28861Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone and Others v Conseil des ministres.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Directive 2004/38/EC – Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Decision to terminate a person’s residence on grounds of public policy – Preventive measures to avoid any risk of the person concerned absconding during the period allowed for that person to leave the territory of the host Member State – National provisions similar to those applicable to third-country nationals under Article 7(3) of Directive 2008/115/EC – Maximum period of detention for the purpose of removal – National provision identical to that applicable to third-country nationals.#Case C-718/19.cjeu_case · 22 juin 2021
28862Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone and Others v Conseil des ministres.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Directive 2004/38/EC – Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Decision to terminate a person’s residence on grounds of public policy – Preventive measures to avoid any risk of the person concerned absconding during the period allowed for that person to leave the territory of the host Member State – National provisions similar to those applicable to third-country nationals under Article 7(3) of Directive 2008/115/EC – Maximum period of detention for the purpose of removal – National provision identical to that applicable to third-country nationals.#Case C-718/19.cjeu_case · 22 juin 2021
28863Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#Proceedings brought by B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 5, 6 and 10 – National legislation providing for public access to personal data relating to penalty points imposed for road traffic offences – Lawfulness – Concept of ‘personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences’ – Disclosure for the purpose of improving road safety – Right of public access to official documents – Freedom of information – Reconciliation with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data – Re-use of data – Article 267 TFEU – Temporal effect of a preliminary ruling – Ability of a constitutional court of a Member State to maintain the legal effects of national legislation incompatible with EU law – Principles of primacy of EU law and of legal certainty.#Case C-439/19.cjeu_case · 22 juin 2021
28864Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#Proceedings brought by B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 5, 6 and 10 – National legislation providing for public access to personal data relating to penalty points imposed for road traffic offences – Lawfulness – Concept of ‘personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences’ – Disclosure for the purpose of improving road safety – Right of public access to official documents – Freedom of information – Reconciliation with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data – Re-use of data – Article 267 TFEU – Temporal effect of a preliminary ruling – Ability of a constitutional court of a Member State to maintain the legal effects of national legislation incompatible with EU law – Principles of primacy of EU law and of legal certainty.#Case C-439/19.cjeu_case · 22 juin 2021
28865Case C-872/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021 — Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Venezuela — Action for annulment brought by a third State — Admissibility — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Locus standi — Condition that the applicant must be directly concerned by the measure that forms the subject matter of the action — Concept of a ‘legal person’ — Interest in bringing proceedings — Regulatory act which does not entail implementing measures)cjeu_case · 22 juin 2021
28866Case C-719/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — FS v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the Union — Directive 2004/38/EC — Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States — Article 15 — End of a Union citizen’s temporary residence in the territory of the host Member State — Expulsion decision — Physical departure of that Union citizen from that territory — Temporal effects of that expulsion decision — Article 6 — Possibility for that Union citizen to enjoy a new right of residence on his or her return to that territory)cjeu_case · 22 juin 2021
28867Case C-718/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle — Belgium) — Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone, Association pour le droit des Étrangers ASBL, Coordination et Initiatives pour et avec les Réfugiés et Étrangers ASBL, Ligue des Droits de l’Homme ASBL, Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen ASBL v Conseil des ministres (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the Union — Articles 20 and 21 TFEU — Directive 2004/38/EC — Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States — Decision to terminate a person’s residence on grounds of public policy — Preventive measures to avoid any risk of the person concerned absconding during the period allowed for that person to leave the territory of the host Member State — National provisions similar to those applicable to third-country nationals under Article 7(3) of Directive 2008/115/EC — Maximum period of detention for the purpose of removal — National provision identical to that applicable to third-country nationals)cjeu_case · 22 juin 2021
28868Case C-439/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa — Latvia) — Proceedings brought by B (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Articles 5, 6 and 10 — National legislation providing for public access to personal data relating to penalty points imposed for road traffic offences — Lawfulness — Concept of ‘personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences’ — Disclosure for the purpose of improving road safety — Right of public access to official documents — Freedom of information — Reconciliation with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data — Re-use of data — Article 267 TFEU — Temporal effect of a preliminary ruling — Ability of a constitutional court of a Member State to maintain the legal effects of national legislation incompatible with EU law — Principles of primacy of EU law and of legal certainty)cjeu_case · 22 juin 2021
28869Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#Frank Peterson v Google LLC and Others and Elsevier Inc.v Cyando AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Making available and management of a video-sharing platform or a file‑hosting and -sharing platform – Liability of the operator for infringements of intellectual property rights by users of its platform – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3 and Article 8(3) – Concept of ‘communication to the public’ – Directive 2000/31/EC – Articles 14 and 15 – Conditions for exemption from liability – No knowledge of specific infringements – Notification of such infringements as a condition for obtaining an injunction.#Joined Cases C-682/18 and C-683/18.cjeu_case · 22 juin 2021
28870Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#Frank Peterson v Google LLC and Others and Elsevier Inc.v Cyando AG.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Making available and management of a video-sharing platform or a file‑hosting and -sharing platform – Liability of the operator for infringements of intellectual property rights by users of its platform – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3 and Article 8(3) – Concept of ‘communication to the public’ – Directive 2000/31/EC – Articles 14 and 15 – Conditions for exemption from liability – No knowledge of specific infringements – Notification of such infringements as a condition for obtaining an injunction.#Joined Cases C-682/18 and C-683/18.cjeu_case · 22 juin 2021
28871Joined Cases C-682/18 and C-683/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Frank Peterson v Google LLC, YouTube LLC, YouTube Inc., Google Germany GmbH (C-682/18) and Elsevier Inc. v Cyando AG (C-683/18) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Copyright and related rights — Making available and management of a video-sharing platform or a file hosting and -sharing platform — Liability of the operator for infringements of intellectual property rights by users of its platform — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 3 and Article 8(3) — Concept of ‘communication to the public’ — Directive 2000/31/EC — Articles 14 and 15 — Conditions for exemption from liability — No knowledge of specific infringements — Notification of such infringements as a condition for obtaining an injunction)cjeu_case · 22 juin 2021
28873Case T-347/21: Action brought on 21 June 2021 — Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRBcjeu_case · 21 juin 2021
28874Case T-343/21: Action brought on 21 June 2021 — Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development v EUIPO — Aruba (ARUBA)cjeu_case · 21 juin 2021
28875Case T-341/21: Action brought on 21 June 2021 — Rauff-Nisthar v Commissioncjeu_case · 21 juin 2021
28876Case C-381/21 P: Appeal brought on 21 June 2021 by Keun Jig Lee against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 21 April 2021 in Case T-382/20, Lee v EUIPOcjeu_case · 21 juin 2021
28877Case C-378/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Austria) lodged on 21 June 2021 — P GmbHcjeu_case · 21 juin 2021
28878Case C-377/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 21 June 2021 — Ville de Mons, Zone de secours Hainaut — Centre v RMcjeu_case · 21 juin 2021
28879Case C-9/21: Order of the President of the Court of 21 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — AX v Deutsche Lufthansa AGcjeu_case · 21 juin 2021
28880Case T-342/21: Action brought on 19 June 2021 — Bambu Sales v EUIPO (BAMBU)cjeu_case · 19 juin 2021