Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
29727

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 29 April 2021.#Allergan Holdings France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-41/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
29728

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 29 April 2021.#Allergan Holdings France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-41/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
29729

Case C-277/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 29 April 2021 — Secrétariat général de l’Enseignement catholique ASBL (SeGEC), Fédération des Établissements libres subventionnés indépendants ASBL (FELSI), Groupe scolaire Don Bosco à Woluwe-Saint-Lambert ASBL, École fondamentale libre de Chênée ASBL, Collège Saint-Guibert de Gembloux ASBL, Collège Saint-Benoît de Maredsous ASBL, Pouvoir Organisateur des Centres PMS libres à Woluwe ASBL v Institut des Comptes nationaux (ICN), Banque nationale de Belgique

cjeu_case ·
29734

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 April 2021.#X.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant – Grounds for optional non-execution – Article 4(5) – Requested person has been finally judged in a third State in respect of the same acts – Sentence has been served or may no longer be executed under the law of the sentencing country – Implementation – Margin of discretion of the executing judicial authority – Concept of ‘same acts’ – Remission of sentence granted by a non-judicial authority as part of a general leniency measure.#Case C-665/20 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
29735

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 April 2021.#X.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant – Grounds for optional non-execution – Article 4(5) – Requested person has been finally judged in a third State in respect of the same acts – Sentence has been served or may no longer be executed under the law of the sentencing country – Implementation – Margin of discretion of the executing judicial authority – Concept of ‘same acts’ – Remission of sentence granted by a non-judicial authority as part of a general leniency measure.#Case C-665/20 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
29737

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 April 2021.#AR v Stadt Pforzheim.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Driving licences – Mutual recognition – Withdrawal of the licence in the territory of a Member State other than the issuing Member State – Affixing of an endorsement to the driving licence indicating that it is not valid within that Member State.#Case C-56/20.

cjeu_case ·
29740

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 29 avril 2021.#I.W. et R.W. contre Bank BPH S.A.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Effets de la constatation du caractère abusif d’une clause – Contrat de prêt hypothécaire libellé dans une devise étrangère – Détermination du taux de change entre les devises – Contrat de novation – Effet dissuasif – Obligations du juge national – Article 6, paragraphe 1, et article 7, paragraphe 1.#Affaire C-19/20.

cjeu_case ·