2741Case C-345/24, AGCOM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) v BRT SpA, Federazione Italiana Trasportatori (FEDIT) and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Postal parcel delivery services provided to the public – Directive 97/67/EC – Articles 22 and 22a – Regulation (EU) 2018/644 – Article 4 – Decision of the national regulatory authority imposing on parcel delivery service providers obligations to provide information – Legal basis for the competence of that authority to impose specific obligations to provide information on operators not carrying out cross-border parcel delivery – Proportionality)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2742Case C-325/24, Bissilli: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Firenze – Italy) – Criminal proceedings against HG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Article 3 – Material scope – Concept of investigative measure – Purpose – Obtaining evidence – Article 10 – Recourse to a different type of investigative measure – Article 11 – Grounds for non-recognition or non-execution – Fundamental rights – Article 22 – Temporary transfer to the issuing State of the person held in custody for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure – Article 24 – Hearing of the accused person by videoconference – Article 24(2)(b) – Fundamental principles of the law of the executing Member State)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2743Case C-323/24, Deity Shoes: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Alicante – Spain) – Deity Shoes, S.L. v Mundorama Confort, S.L., Stay Design, S.L. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Articles 4 to 6 and 14 – Conditions for the protection of a design – Novelty – Individual character – Visual characteristics predetermined by a third party – Freedom of the designer in developing the design – Concept of informed user – Influence of features linked to fashion trends)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2744Case C-320/24, Soledil: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – CR, TP v Soledil Srl admitted to a collective insolvency procedure known as concordato preventivo (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of that directive – Power of review and obligations of the national court – Penalty clause – No review of the court’s own motion of whether that term is unfair – Res judicata – Principle of effectiveness – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reliance on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court to which the case has been remitted following cassation)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2745Case C-316/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 – PAN Europe v Commission (Appeal – Agriculture – Plant protection products – Article 4 – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 – Renewal of the approval of the active substance cypermethrin – Request for internal review – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 10(1) – Decision refusing the request – Risk assessment and risk management – Identification of critical areas of concern – Realistic conditions of use – Precautionary principle)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2746Joined Cases C-296/24 to C-307/24, Jouxy and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – Luxembourg) – SM, PX and Others v Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Social advantages – Family allowance – Condition for granting that allowance to a non-resident worker for a child of his or her spouse or registered partner – Requirement that that worker must support that child – Assessment criteria – Presumption based on the existence of a joint household – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 2(2)(c) – Concept of family member)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2747Case C-260/24, Lukoil Bulgaria: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-oblast – Bulgaria) – Lukoil Bulgaria EOOD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Wholesale market for fuel in Bulgaria – Margin squeeze on competitors – Product market definition – Vertically divided market – Taking into account the excise duty regime)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2748Case C-259/24, Tenergie (Request for remission of import duties): Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal judiciaire de Marseille – France) – SAS Tenergie Development v Directeur régional des douanes de Marseille, Direction interrégionale des douanes Provence – Alpes – Côte d’Azur – Corse, Direction régionale des douanes de Marseille (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Import and export procedures – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Transmission of the file requesting remission to the European Commission – Automatic remission of duties – Liability of the Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2749Case C-245/24, Lukoil Bulgaria and Lukoil Neftohim Burgas: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-oblast – Bulgaria) – Lukoil Bulgaria EOOD, Lukoil Neftohim Burgas AD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Market for the storage of automotive fuels – Abuse – Refusal of access to essential infrastructure for third-party undertakings – Infrastructure financed by public funds – Privatisation of that infrastructure)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2750Case C-184/24, Sidi Bouzid: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Lombardia – Italy) – AF, acting in his own name and as legal representative of his minor child BF v Ministero dell’Interno – U.T.G. – Prefettura di Milano (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Applicants for international protection – Article 7 – Place of residence – Article 18 – Material reception conditions – Housing – Accommodation centres – Transfer – Applicant’s refusal – Article 20(1)(a) – Reduction of material reception conditions or withdrawal of that benefit in exceptional and duly justified cases – Abandonment of the place of residence without informing the competent authority or without permission – Article 20(4) – Serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre – Article 20(5) – Proportionality – Dignified standard of living – Article 21 – Applicants falling within the category of vulnerable persons – Article 23 – Minors – Power of a Member State to withdraw material reception conditions if the applicant refuses to be transferred to another accommodation centre)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2751Case C-182/24, SACD and Others: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris – France) – RB, as successor in title to Claude Chabrol, and Others v Société des auteurs et compositeurs dramatiques (SACD), Radio Days SARL, Brinter Company Ltd, BS, MW, Artedis SA, Panoceanic Films SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 and 8 – Directive 2004/48/EC – Articles 1 to 3 – Directive 2006/115/EC – Directive 2006/116/EC – Articles 1, 2 and 9 – Articles 17 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Right to an effective remedy – National legislation under which the admissibility of an action for infringement brought by one of the joint holders of the copyright in a cinematographic work is conditional on all the joint holders of that copyright being called on to participate in the proceedings)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2752Case C-168/24, PMJC: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – France) – PMJC SAS v [W] [X], [M] [X],[X] Créative SAS (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 12(2)(b) – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 20(b) – Grounds for revocation of a mark – Trade mark liable to mislead the public as a result of the use made of it – Trade mark corresponding to the name of a fashion designer – Assignment of the trade mark – Use of the trade mark in such a way as to make the public actually believe that the designer is still involved in the design of the goods bearing the trade mark – Misled belief)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2753Case C-161/24, OSA: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně – Czech Republic) – OSA, z.s., formerly OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Collective management organisation handling copyright – Rates for royalties for the provision of a licence to make copyrighted works available – Hotel establishments – Calculation method – Failure to take into account the rate of occupancy of rooms – Unfair prices)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2754Case C-136/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025 – Hamoudi v Frontex (Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non-contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2755Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa and Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence aspects – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services.#Case C-769/23.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2756Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa and Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services.#Case C-769/23.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2757Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Nicoventures Trading Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Public health – Heated tobacco products – Withdrawal of certain exemptions – Delegated Directive EU 2022/2100 – Action for annulment – Standing – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the applicant must be individually concerned by the contested act – Limited class of economic operators – Reporting and notification obligations – Marketing authorisation.#Case C-731/23 P.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2758Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Nicoventures Trading Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Public health – Heated tobacco products – Withdrawal of certain exemptions – Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 – Action for annulment – Standing – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the applicant must be individually concerned by the contested act – Limited class of economic operators – Reporting and notification obligations – Marketing authorisation.#Case C-731/23 P.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2759Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#WS and Others v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations to protect fundamental rights – Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex – Frontex’s non-contractual liability – Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered.#Case C-679/23 P.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.
2760Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#WS and Others v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations to protect fundamental rights – Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex – Frontex’s non-contractual liability – Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered.#Case C-679/23 P.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2025 г.