27601Ordonnance de rectification du 16 septembre 2021.#IX contre WABE eV et MH Müller Handels GmbH contre MJ.#Rectification d’arrêt.#Affaires jointes C-804/18 REC et C-341/19 REC.cjeu_case · 16 septembre 2021
27602Case T-588/21: Action brought on 15 September 2021 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27603Case T-587/21: Action brought on 15 September 2021 — lastminute v EUIPO — Scai (B Heroes)cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27604Case C-567/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 15 September 2021 — BNP Paribas SA v TRcjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27605Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 15 September 2021.#Timo Beelow v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark made of wood – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-702/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27606Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 15 September 2021.#Timo Beelow v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark made of wood – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-702/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27607Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Freshly Cosmetics, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark IDENTY BEAUTY – Earlier national figurative mark IDENTITY THE IMAGE CLUB – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-688/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27608Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Freshly Cosmetics, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark IDENTY BEAUTY – Earlier national figurative mark IDENTITY THE IMAGE CLUB – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-688/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27609Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Celler Lagravera, SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Cíclic – Earlier EU word mark CYCLIC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-673/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27610Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Celler Lagravera, SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Cíclic – Earlier EU word mark CYCLIC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-673/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27611Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#LF v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Remuneration – Expatriation allowance – Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Refusal to grant the expatriation allowance – Habitual residence – Duties performed in an international organisation established in the State of employment.#Case T-466/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27612Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#LF v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Remuneration – Expatriation allowance – Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Refusal to grant the expatriation allowance – Habitual residence – Duties performed in an international organisation established in the State of employment.#Case T-466/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27613Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Le-Vel – Earlier national word mark LEVEL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-331/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27614Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Le-Vel – Earlier national word mark LEVEL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-331/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27615Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 September 2021.#MHCS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark depicting a shade of the colour orange – Absolute ground for refusal – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Examination of the facts of the EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Nature of the mark – Colour mark – Right to be heard – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-274/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27616Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 September 2021.#MHCS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative EU mark depicting a shade of the colour orange – Absolute ground for refusal – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Examination of the facts of the EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Nature of the mark – Colour mark – Right to be heard – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-274/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27617Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Stavros Arnaoutakis and Others v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Amendment of the voluntary additional pension scheme – Refusal to grant a voluntary additional pension – Plea of illegality – Competence of the Bureau of the Parliament – Rights acquired and future entitlements – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Legal certainty.#Cases T-240/20 to T-245/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27618Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Stavros Arnaoutakis and Others v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Amendment of the voluntary additional pension scheme – Refusal to grant a voluntary additional pension – Plea of illegality – Competence of the Bureau of the Parliament – Rights acquired and future entitlements – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Legal certainty.#Cases T-240/20 to T-245/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27619Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Residencial Palladium, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark PALLADIUM HOTELS & RESORTS – Conditions of admissibility of the application for the declaration of invalidity – Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-207/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021
27620Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Residencial Palladium, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark PALLADIUM HOTELS & RESORTS – Conditions of admissibility of the application for the declaration of invalidity – Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-207/20.cjeu_case · 15 septembre 2021