Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
30763

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 February 2021.#Liga Nacional de Fútbol Profesional v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark El Clasico – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Lack of distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-809/19.

cjeu_case ·
30764

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 February 2021.#Liga Nacional de Fútbol Profesional v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark El Clasico – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Lack of distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-809/19.

cjeu_case ·
30765

Case T-809/19: Judgment of the General Court of 24 February 2021 — Liga Nacional de Fútbol Profesional v EUIPO (El Clasico) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark El Clasico — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
30766

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2021.#M and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid and T.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum and immigration – Directive 2008/115/EC – Articles 3, 4, 6 and 15 – Refugee staying illegally in the territory of a Member State – Detention for the purpose of transfer to another Member State – Refugee status in that other Member State – Principle of non-refoulement – No return decision – Applicability of Directive 2008/115.#Case C-673/19.

cjeu_case ·
30767

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2021.#M and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid and T.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum and immigration – Directive 2008/115/EC – Articles 3, 4, 6 and 15 – Refugee staying illegally in the territory of a Member State – Detention for the purpose of transfer to another Member State – Refugee status in that other Member State – Principle of non-refoulement – No return decision – Applicability of Directive 2008/115.#Case C-673/19.

cjeu_case ·
30768

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2021.#Agenzia delle Dogane v Silcompa SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 76/308/EEC – Articles 6 and 8 and Article 12(1) to (3) – Mutual assistance for the recovery of certain claims – Excise duty payable in two Member States for the same transactions – Directive 92/12/EC – Articles 6 and 20 – Release of products for consumption – Falsification of the accompanying administrative document – Offence or irregularity committed in the course of movement of products subject to excise duty under a duty suspension arrangement – Irregular departure of products from a suspension arrangement – ‘Duplication of the tax claim’ relating to the excise duties – Review carried out by the courts of the Member State in which the requested authority is situated – Refusal of the request for assistance made by the competent authorities of another Member State – Conditions.#Case C-95/19.

cjeu_case ·
30769

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2021.#Agenzia delle Dogane v Silcompa SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 76/308/EEC – Articles 6 and 8 and Article 12(1) to (3) – Mutual assistance for the recovery of certain claims – Excise duty payable in two Member States for the same transactions – Directive 92/12/EC – Articles 6 and 20 – Release of products for consumption – Falsification of the accompanying administrative document – Offence or irregularity committed in the course of movement of products subject to excise duty under a duty suspension arrangement – Irregular departure of products from a suspension arrangement – ‘Duplication of the tax claim’ relating to the excise duties – Review carried out by the courts of the Member State in which the requested authority is situated – Refusal of the request for assistance made by the competent authorities of another Member State – Conditions.#Case C-95/19.

cjeu_case ·
30770

Case C-673/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — M, A, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, T (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Asylum and immigration — Directive 2008/115/EC — Articles 3, 4, 6 and 15 — Refugee staying illegally in the territory of a Member State — Detention for the purpose of transfer to another Member State — Refugee status in that other Member State — Principle of non-refoulement — No return decision — Applicability of Directive 2008/115)

cjeu_case ·
30771

Case C-95/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Agenzia delle Dogane v Silcompa SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 76/308/EEC — Articles 6 and 8 and Article 12(1) to (3) — Mutual assistance for the recovery of certain claims — Excise duty payable in two Member States for the same transactions — Directive 92/12/EC — Articles 6 and 20 — Release of products for consumption — Falsification of the accompanying administrative document — Offence or irregularity committed in the course of movement of products subject to excise duty under a duty suspension arrangement — Irregular departure of products from a suspension arrangement — ‘Duplication of the tax claim’ relating to the excise duties — Review carried out by the courts of the Member State in which the requested authority is situated — Refusal of the request for assistance made by the competent authorities of another Member State — Conditions)

cjeu_case ·
30774

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 24 February 2021.#Anthony Braesch and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Aid for the precautionary restructuring of Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena – Preliminary examination stage – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Plea of inadmissibility – Status as an interested party – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility.#Case T-161/18.

cjeu_case ·
30775

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 24 February 2021.#Anthony Braesch and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Aid for the precautionary restructuring of Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena – Preliminary examination stage – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Plea of inadmissibility – Status as an interested party – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility.#Case T-161/18.

cjeu_case ·
30776

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 24 February 2021.#Universität Koblenz-Landau v Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Tempus IV Programmes – Grant agreements – Contractual nature of the dispute – Reclassification of the action – Eligible costs – Systemic and recurrent irregularities – Full repayment of amounts paid – Proportionality – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-108/18.

cjeu_case ·
30778

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 24 February 2021.#Universität Koblenz-Landau v Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Tempus IV Programmes – Grant agreements – Contractual nature of the dispute – Reclassification of the action – Eligible costs – Systemic and recurrent irregularities – Full repayment of amounts paid – Proportionality – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-108/18.

cjeu_case ·