classification automatique par taille de poissons – Article 89 – Mesures visant à assurer le respect des règles – Article 90 – Sanctions pénales – Principe de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-77/20.

cjeu_case ·
30875

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Criminal proceedings against K. M.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 – Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy – Use on board a fishing vessel of equipment which is capable of automatically grading fish by size – Article 89 – Measures to ensure compliance – Article 90 – Criminal sanctions – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-77/20.

cjeu_case ·
30876

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 11 February 2021.#PI.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Westminster Magistrates’ Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of a criminal prosecution on the basis of a detention order issued by the same authority – No judicial review prior to surrender of the requested person – Consequences – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-648/20 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
30877

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 11 February 2021.#Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Jumbocarry Trading GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – First subparagraph of Article 22(6), read in conjunction with Article 29 – Communication of the grounds to the person concerned before taking a decision which would adversely affect that person – Article 103(1) and Article 103(3)(b) – Limitation of the customs debt – Period for notification of the customs debt – Suspension of the period – Article 124(1)(a) – Extinguishment of the customs debt where it is time-barred – Temporal application of the provision governing the grounds for suspension – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-39/20.

cjeu_case ·
30878

Case C-77/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — Ireland) — Criminal proceedings against K. M. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 — Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy — Use on board a fishing vessel of equipment which is capable of automatically grading fish by size — Article 89 — Measures to ensure compliance — Article 90 — Criminal sanctions — Principle of proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
30880

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Katoen Natie Bulk Terminals NV and General Services Antwerp NV v Belgische Staat and Middlegate Europe NV v Ministerraad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Carrying out of port activities – Dockers – Access to the profession and recruitment – Arrangements for the recognition of dockers – Dockers not part of the quota of workers provided for in national legislation – Limitation of the duration of the work contract – Mobility of dockers between different port areas – Workers carrying out logistical work – Safety certificate – Overriding reasons in the public interest – Safety in port areas – Protection of workers – Proportionality.#Joined Cases C-407/19 and C-471/19.

cjeu_case ·