Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
30081

Case C-108/20: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Berlin-Brandenburg — Germany) — HR v Finanzamt Wilmersdorf (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 167 and 168 — Right to deduct input VAT — Refusal — Fraud — Supply chain — Refusal of the right to deduct where the taxable person knew or should have known that, by his or her purchase, he or she was participating in a transaction connected to VAT fraud)

cjeu_case ·
30082

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Multiple application for registration of Community designs representing gymnastic and sports apparatus and equipment – Right of priority – Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty – Article 4 of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property – Priority period.#Case T-579/19.

cjeu_case ·
30083

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Multiple application for registration of Community designs representing gymnastic and sports apparatus and equipment – Right of priority – Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty – Article 4 of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property – Priority period.#Case T-579/19.

cjeu_case ·
30084

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Romania v European Commission.#Cohesion Fund and ERDF – Article 139(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – Temporal application of an increased co-financing rate adopted after submission of the final application for an interim payment but before acceptance of the accounts – Legitimate expectation – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration.#Case T-543/19.

cjeu_case ·
30085

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Romania v European Commission.#Cohesion Fund and ERDF – Article 139(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – Temporal application of an increased co-financing rate adopted after submission of the final application for an interim payment but before acceptance of the accounts – Legitimate expectation – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration.#Case T-543/19.

cjeu_case ·
30086

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Crédit lyonnais v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 4(1)(d) and Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Calculation of the leverage ratio – ECB’s partial refusal to authorise the exclusion of exposures meeting certain conditions – Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Failure to examine all the relevant aspects of the individual case – Res judicata – Article 266 TFEU.#Case T-504/19.

cjeu_case ·
30087

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Crédit lyonnais v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 4(1)(d) and Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Calculation of the leverage ratio – ECB’s partial refusal to authorise the exclusion of exposures meeting certain conditions – Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Failure to examine all the relevant aspects of the individual case – Res judicata – Article 266 TFEU.#Case T-504/19.

cjeu_case ·
30088

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Achema AB and Lifosa AB v European Commission.#State aid – Market in electricity generated from renewable energy sources – Operating aid – Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market at the end of the preliminary examination stage – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Infringement of procedural rights – 2008 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection – 2014 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Article 30 TFEU – Article 110 TFEU – Body of consistent evidence.#Case T-300/19.

cjeu_case ·
30089

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Achema AB and Lifosa AB v European Commission.#State aid – Market in electricity generated from renewable energy sources – Operating aid – Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market at the end of the preliminary examination stage – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Infringement of procedural rights – 2008 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection – 2014 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Article 30 TFEU – Article 110 TFEU – Body of consistent evidence.#Case T-300/19.

cjeu_case ·
30090

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria Srl v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Grant agreement – The MARSOL Project – Eligible costs – OLAF investigation report finding certain expenses incurred to be ineligible – Repayment of sums paid – Burden of proof – Principle of good faith – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Proportionality.#Case T-285/19.

cjeu_case ·
30091

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria Srl v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Grant agreement – The MARSOL Project – Eligible costs – OLAF investigation report finding certain expenses incurred to be ineligible – Repayment of sums paid – Burden of proof – Principle of good faith – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Proportionality.#Case T-285/19.

cjeu_case ·
30096

Case T-504/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Crédit Lyonnais v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Article 4(1)(d) and Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Calculation of the leverage ratio — ECB’s partial refusal to authorise the exclusion of exposures meeting certain conditions — Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Failure to examine all the relevant aspects of the individual case — Res judicata — Article 266 TFEU)

cjeu_case ·
30097

Case T-300/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Achema and Lifosa v Commission (State aid — Market in electricity generated from renewable energy sources — Operating aid — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market at the end of the preliminary examination stage — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Infringement of procedural rights — 2008 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection — 2014 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 — Article 30 TFEU — Article 110 TFEU — Body of consistent evidence)

cjeu_case ·
30098

Case T-285/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria v Commission (Arbitration clause — Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Grant agreement — The MARSOL Project — Eligible costs — OLAF investigation report finding certain expenses incurred to be ineligible — Repayment of sums paid — Burden of proof — Principle of good faith — Right to be heard — Principle of sound administration — Rights of the defence — Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
30100

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#XU and Others v SC Credit Europe Ipotecar IFN SA and Credit Europe Bank NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Unfair terms – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 1(2) – Exclusion from the scope of that directive of contractual terms which reflect mandatory provisions of national law – Article 4(2) – Exception to the assessment of whether a term is unfair – Credit agreement denominated in a foreign currency – Alleged infringement of the obligation of information borne by a seller or supplier – Examination to be carried out by the national court as a matter of priority in the light of Article 1(2).#Case C-364/19.

cjeu_case ·