29501Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 18 May 2021.#Embutidos Monells, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-59/21 P.cjeu_case · 18 mai 2021
29502Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 18 May 2021.#Embutidos Monells, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-59/21 P.cjeu_case · 18 mai 2021
29503Case C-311/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 18 May 2021 — CM v TimePartner Personalmanagement GmbHcjeu_case · 18 mai 2021
29504Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 18 mai 2021.#Skatteverket contre Skellefteå Industrihus AB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Fiscalité – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Déduction de la taxe payée en amont lors de la phase de construction d’un bâtiment – Régime d’assujettissement optionnel – Abandon de l’activité initialement envisagée – Régularisation de la déduction de la taxe payée en amont – Réponse à la question préjudicielle pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence.#Affaire C-248/20.cjeu_case · 18 mai 2021
29505Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2021.#Skatteverket v Skellefteå Industrihus AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Deduction of the input tax paid during the stage of construction of a building – Optional tax liability scheme – Abandonment of the initially planned activity – Adjustment of the deduction of the input tax paid – Reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law.#Case C-248/20.cjeu_case · 18 mai 2021
29506Case C-248/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Skatteverket v Skellefteå Industrihus AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Deduction of the input tax paid during the stage of construction of a building — Optional tax liability scheme — Abandonment of the initially planned activity — Adjustment of the deduction of the input tax paid — Reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law)cjeu_case · 18 mai 2021
29507Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 May 2021.#Fluctus s.r.o. and Others v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions – Gambling – Dual system of organisation of the market – Monopoly on lottery products and casino games – Prior authorisation for the use of automatic gaming machines – Advertising practices of the monopolist – Criteria for assessment – Constitutional case-law finding the national legislation to be compatible with EU law.#Case C-920/19.cjeu_case · 18 mai 2021
29508Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 May 2021.#Fluctus s.r.o. and Others v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions – Gambling – Dual system of organisation of the market – Monopoly on lottery products and casino games – Prior authorisation for the use of automatic gaming machines – Advertising practices of the monopolist – Criteria for assessment – Constitutional case-law finding the national legislation to be compatible with EU law.#Case C-920/19.cjeu_case · 18 mai 2021
29509Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 May 2021.#Asociaţia 'Forumul Judecătorilor din România' and Others v Inspecţia Judiciară and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Treaty of Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union – Act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania – Articles 37 and 38 – Appropriate measures – Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption – Decision 2006/928/EC – Legal nature and effects of the cooperation and verification mechanism and of the reports established by the Commission on the basis of that mechanism – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Laws and government emergency ordinances adopted in Romania in the course of 2018 and 2019 concerning the organisation of the judicial system and the liability of judges – Interim appointment to management positions of the Judicial Inspectorate – Establishment of a section within the Public Prosecutor’s Office for the investigation of offences committed within the judicial system – Financial liability of the State and personal liability of judges in the event of judicial error.#Joined Cases C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19, C-355/19 and C-397/19.cjeu_case · 18 mai 2021
29510Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 May 2021.#Asociaţia 'Forumul Judecătorilor din România' and Others v Inspecţia Judiciară and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from theTribunalul Olt and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Treaty of Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union – Act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania – Articles 37 and 38 – Appropriate measures – Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption – Decision 2006/928/EC – Legal nature and effects of the cooperation and verification mechanism and of the reports established by the Commission on the basis of that mechanism – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Laws and government emergency ordinances adopted in Romania in the course of 2018 and 2019 concerning the organisation of the judicial system and the liability of judges – Interim appointment to management positions of the Judicial Inspectorate – Establishment of a section within the Public Prosecutor’s Office for the investigation of offences committed within the judicial system – Financial liability of the State and personal liability of judges in the event of judicial error.#Joined Cases C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19, C-355/19 and C-397/19.cjeu_case · 18 mai 2021
29511Case C-920/19: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Fluctus s.r.o., Fluentum s.r.o., KI v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 56 TFEU — Freedom to provide services — Restrictions — Gambling — Dual system of organisation of the market — Monopoly on lottery products and casino games — Prior authorisation for the use of automatic gaming machines — Advertising practices of the monopolist — Criteria for assessment — Constitutional case-law finding the national legislation to be compatible with EU law)cjeu_case · 18 mai 2021
29513Case T-264/21: Action brought on 17 May 2021 — Établissement Amra v EUIPO — eXpresio (Shape of a rebound shoe with the word elements ‘Aerower Jumper1 M’)cjeu_case · 17 mai 2021
29514Case T-261/21: Action brought on 17 May 2021 — Sturz v EUIPO — Clatronic International (STEAKER)cjeu_case · 17 mai 2021
29515Case T-259/21: Action brought on 17 May 2021 — Neolith Distribution v EUIPO (Representation of an ornamental pattern)cjeu_case · 17 mai 2021
29516Case C-315/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) lodged on 17 May 2021 — PP v Ministero dell’Interno, Dipartimento per le Libertà civili e l’Immigrazione — Unità Dublinocjeu_case · 17 mai 2021
29517Case C-310/21 P: Appeal brought on 17 May 2021 by Aquind Ltd, Aquind Energy Sàrl, Aquind SAS against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 5 March 2021 in Case T-885/19, Aquind and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 17 mai 2021
29518Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 May 2021.#Petrus Kerstens v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Civil service – Officials – Request for assistance – Rejection of the complaint – Time limit for bringing an action – Starting point – Date on which the person concerned could have known the content of the decision – Delay – Inadmissibility.#Case T-672/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2021
29519Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 May 2021.#Petrus Kerstens v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Civil service – Officials – Request for assistance – Rejection of the complaint – Time limit for bringing an action – Starting point – Date on which the person concerned could have known the content of the decision – Delay – Inadmissibility.#Case T-672/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2021
29520Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 May 2021.#Electrodomesticos Taurus, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application of a declaratory nature – Application for directions to be issued – Inadmissibility.#Case T-328/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2021