27481Case T-607/12: Action brought on 22 September 2021 — Blueroots Technology v EUIPO — Rezk-Salama and Breitlauch (SKILLTREE STUDIOS)cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27482Order of the Court of 22 September 2021.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-369/21 P.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27483Order of the Court of 22 September 2021.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-369/21 P.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27484Case C-580/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 22 September 2021 — EEW Energy from Waste Großräschen GmbH v MNG Mitteldeutsche Netzgesellschaft Strom GmbHcjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27485Case C-579/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Itä-Suomen hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 22 September 2021 — J.M.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27486Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Asian Gear BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a scooter – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-686/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27487Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Asian Gear BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a scooter – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-686/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27488Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Asian Gear BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a scooter – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-685/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27489Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Asian Gear BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a scooter – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-685/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27490Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#T i D kontrolni sistemi EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing signalling apparatuses and devices – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Declaration of invalidity of a prior design – No effect – Disclosure of the earlier design – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-503/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27491Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#T i D kontrolni sistemi EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing signalling apparatuses and devices – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Declaration of invalidity of a prior design – No effect – Disclosure of the earlier design – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-503/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27492Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 September 2021.#JR v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/03/AD/18 (AD 6) – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition – Obligation to state reasons – Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings – Weighting of the elements of a test specified in the competition notice.#Case T-435/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27493Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 September 2021.#JR v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/03/AD/18 (AD 6) – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition – Obligation to state reasons – Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings – Weighting of the elements of a test specified in the competition notice.#Case T-435/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27494Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Moviescreens Rental GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark airscreen – Absolute grounds for refusal – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-250/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27495Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Moviescreens Rental GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark airscreen – Absolute grounds for refusal – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-250/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27496Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 September 2021 (Extracts).#Maher Al-Imam v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Damage to reputation.#Case T-203/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27497Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 September 2021 (Extracts).#Maher Al-Imam v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Damage to reputation.#Case T-203/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27498Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Sociedade da Água de Monchique, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark chic ÁGUA ALCALINA 9,5 PH – Earlier EU word mark CHIC BARCELONA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-195/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27499Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Sociedade da Água de Monchique, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark chic ÁGUA ALCALINA 9,5 PH – Earlier EU word mark CHIC BARCELONA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-195/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021
27500Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Henry Cotton's Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Proceedings for the revocation of decisions or for the cancellation of entries – Cancellation of an entry in the register which contains an obvious error attributable to EUIPO – Trade marks involved in insolvency proceedings – Registration of the transfers of the marks – Effects vis-à-vis third parties of bankruptcy or similar proceedings – Competence of EUIPO – Duty of diligence – Articles 20, 24, 27 and 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Articles 3, 7 and 19 of Regulation (EU) 2015/848.#Case T-173/20.cjeu_case · 22 septembre 2021