Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
28923

Case C-153/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 June 2021 — Republic of Lithuania v European Commission, Czech Republic (Appeal — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Republic of Lithuania — Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 — Administrative checks — On-the-spot check — Quality of checks — Quality of the applicants — Artificial conditions — Expenditure incurred through projects)

cjeu_case ·
28924

Joined Cases C-58/20 and C-59/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Austria) — K (C-58/20), DBKAG (C-59/20) v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Linz (References for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 135(1) — Exemptions — Management of special investment funds — Outsourcing — Services provided by a third party)

cjeu_case ·
28925

Case C-23/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 June 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Klagenævnet for Udbud — Denmark) — Simonsen & Weel A/S v Region Nordjylland og Region Syddanmark (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Framework contract — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 5(5) — Article 18(1) — Articles 33 and 49 — Annexe V, part C, points 7, 8 and 10 — Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1986 — Annexe II, sections II.1.5 and II.2.6 — Procurement procedures — Obligation to indicate, in the contract notice or the tender specifications, first, the estimated quantity or the estimated value and, second, the maximum quantity or the maximum value of the products to be supplied under a framework contract — Principles of transparency and equal treatment — Directive 89/665/EEC — Article 2d(1) — Procedures for review of the award of public contracts — Ineffectiveness of the contract — Exception)

cjeu_case ·
28928

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 17 juin 2021.#Mittelbayerischer Verlag KG contre SM.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Article 7, point 2 – Compétence spéciale en matière délictuelle ou quasi délictuelle – Lieu où le fait dommageable s’est produit ou risque de se produire – Personne alléguant une violation de ses droits de la personnalité, résultant de la publication d’un article sur Internet – Lieu de la matérialisation du dommage – Centre des intérêts de cette personne.#Affaire C-800/19.

cjeu_case ·
28929

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 June 2021.#Mittelbayerischer Verlag KG v SM.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Article 7(2) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the harmful event occurred or may occur – Person claiming infringement of his personality rights resulting from the publication of an article online – Place in which the damage occurred – Centre of the interests of that person.#Case C-800/19.

cjeu_case ·
28930

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 June 2021.#Mircom International Content Management & Consulting (M.I.C.M.) Limited v Telenet BVBA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) and (2) – Concept of ‘making available to the public’ – Downloading of a file containing a protected work via a peer-to-peer network and the simultaneous provision for uploading pieces of that file – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 3(2) – Misuse of measures, procedures and remedies – Article 4 – Persons entitled to apply for the application of measures, procedures and remedies – Article 8 – Right of information – Article 13 – Concept of ‘prejudice’ – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Point (f) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Lawfulness of processing – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Legislative measures to restrict the scope of the rights and obligations – Fundamental rights – Articles 7 and 8, Article 17(2) and the first paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European.#Case C-597/19.

cjeu_case ·
28931

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 June 2021.#Mircom International Content Management & Consulting (M.I.C.M.) Limited v Telenet BVBA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ondernemingsrechtbank Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) and (2) – Concept of ‘making available to the public’ – Downloading of a file containing a protected work via a peer-to-peer network and the simultaneous provision for uploading pieces of that file – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 3(2) – Misuse of measures, procedures and remedies – Article 4 – Persons entitled to apply for the application of measures, procedures and remedies – Article 8 – Right of information – Article 13 – Concept of ‘prejudice’ – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Point (f) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Lawfulness of processing – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Legislative measures to restrict the scope of the rights and obligations – Fundamental rights – Articles 7 and 8, Article 17(2) and the first paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European.#Case C-597/19.

cjeu_case ·
28932

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 17 June 2021.#European Parliament v UZ.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Administrative investigation – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of objective impartiality – Cross-appeal – Rejection of a request for assistance – Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to be heard.#Case C-894/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
28934

Case C-800/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie — Poland) — Mittelbayerischer Verlag KG v SM (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Article 7(2) — Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict — Place where the harmful event occurred or may occur — Person claiming infringement of his personality rights resulting from the publication of an article online — Place in which the damage occurred — Centre of the interests of that person)

cjeu_case ·
28935

Case C-597/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ondernemingsrechtbank Antwerpen — Belgium) — Mircom International Content Management & Consulting (M.I.C.M.) Limited v Telenet BVBA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 3(1) and (2) — Concept of ‘making available to the public’ — Downloading of a file containing a protected work via a peer-to-peer network and the simultaneous provision for uploading pieces of that file — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 3(2) — Misuse of measures, procedures and remedies — Article 4 — Persons entitled to apply for the application of measures, procedures and remedies — Article 8 — Right of information — Article 13 — Concept of ‘prejudice’ — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Point (f) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Lawfulness of processing — Directive 2002/58/EC — Article 15(1) — Legislative measures to restrict the scope of the rights and obligations — Fundamental rights — Articles 7 and 8, Article 17(2) and the first paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

cjeu_case ·
28936

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GT10 – Earlier EU figurative mark GT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Relevant public – Level of attention – Action manifestly well founded.#Case T-558/20.

cjeu_case ·
28937

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GT10 – Earlier EU figurative mark GT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Relevant public – Level of attention – Action manifestly well founded.#Case T-558/20.

cjeu_case ·
28939

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GT9 – Earlier EU figurative mark GT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Relevant public – Level of attention – Action manifestly well founded.#Case T-423/20.

cjeu_case ·
28940

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GT9 – Earlier EU figurative mark GT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Relevant public – Level of attention – Action manifestly well founded.#Case T-423/20.

cjeu_case ·