28941Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GT5 – Earlier EU figurative mark GT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Relevant public – Level of attention – Action manifestly well founded.#Case T-422/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28942Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GT5 – Earlier EU figurative mark GT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Relevant public – Level of attention – Action manifestly well founded.#Case T-422/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28943Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GT3 – Earlier EU figurative mark GT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Relevant public – Level of attention – Action manifestly well founded.#Case T-421/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28944Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GT3 – Earlier EU figurative mark GT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Relevant public – Level of attention – Action manifestly well founded.#Case T-421/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28945Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GT8 – Earlier EU figurative mark GT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Relevant public – Level of attention – Action manifestly well founded.#Case T-420/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28946Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GT8 – Earlier EU figurative mark GT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Relevant public – Level of attention – Action manifestly well founded.#Case T-420/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28947Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Rezon OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark imot.bg – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctiveness – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Partial confirmatory decision.#Case T-487/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28948Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Rezon OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark imot.bg – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctiveness – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Partial confirmatory decision.#Case T-487/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28949Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Magnetec - Gesellschaft für Magnettechnologie mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark CoolTUBE – Absolute ground for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-481/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28950Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Magnetec - Gesellschaft für Magnettechnologie mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark CoolTUBE – Absolute ground for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-481/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28951Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#KT v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Summary dismissal for grave misconduct – Rights of the defence – Hearing of witnesses – Delegation of power – Preparation of the contested decision – Reasonable period of time – Impartiality – Protection of personal data – Proportionality.#Case T-415/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28952Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#KT v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Summary dismissal for grave misconduct – Rights of the defence – Hearing of witnesses – Delegation of power – Preparation of the contested decision – Reasonable period of time – Impartiality – Protection of personal data – Proportionality.#Case T-415/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28953Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Smiley Miley, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MILEY CYRUS – Earlier EU figurative mark CYRUS – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-368/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28954Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Smiley Miley, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MILEY CYRUS – Earlier EU figurative mark CYRUS – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-368/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28955Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Fidia farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark HYAL – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Absolute ground for refusal – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Audi alteram partem rule – Obligation to state reasons – Sound administration and equal treatment – Article 165(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-215/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28956Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Fidia farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark HYAL – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Absolute ground for refusal – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Right to be heard – Audi alteram partem rule – Obligation to state reasons – Sound administration and equal treatment – Article 165(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-215/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28957Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Chanel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark INCOCO – Earlier national word marks COCO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-196/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28958Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Chanel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark INCOCO – Earlier national word marks COCO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-196/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28959Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Davide Groppi Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a table lamp – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-187/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021
28960Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Davide Groppi Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a table lamp – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-187/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2021