28961Case T-558/20: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT10) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark GT10 — Earlier EU figurative mark GT — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Relevant public — Level of attention — Action manifestly well founded)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28962Case T-423/20: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT9) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark GT9 — Earlier EU figurative mark GT — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Relevant public — Level of attention — Action manifestly well founded)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28963Case T-422/20: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT5) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark GT5 — Earlier EU figurative mark GT — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Relevant public — Level of attention — Action manifestly well founded)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28964Case T-421/20: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT3) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark GT3 — Earlier EU figurative mark GT — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Relevant public — Level of attention — Action manifestly well founded)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28965Case T-420/20: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT8) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark GT8 — Earlier EU figurative mark GT — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Relevant public — Level of attention — Action manifestly well founded)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28966Case T-487/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Rezon v EUIPO (imot.bg) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark imot.bg — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Partial confirmatory decision)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28967Case T-481/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Magnetec v EUIPO (CoolTUBE) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark CoolTUBE — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28968Case T-415/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — KT v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Disciplinary proceedings — Summary dismissal for grave misconduct — Rights of the defence — Hearing of witnesses — Delegation of power — Preparation of the contested decision — Reasonable period of time — Impartiality — Protection of personal data — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28969Case T-368/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Smiley Miley v EUIPO — Cyrus Trademarks (MILEY CYRUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MILEY CYRUS — Earlier EU figurative mark CYRUS — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28970Case T-215/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Fidia farmaceutici v EUIPO — Ioulia and Irene Tseti Pharmaceutical Laboratories (HYAL) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark HYAL — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Right to be heard — Audi alteram partem rule — Obligation to state reasons — Sound administration and equal treatment — Article 165(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28971Case T-196/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Chanel v EUIPO — Innovative Cosmetic Concepts (INCOCO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark INCOCO — Earlier national word marks COCO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28972Case T-187/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Davide Groppi v EUIPO — Viabizzuno (Table lamp) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a table lamp — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28973Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Eleanor Sharpston v Council of the European Union and Representatives of the Governments of the Member States.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consequences of the departure of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union for the members of the Court of Justice – Decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States to appoint three Judges and an Advocate General to the Court of Justice – End of the mandate of an Advocate General – Action for annulment.#Case C-685/20 P.cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28974Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Eleanor Sharpston v Council of the European Union and Representatives of the Governments of the Member States.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consequences of the departure of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union for the members of the Court of Justice – Decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States to appoint three Judges and an Advocate General to the Court of Justice – End of the mandate of an Advocate General – Action for annulment.#Case C-685/20 P.cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28975Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Eleanor Sharpston v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consequences of the departure of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union for the members of the Court of Justice – Declaration of the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States – End of the mandate of an Advocate General – Action for annulment.#Case C-684/20 P.cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28976Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Eleanor Sharpston v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consequences of the departure of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union for the members of the Court of Justice – Declaration of the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States – End of the mandate of an Advocate General – Action for annulment.#Case C-684/20 P.cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28977Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Economic and monetary policy – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Article 18(1) – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Imposition of an administrative pecuniary penalty for infringement of prudential requirements – Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Article 26(3) – Own funds requirements – Capital instruments – Issuance of ordinary shares – Categorisation as Common Equity Tier 1 items (CET 1) – No prior authorisation by the competent authority – Negligent breach.#Joined Cases C-456/20 P to C-458/20 P.cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28978Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Economic and monetary policy – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Article 18(1) – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Imposition of an administrative pecuniary penalty for infringement of prudential requirements – Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Article 26(3) – Own funds requirements – Capital instruments – Issuance of ordinary shares – Categorisation as Common Equity Tier 1 items (CET 1) – No prior authorisation by the competent authority – Negligent breach.#Joined Cases C-456/20 P to C-458/20 P.cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28979Joined Cases C-456/20 P to C-458/20 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 June 2021 — Crédit agricole SA (C-456/20 P), Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank (C-457/20 P), CA Consumer Finance (C-458/20 P) v European Central Bank (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Economic and monetary policy — Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Article 18(1) — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Conferral of specific tasks on the European Central Bank (ECB) — Infliction of an administrative financial penalty for breach of prudential requirements — Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Article 26(3) — Own funds requirements — Capital instruments — Issuance of ordinary shares — Classification as Common Equity Tier 1 (CET 1) — No prior authorisation by the competent authority — Negligent breach)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.
28980Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#RA v European Court of Auditors.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2016 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 11 – Absence of staff report – Comparison of merits – Compliance with a judgment of the General Court – Adoption of a new decision not to promote – Obligation to state reasons – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-867/19.cjeu_case · 16 июня 2021 г.