27221Case C-13/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Top System SA v Belgian State (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Legal protection of computer programs — Directive 91/250/EEC — Article 5 — Exceptions to the restricted acts — Acts necessary to enable the lawful purchaser to correct errors — Concept — Article 6 — Decompilation — Conditions)cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27222Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Sipcam Oxon SpA v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance chlorothalonil – Non-renewal of inclusion in the annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 – Assessment procedure – Rights of the defence – Proposed classification of an active substance – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Precautionary principle.#Case T-518/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27223Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Sipcam Oxon SpA v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance chlorothalonil – Non-renewal of inclusion in the annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 – Assessment procedure – Rights of the defence – Proposed classification of an active substance – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Precautionary principle.#Case T-518/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27224Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Wepa Hygieneprodukte GmbH and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid regime implemented by Germany for certain large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges for the period 2012-2013 – Decision declaring the aid regime incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid granted – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Concept of ‘aid’ – State resources – Selectivity.#Case T-238/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27225Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Wepa Hygieneprodukte GmbH and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid regime implemented by Germany for certain large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges for the period 2012-2013 – Decision declaring the aid regime incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid granted – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Concept of ‘aid’ – State resources – Selectivity.#Case T-238/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27226Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. KG and Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Action for annulment – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of aid – State resources.#Joined Cases T-233/19 and T-234/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27227Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. KG and Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Action for annulment – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of aid – State resources.#Joined Cases T-233/19 and T-234/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27228Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#AZ v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Action for annulment – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of aid – State resources – Selectivity – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-196/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27229Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#AZ v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Action for annulment – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of aid – State resources – Selectivity – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-196/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27230Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (Extracts).#Tempus Energy Germany GmbH and T Energy Sweden AB v European Commission.#State aid – Polish electricity market – Capacity mechanism – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid scheme – Article 108(2) and (3) TFEU – Concept of doubts – Article 4(3) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Serious difficulties – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-167/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27231Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (Extracts).#Tempus Energy Germany GmbH and T Energy Sweden AB v European Commission.#State aid – Polish electricity market – Capacity mechanism – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid scheme – Article 108(2) and (3) TFEU – Concept of doubts – Article 4(3) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Serious difficulties – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-167/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27232Case T-518/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Sipcam Oxon v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance chlorothalonil — Non-renewal of inclusion in the annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 — Assessment procedure — Rights of the defence — Proposed classification of an active substance — Legal certainty — Proportionality — Precautionary principle)cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27233Case T-238/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Wepa Hygieneprodukte and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid regime implemented by Germany for certain large electricity consumers — Exemption from network charges for the period 2012-2013 — Decision declaring the aid regime incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid granted — Action for annulment — Time limit for bringing an action — Admissibility — Concept of ‘aid’ — State resources — Selectivity)cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27234Joined Cases T-233/19 and T-234/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Infineon Technologies Dresden and Infineon Technologies v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers — Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid — Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Admissibility — Concept of aid — State resources)cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27235Case T-196/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — AZ v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers — Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid — Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Admissibility — Concept of aid — State resources — Selectivity — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations)cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27236Case T-167/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Tempus Energy Germany and T Energy Sweden v Commission (State aid — Polish electricity market — Capacity mechanism — Decision not to raise any objections — Aid scheme — Article 108(2) and (3) TFEU — Concept of doubts — Article 4(3) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Serious difficulties — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 — Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Procedural rights of the interested parties — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27237Opinion of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Istanbul Convention.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU – Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention) – Signature by the European Union – Draft conclusion by the European Union – Concept of an ‘agreement envisaged’, within the meaning of Article 218(11) TFEU – External competences of the European Union – Substantive legal basis – Article 78(2) TFEU – Article 82(2) TFEU – Article 83(1) TFEU – Article 84 TFEU – Article 336 TFEU – Articles 1 to 4a of Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice – Partial participation of Ireland in the conclusion of the Istanbul Convention by the European Union – Possibility of splitting the act concluding an international agreement into two separate decisions according to the applicable legal bases – Practice of ‘common accord’ – Compatibility with the TEU and the TFEU.#Case Avis 1/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27238Rectification order of 6 October 2021.#Irish Ferries Ltd v National Transport Authority.#Rectification of judgment.#Case C-570/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27239Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Sumal, S.L. v Mercedes Benz Trucks España, S.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Compensation for harm caused by a practice prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU – Determination of the undertakings liable to provide compensation – Action for compensation directed against the subsidiary of a parent company and brought following a decision finding only that the parent company participated in a cartel – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Concept of ‘economic unit’.#Case C-882/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021
27240Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Sumal, S.L. v Mercedes Benz Trucks España, S.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Compensation for harm caused by a practice prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU – Determination of the undertakings liable to provide compensation – Action for compensation directed against the subsidiary of a parent company and brought following a decision finding only that the parent company participated in a cartel – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Concept of ‘economic unit’.#Case C-882/19.cjeu_case · 6 octobre 2021