Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
2761

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Electrabel SA and Others v Commission de Régulation de l’Electricité et du Gaz (CREG).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 – Emergency intervention to address high energy prices – Article 2(5) and (9) – Articles 6 to 8 – Cap on market revenues obtained by electricity producers using certain energy sources – Determination of ‘market revenues’ – National legislation providing for the use of presumptions that are either irrebuttable or rebuttable by means of other presumptions – Principle of proportionality – Article 22(2)(c) – Period of application of Articles 6 to 8 of that regulation – Application of a measure capping revenue for a period prior to that provided for in that regulation, pursuant to national legislation adopted after the entry into force of that regulation – Principles of the primacy and effectiveness of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-633/23.

cjeu_case ·
2762

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Electrabel SA and Others v Commission de Régulation de l’Electricité et du Gaz (CREG).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 – Emergency intervention to address high energy prices – Article 2(5) and (9) – Articles 6 to 8 – Cap on market revenues obtained by electricity producers using certain energy sources – Determination of ‘market revenues’ – National legislation providing for the use of presumptions that are either irrebuttable or rebuttable by means of other presumptions – Principle of proportionality – Article 22(2)(c) – Period of application of Articles 6 to 8 of that regulation – Application of a measure capping revenue for a period prior to that provided for in that regulation, pursuant to national legislation adopted after the entry into force of that regulation – Principles of the primacy and effectiveness of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-633/23.

cjeu_case ·
2763

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#H (ved DRC Dansk Flygtningehjælp) v Udlændingestyrelsen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 29(1) – Transfer time limit – Determination of the starting point of the six-month time limit – Bringing of an appeal with suspensive effect – New circumstance brought to the attention of the judicial authority before which that appeal was brought – Annulment of the initial transfer decision and remittal of the case to the competent administrative authority – Adoption of a second transfer decision which is also the subject of an action for annulment – Consequences for the calculation of the transfer time limit.#Case C-560/23.

cjeu_case ·
2764

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#H (ved DRC Dansk Flygtningehjælp) v Udlændingestyrelsen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Flygtningenævnet København.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 29(1) – Transfer time limit – Determination of the starting point of the six-month time limit – Bringing of an appeal with suspensive effect – New circumstance brought to the attention of the judicial authority before which that appeal was brought – Annulment of the initial transfer decision and remittal of the case to the competent administrative authority – Adoption of a second transfer decision which is also the subject of an action for annulment – Consequences for the calculation of the transfer time limit.#Case C-560/23.

cjeu_case ·
2765

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 2 TEU – Article 4(3) TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by EU law – Principles of autonomy, primacy, effectiveness and the uniform application of EU law – Principle of the binding effect of the case-law of the Court – Judgments of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court, Poland) – Judgments of the Court and interim measures under Article 279 TFEU relating to the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rejection by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) of those judgments and of those measures as ultra vires – National constitutional identity – Prohibition issued by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) preventing all public authorities from applying Article 2 TEU and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Improper composition of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court).#Case C-448/23.

cjeu_case ·
2766

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 2 TEU – Article 4(3) TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law – Principles of autonomy, primacy, effectiveness and the uniform application of EU law – Principle of the binding effect of the case-law of the Court – Judgments of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court, Poland) – Judgments of the Court and interim measures under Article 279 TFEU relating to the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rejection by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) of those judgments and of those measures as ultra vires – National constitutional identity – Prohibition issued by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) preventing all public authorities from applying Article 2 TEU and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Improper composition of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court).#Case C-448/23.

cjeu_case ·
2768

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Concepts of ‘ethnic origin’, ‘direct discrimination’ and ‘indirect discrimination’ – National legislation requiring the adoption of development plans designed to reduce the percentage of public family housing units in certain residential areas – Identification of those areas according to the proportion of ‘immigrants from non-Western countries and their descendants’ – Whether justified – Social cohesion and integration – Housing policy – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for the home – Proportionality.#Case C-417/23.

cjeu_case ·
2769

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Concepts of ‘ethnic origin’, ‘direct discrimination’ and ‘indirect discrimination’ – National legislation requiring the adoption of development plans designed to reduce the percentage of public family housing units in certain residential areas – Identification of those areas according to the proportion of ‘immigrants from non-Western countries and their descendants’ – Whether justified – Social cohesion and integration – Housing policy – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for the home – Proportionality.#Case C-417/23.

cjeu_case ·
2770

Case C-769/23, Mara: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Mara Soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa, Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence aspects – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services)

cjeu_case ·
2771

Case C-731/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025 – Nicoventures Trading and Others v Commission (Appeal – Public health – Heated tobacco products – Withdrawal of certain exemptions – Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 – Action for annulment – Standing – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the applicant must be individually concerned by the contested act – Limited class of economic operators – Reporting and notification obligations – Marketing authorisation)

cjeu_case ·
2772

Case C-679/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025 – WS and Others v Frontex (Joint return operation) (Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations to protect fundamental rights – Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex – Frontex’s non-contractual liability – Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered)

cjeu_case ·
2773

Case C-633/23, Electrabel and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel de Bruxelles – Belgium) – Electrabel SA, Fédération Belge des Entreprises Électriques et Gazières ASBL, Organisatie voor Duurzame Energie Vlaanderen ASBL, Wind4Wallonia 2 SA, Luminus SA, EDF Belgium SA, ActiVent Wallonie SCRL, Eol’Wapi SA, Lumiwind SC, Luminus Wind Together SC v Commission de Régulation de l’Électricité et du Gaz (CREG) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 – Emergency intervention to address high energy prices – Article 2(5) and (9) – Articles 6 to 8 – Cap on market revenues obtained by electricity producers using certain energy sources – Determination of market revenues – National legislation providing for the use of presumptions that are either irrebuttable or rebuttable by means of other presumptions – Principle of proportionality – Article 22(2)(c) – Period of application of Articles 6 to 8 of that regulation – Application of a measure capping revenue for a period prior to that provided for in that regulation, pursuant to national legislation adopted after the entry into force of that regulation – Principles of the primacy and effectiveness of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation)

cjeu_case ·
2774

Case C-560/23, Tang: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Flygtningenævnet – Denmark) – H (ved DRC Dansk Flygtningehjælp) v Udlændingestyrelsen (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 29(1) – Transfer time limit – Determination of the starting point of the six-month time limit – Bringing of an appeal with suspensive effect – New circumstance brought to the attention of the judicial authority before which that appeal was brought – Annulment of the initial transfer decision and remittal of the case to the competent administrative authority – Adoption of a second transfer decision which is also the subject of an action for annulment – Consequences for the calculation of the transfer time limit)

cjeu_case ·
2775

Case C-448/23: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025 – Commission v Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 2 TEU – Article 4(3) TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law – Principles of autonomy, primacy, effectiveness and the uniform application of EU law – Principle of the binding effect of the case-law of the Court – Judgments of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court, Poland) – Judgments of the Court and interim measures under Article 279 TFEU relating to the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rejection by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) of those judgments and of those measures as ultra vires – National constitutional identity – Prohibition issued by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) preventing all public authorities from applying Article 2 TEU and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Improper composition of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court))

cjeu_case ·
2777

Case C-417/23, Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab, Afdeling Schackenborgvænge: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret – Nordhavn – Denmark) – Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab, Afdeling Schackenborgvænge, XM, ZQ, FZ, DL, WS, JI, PB, VT, YB, TJ, RK v MV, EH, LI, AQ, LO, Social-, Bolig- og Ældreministeriet (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Concepts of ethnic origin, direct discrimination and indirect discrimination – National legislation requiring the adoption of development plans designed to reduce the percentage of public family housing units in certain residential areas – Identification of those areas according to the proportion of immigrants from non-Western countries and their descendants – Whether justified – Social cohesion and integration – Housing policy – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for the home – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·