30041Case C-694/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 April 2021 — Italmobiliare SpA, Sirap-Gema SpA, Sirap France SAS, Petruzalek GmbH, Petruzalek s.r.o., Petruzalek s.r.o. and Petruzalek kft v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Retail food packaging market — Attributability of unlawful conduct — Conditions for the granting of immunity — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Sales value — Upper limit of the fine — Duration of the administrative procedure — Reasonable time — Ability to pay)cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30042Case C-593/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Außenstelle Graz) — Austria) — SK Telecom Co. Ltd v Finanzamt Graz-Stadt (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Determination of the place of supply of telecommunications services — Roaming of third-country nationals on mobile communications networks within the European Union — Point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 59a — Option for Member States to transfer the place of supply of telecommunications services to their territory)cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30043Case C-515/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Eutelsat SA v Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes, Inmarsat Ventures SE, formerly Inmarsat Ventures Ltd (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Telecommunications sector — Harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 2 GHz frequency bands for bringing into operation systems providing mobile satellite services — Decision No 626/2008/EC — Article 2(2)(a) and (b) — Article 4(1)(c)(ii) — Article 7(1) and (2) — Article 8(1) and (3) — Mobile satellite systems — Concept of ‘mobile earth station’ — Concept of ‘complementary ground components’ — Concept of ‘required quality’ — Respective role of satellite and ground components — Requirement for a selected operator of mobile satellite systems to provide service for a certain percentage of the population and territory — Non-compliance — Effect)cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30044Case C-511/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Areios Pagos — Greece) — AB v Olympiako Athlitiko Kentro Athinon — Spyros Louis (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2000/78/EC — Principle of equal treatment in employment and occupation — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age — Workers placed under a labour reserve system until termination of their contract of employment — Wage reduction and reduction or loss of severance pay — System applicable to public-sector workers close to full-time retirement — Reduction of public-sector wage costs — Article 6(1) — Legitimate social policy objective — Economic crisis)cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30045Case C-470/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd v Commissioner for Environmental Information (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Aarhus Convention — Directive 2003/4/EC — Right of access to environmental information held by public authorities — Article 2, point 2 — Notion of ‘public authority’ — Bodies or institutions when acting in a judicial or legislative capacity — Information in the file of closed court proceedings)cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30046Case C-221/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku — Poland) — AV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA — Article 8(2) and (4): — Article 17(1) and (2) — Article 19 — Taking into account, for the purposes of an aggregate sentence, of a conviction delivered in another Member State, which must be enforced in the Member State in which that judgment is delivered — Conditions — Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA — Article 3(3) — Concept of ‘interference with a sentence or its execution’ which must be taken into account in the event of new criminal proceedings initiated in a Member State other than that in which the ruling was delivered)cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30047Case C-194/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — H. A. v État belge (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection — Article 27 — Remedy — Whether account should be taken of circumstances subsequent to the transfer decision — Effective judicial protection)cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30048Case C-30/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen — Sweden) — Diskrimineringsombudsmannen v Braathens Regional Aviation AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin — Directive 2000/43/EC — Article 7 — Protection of rights — Article 15 — Sanctions — Action for compensation based on an allegation of discrimination — Defendant acquiescing to claim for compensation without recognition on its part of the discrimination alleged — Connection between the compensation paid and the discrimination alleged — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to effective judicial protection — National procedural rules preventing the court seised from ruling on whether there was discrimination as alleged, despite the express request of the claimant)cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30049Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 15 avril 2021.#Federazione nazionale delle imprese elettrotecniche ed elettroniche (Anie) e.a. et Athesia Energy Srl e.a. contre Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico et Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Articles 16 et 17 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Principes de sécurité juridique et de protection de la confiance légitime – Traité sur la Charte de l’énergie – Article 10 – Applicabilité – Directive 2009/28/CE – Article 3, paragraphe 3, sous a) – Promotion de l’utilisation de l’énergie produite à partir de sources renouvelables – Production d’énergie électrique à partir d’installations solaires photovoltaïques – Modification d’un régime d’aide.#Affaires jointes C-798/18 et C-799/18.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30050Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Federazione nazionale delle imprese elettrotecniche ed elettroniche (Anie) and Others and Athesia Energy Srl and Others v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of legal certainty and of the protection of legitimate expectations – Energy Charter Treaty – Article 10 – Applicability – Directive 2009/28/EC – Article 3(3)(a) – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Production of electricity from solar photovoltaic installations – Alteration of a support scheme.#Joined Cases C-798/18 and C-799/18.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30051Joined Cases C-798/18 and C-799/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 April 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Federazione nazionale delle imprese elettrotecniche ed elettroniche (Anie) and Others (C-798/18), Athesia Energy Srl and Others (C-799/18) v Ministero dello Sviluppo economico and Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA (References for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Principles of legal certainty and of the protection of legitimate expectations — Energy Charter Treaty — Article 10 — Applicability — Directive 2009/28/EC — Article 3(3)(a) — Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources — Production of electricity from solar photovoltaic installations — Alteration of a support scheme)cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30052Case T-204/21: Action brought on 14 April 2021 — Stryker v EUIPO (RUGGED)cjeu_case · April 14, 2021
30053Case C-243/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 14 April 2021 — TOYA Sp. z o.o., Polska Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznejcjeu_case · April 14, 2021
30054Case C-241/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 14 April 2021 — I.L. v Politsei- ja Piirivalveametcjeu_case · April 14, 2021
30055Case C-240/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg (Germany) lodged on 14 April 2021 — SA and Others v Daimler AGcjeu_case · April 14, 2021
30056Case C-239/21 P: Appeal brought on 14 April 2021 by Petr Fryč against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 11 February 2021 in Case T-92/20 Fryč v Commissioncjeu_case · April 14, 2021
30057Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#ZU v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Civil service – Officials – Request for information – Rejection of a complaint – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Action manifestly inadmissible.#Case T-462/20.cjeu_case · April 14, 2021
30058Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#ZU v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Civil service – Officials – Request for information – Rejection of a complaint – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Action manifestly inadmissible.#Case T-462/20.cjeu_case · April 14, 2021
30059Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Finnish air-transport market – Aid granted by Finland to Finnair amid the Covid‑19 pandemic – State guarantee on a loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Failure to weigh up the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-388/20.cjeu_case · April 14, 2021
30060Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Finnish air transport market – Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – State guarantee on a loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-388/20.cjeu_case · April 14, 2021