Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
28381

Case C-453/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 July 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission, Land Rheinland-Pfalz, Ryanair DAC (Appeal — State aid — Aid for airports and airlines — Decision classifying the measures in favour of Frankfurt Hahn airport as State aid compatible with the internal market and finding no State aid in favour of airlines using that airport — Inadmissibility of an action for annulment — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Natural or legal person not directly and individually concerned by the decision at issue — Effective judicial protection)

cjeu_case ·
28382

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 July 2021.#IX v WABE eV and MH Müller Handels GmbH v MJ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief – Internal rule of a private undertaking prohibiting the wearing of any visible political, philosophical or religious sign or the wearing of conspicuous, large-sized political, philosophical or religious signs in the workplace – Direct or indirect discrimination – Proportionality – Balancing the freedom of religion and other fundamental rights – Legitimacy of the policy of neutrality adopted by the employer – Need to establish economic loss suffered by the employer.#Joined Cases C-804/18 and C-341/19.

cjeu_case ·
28383

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 July 2021.#IX v WABE eV and MH Müller Handels GmbH v MJ.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Hamburg and Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief – Internal rule of a private undertaking prohibiting the wearing of any visible political, philosophical or religious sign or the wearing of conspicuous, large-sized political, philosophical or religious signs in the workplace – Direct or indirect discrimination – Proportionality – Balancing the freedom of religion and other fundamental rights – Legitimacy of the policy of neutrality adopted by the employer – Need to establish economic loss suffered by the employer.#Joined Cases C-804/18 and C-341/19.

cjeu_case ·
28384

Joined Cases C-804/18 and C-341/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 July 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — IX v WABE eV (C-804/18) and MH Müller Handels GmbH v MJ (C-341/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief — Internal rule of a private undertaking prohibiting the wearing of any visible political, philosophical or religious sign or the wearing of conspicuous, large-sized political, philosophical or religious signs in the workplace — Direct or indirect discrimination — Proportionality — Balancing the freedom of religion and other fundamental rights — Legitimacy of the policy of neutrality adopted by the employer — Need to establish economic loss suffered by the employer)

cjeu_case ·
28387

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 July 2021.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Interim relief – Article 279 TFEU – Application for interim measures – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Independence of the Izba Dyscyplinarna (Disciplinary Chamber) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Effective judicial protection – Independence of judges – Disciplinary regime for judges – Examination of questions of law concerning the lack of independence of judges – Exclusive jurisdiction of the Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs Chamber) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court).#Case C-204/21 R.

cjeu_case ·
28388

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 July 2021.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Interim relief – Article 279 TFEU – Application for interim measures – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Independence of the Izba Dyscyplinarna (Disciplinary Chamber) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Effective judicial protection – Independence of judges – Disciplinary regime for judges – Examination of questions of law concerning the lack of independence of judges – Exclusive jurisdiction of the Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs Chamber) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court).#Case C-204/21 R.

cjeu_case ·
28396

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 14 July 2021.#A v B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Scope – Article 2(11) – Definition of ‘wrongful removal or retention of a child’ – Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 – Application for return of a child of a young age whose parents have joint custody – Third-country nationals – Transfer of the child and his mother to the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection under Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III).#Case C-262/21 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
28397

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#AI v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.#Action for annulment and for damages – Civil service – ECDC staff – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Damage to reputation – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Dismissal of application – Right to be heard – Absence of prima facie evidence – Duty of care – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-79/20.

cjeu_case ·
28398

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#AI v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.#Action for annulment and for damages – Civil service – ECDC staff – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Damage to reputation – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Dismissal of application – Right to be heard – Absence of prima facie evidence – Duty of care – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-79/20.

cjeu_case ·
28399

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Veronese v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark VERONESE – Earlier EU word mark VERONESE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation 207/2009 (now Article (8)(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – res judicata.#Case T-749/20.

cjeu_case ·
28400

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Veronese v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark VERONESE – Earlier EU word mark VERONESE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation 207/2009 (now Article (8)(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – res judicata.#Case T-749/20.

cjeu_case ·