30001Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Kingdom of the Netherlands v Council of the European Union and European Parliament.#Action for annulment – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 – Conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources – Protection of marine ecosystems – Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 – Technical measures – Annex V, Part D – Ban on fishing by vessels using electric pulse trawls – Principle of proportionality – Precautionary principle.#Case C-733/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30002Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Kingdom of the Netherlands v Council of the European Union and European Parliament.#Action for annulment – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 – Conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources – Protection of marine ecosystems – Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 – Technical measures – Annex V, Part D – Ban on fishing by vessels using electric pulse trawls – Principle of proportionality – Precautionary principle.#Case C-733/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30003Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 15 avril 2021.#TKF contre Department of Justice for Northern Ireland.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière d’obligations alimentaires – Règlement (CE) no 4/2009 – Champ d’application ratione temporis – Article 75 – Décisions rendues par une juridiction d’un État membre avant l’adhésion à l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-729/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30004Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#TKF v Department of Justice for Northern Ireland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters relating to maintenance obligations – Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 – Temporal scope – Article 75 – Decisions given by a court of a Member State prior to accession to the European Union.#Case C-729/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30005Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Italmobiliare SpA and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Retail food packaging market – Attributability of unlawful conduct – Conditions for the granting of immunity – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Sales value – Upper limit of the fine – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable time – Ability to pay.#Case C-694/19 P.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30006Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Italmobiliare SpA and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Retail food packaging market – Attributability of unlawful conduct – Conditions for the granting of immunity – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Sales value – Upper limit of the fine – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable time – Ability to pay.#Case C-694/19 P.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30007Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 15 avril 2021.#SK Telecom Co. Ltd. contre Finanzamt Graz-Stadt.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Détermination du lieu des prestations de services de télécommunication – Itinérance de ressortissants de pays tiers sur les réseaux de communication mobile au sein de l’Union européenne – Article 59 bis, premier alinéa, sous b) – Possibilité pour les États membres de déplacer le lieu des prestations de services de télécommunication sur leur territoire.#Affaire C-593/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30008Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#SK Telecom Co. Ltd. v Finanzamt Graz-Stadt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht, Außenstelle Graz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Determination of the place of supply of telecommunications services – Roaming of third-country nationals on mobile communications networks within the European Union – Point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 59a – Option for Member States to transfer the place of supply of telecommunications services to their territory.#Case C-593/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30009Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Eutelsat SA v Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes (ARCEP) and Inmarsat Ventures SE.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Telecommunications sector – Harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 2 GHz frequency bands for bringing into operation systems providing mobile satellite services – Decision No 626/2008/EC – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Article 4(1)(c)(ii) – Article 7(1) and (2) – Article 8(1) and (3) – Mobile satellite systems – Concept of ‘mobile earth station’ – Concept of ‘complementary ground components’ – Concept of ‘required quality’ – Respective role of satellite and ground components – Requirement for a selected operator of mobile satellite systems to provide service for a certain percentage of the population and territory – Non-compliance – Effect.#Case C-515/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30010Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Eutelsat SA v Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes (ARCEP) and Inmarsat Ventures SE.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Telecommunications sector – Harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 2 GHz frequency bands for bringing into operation systems providing mobile satellite services – Decision No 626/2008/EC – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Article 4(1)(c)(ii) – Article 7(1) and (2) – Article 8(1) and (3) – Mobile satellite systems – Concept of ‘mobile earth station’ – Concept of ‘complementary ground components’ – Concept of ‘required quality’ – Respective role of satellite and ground components – Requirement for a selected operator of mobile satellite systems to provide service for a certain percentage of the population and territory – Non-compliance – Effect.#Case C-515/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30011Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 15 avril 2021.#AB contre Olympiako Athlitiko Kentro Athinon – Spyros Louis.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2000/78/CE – Principe d’égalité de traitement en matière d’emploi et de travail – Interdiction de discrimination fondée sur l’âge – Travailleurs placés dans une réserve de main-d’œuvre jusqu’à la résiliation de leur contrat de travail – Réduction salariale et réduction ou perte d’indemnité de licenciement – Régime applicable aux travailleurs du secteur public proches du départ à la retraite à taux plein – Réduction des dépenses salariales du secteur public – Article 6, paragraphe 1 – Objectif légitime de politique sociale – Situation de crise économique.#Affaire C-511/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30012Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#AB v Olympiako Athlitiko Kentro Athinon – Spyros Louis.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Areios Pagos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Principle of equal treatment in employment and occupation – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Workers placed under a labour reserve system until termination of their contract of employment – Wage reduction and reduction or loss of severance pay – System applicable to public-sector workers close to full-time retirement – Reduction of public-sector wage costs – Article 6(1) – Legitimate social policy objective – Economic crisis.#Case C-511/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30013Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd v Commissioner for Environmental Information.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Right of access to environmental information held by public authorities – Article 2, point 2 – Notion of ‘public authority’ – Bodies or institutions when acting in a judicial or legislative capacity – Information in the file of closed court proceedings.#Case C-470/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30014Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd v Commissioner for Environmental Information.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Right of access to environmental information held by public authorities – Article 2, point 2 – Notion of ‘public authority’ – Bodies or institutions when acting in a judicial or legislative capacity – Information in the file of closed court proceedings.#Case C-470/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30015Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#AV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 8(2) and (4): – Article 17(1) and (2) – Article 19 – Taking into account, for the purposes of an aggregate sentence, of a conviction delivered in another Member State, which must be enforced in the Member State in which that judgment is delivered – Conditions – Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA – Article 3(3) – Concept of ‘interference with a sentence or its execution’ which must be taken into account in the event of new criminal proceedings initiated in a Member State other than that in which the ruling was delivered.#Case C-221/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30016Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#AV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 8(2) and (4): – Article 17(1) and (2) – Article 19 – Taking into account, for the purposes of an aggregate sentence, of a conviction delivered in another Member State, which must be enforced in the Member State in which that judgment is delivered – Conditions – Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA – Article 3(3) – Concept of ‘interference with a sentence or its execution’ which must be taken into account in the event of new criminal proceedings initiated in a Member State other than that in which the ruling was delivered.#Case C-221/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30017Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#H. A. v État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 27 – Remedy – Whether account should be taken of circumstances subsequent to the transfer decision – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-194/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30018Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#H. A. v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 27 – Remedy – Whether account should be taken of circumstances subsequent to the transfer decision – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-194/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30019Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Diskrimineringsombudsmannen v Braathens Regional Aviation AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Article 7 – Protection of rights – Article 15 – Sanctions – Action for compensation based on an allegation of discrimination – Defendant acquiescing to claim for compensation without recognition on its part of the discrimination alleged – Connection between the compensation paid and the discrimination alleged – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to effective judicial protection – National procedural rules preventing the court seised from ruling on whether there was discrimination as alleged, despite the express request of the claimant.#Case C-30/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021
30020Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Diskrimineringsombudsmannen v Braathens Regional Aviation AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Article 7 – Protection of rights – Article 15 – Sanctions – Action for compensation based on an allegation of discrimination – Defendant acquiescing to claim for compensation without recognition on its part of the discrimination alleged – Connection between the compensation paid and the discrimination alleged – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to effective judicial protection – National procedural rules preventing the court seised from ruling on whether there was discrimination as alleged, despite the express request of the claimant.#Case C-30/19.cjeu_case · April 15, 2021