30461Case C-165/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from Københavns Byret (Denmark) lodged on 11 March 2021 — Orion Corporation v Lægemiddelstyrelsencjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30462Case C-163/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil 7 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 11 March 2021 — AD and Others v PACCAR Inc, DAF TRUCKS NV, DAF Trucks Deutschland GmbHcjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30463Case C-162/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 11 March 2021 — Pesticide Action Network Europe ASBL, Nature et Progrès Belgique ASBL, TN v État belge, represented by the Ministre des Classes moyennes, des Indépendants, des P.M.E., de l’Agriculture et de l’Intégration sociale, chargé des Grandes villescjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30464Case C-159/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 11 March 2021 — GM v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság and Otherscjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30465Case C-158/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 11 March 2021 — Ministerio Fiscal, Abogacía del Estado, Partido político VOX v Lluís Puig Gordi, Carles Puigdemont Casamajó, Antoni Comín Oliveres, Clara Ponsatí Obiols, Meritxell Serret Aleu, Marta Rovira Vergés, Anna Gabriel Sabatécjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30466Case C-157/21: Action brought on 11 March 2021 — Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Unioncjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30467Case C-156/21: Action brought on 11 March 2021 — Hungary v European Parliament and Council of the European Unioncjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30468Ordonnance du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 11 mars 2021.#Techniplan Srl contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation et en indemnité – FED – Article 76, sous d), du règlement de procédure – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-426/20.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30469Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 March 2021.#Techniplan Srl v European Commission.#Case T-426/20.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30470Case T-426/20: Order of the General Court of 11 March 2021 — Techniplan v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — EDF — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Failure to comply with procedural requirements — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30471Case T-162/20: Order of the General Court of 11 March 2021 — UPL Europe and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) v EFSAcjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30472Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 11 mars 2021.#M. A. contre État belge.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2008/115/CE – Article 5 – Décision de retour – Père d’un enfant mineur, citoyen de l’Union européenne – Prise en compte de l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant lors de l’adoption de la décision de retour.#Affaire C-112/20.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30473Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 March 2021.#M. A. v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 5 – Return decision – Father of a minor child who is a citizen of the European Union – Taking into account the best interests of the child at the time of the adoption of the return decision.#Case C-112/20.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30474Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 11 March 2021.#XK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Procura della Repubblica di Trento.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ – Criteria – Procura della Repubblica di Trento (Public Prosecutor’s Office, Trento, Italy) – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-66/20.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30475Case C-591/20: Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Reprensus GmbH v S-V Pavlovi Trejd EOODcjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30476Case C-112/20: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — M. A. v État belge (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2008/115/EC — Article 5 — Return decision — Father of a minor child who is a citizen of the European Union — Taking into account the best interests of the child at the time of the adoption of the return decision)cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30477Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 11 mars 2021.#Danske Bank A/S, Danmark, Sverige Filial, contre Skatteverket.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 9 – Assujetti – Notion – Article 11 – Groupement TVA Établissement principal et succursale d’une société situés dans deux États membres différents – Établissement principal relevant d’un groupement TVA dont ne fait pas partie la succursale – Établissement principal fournissant des services à la succursale et lui imputant les coûts de ces services.#Affaire C-812/19.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30478Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 March 2021.#Danske Bank A/S, Danmark, Sverige Filial v Skatteverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 9 – Taxable person – Concept – Article 11 – VAT group ‐Principal establishment and branch of a company situated in two different Member States – Principal establishment forming part of a VAT group to which the branch does not belong – Principal establishment providing services to the branch and imputing to it the costs of those services.#Case C-812/19.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30479Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 11 mars 2021.#Firma Z contre Finanzamt Y.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 90, paragraphe 1 – Réduction de la base d’imposition – Principes définis dans l’arrêt du 24 octobre 1996, Elida Gibbs (C‑317/94, EU:C:1996:400) – Livraisons de médicaments – Octroi de rabais – Caractère hypothétique de la question préjudicielle – Irrecevabilité de la demande de décision préjudicielle.#Affaire C-802/19.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30480Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 March 2021.#Firma Z v Finanzamt Y.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 90(1) – Reduction of the taxable amount – Principles laid down in the judgment of 24 October 1996, Elida Gibbs (C‑317/94, EU:C:1996:400) – Supplies of medicinal products – Granting of discounts – Hypothetical nature of the question referred – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-802/19.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.