Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
2701

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SM and Others v Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Social advantages – Family allowance – Condition for granting that allowance to a non-resident worker for a child of his or her spouse or registered partner – Requirement that that worker must ‘support’ that child – Assessment criteria – Presumption based on the existence of a joint household – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 2(2)(c) – Concept of ‘family member’.#Joined Cases C-296/24 to C-307/24.

cjeu_case ·
2702

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SM and Others v Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Social advantages – Family allowance – Condition for granting that allowance to a non-resident worker for a child of his or her spouse or registered partner – Requirement that that worker must ‘support’ that child – Assessment criteria – Presumption based on the existence of a joint household – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 2(2)(c) – Concept of ‘family member’.#Joined Cases C-296/24 to C-307/24.

cjeu_case ·
2704

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#« Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-oblast.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Wholesale market for fuel in Bulgaria – Margin squeeze on competitors – Product market definition – Vertically divided market – Taking into account the excise duty regime.#Case C-260/24.

cjeu_case ·
2705

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SAS Tenergie Development v Directeur Régional des Douanes de Marseille and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Import and export procedures – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Transmission of the file requesting remission to the European Commission – Automatic remission of duties – Liability of the Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-259/24.

cjeu_case ·
2706

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SAS Tenergie Development v Directeur Régional des Douanes de Marseille and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Import and export procedures – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Transmission of the file requesting remission to the European Commission – Automatic remission of duties – Liability of the Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-259/24.

cjeu_case ·
2707

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#« Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD and « Lukoil Neftohim Burgas » AD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Market for the storage of automotive fuels – Abuse – Refusal of access to essential infrastructure for third-party undertakings – Infrastructure financed by public funds – Privatisation of that infrastructure.#Case C-245/24.

cjeu_case ·
2708

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#« Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD and « Lukoil Neftohim Burgas » AD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-oblast.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Market for the storage of automotive fuels – Abuse – Refusal of access to essential infrastructure for third-party undertakings – Infrastructure financed by public funds – Privatisation of that infrastructure.#Case C-245/24.

cjeu_case ·
2709

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#AF, en son nom propre et en qualité de personne exerçant la responsabilité parentale sur l’enfant mineur BF v Ministero dell’Interno - U.T.G. - Prefettura di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Applicants for international protection – Article 7 – Place of residence – Article 18 – Material reception conditions – Housing – Accommodation centres – Transfer – Applicant’s refusal – Article 20(1)(a) – Reduction of material reception conditions or withdrawal of that benefit in exceptional and duly justified cases – Abandonment of the place of residence without informing the competent authority or without permission – Article 20(4) – Serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre – Article 20(5) – Proportionality – Dignified standard of living – Article 21 – Applicants falling within the category of vulnerable persons – Article 23 – Minors – Power of a Member State to withdraw material reception conditions if the applicant refuses to be transferred to another accommodation centre.#Case C-184/24.

cjeu_case ·
2710

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#AF, en son nom propre et en qualité de personne exerçant la responsabilité parentale sur l’enfant mineur BF v Ministero dell’Interno - U.T.G. - Prefettura di Milano.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Applicants for international protection – Article 7 – Place of residence – Article 18 – Material reception conditions – Housing – Accommodation centres – Transfer – Applicant’s refusal – Article 20(1)(a) – Reduction of material reception conditions or withdrawal of that benefit in exceptional and duly justified cases – Abandonment of the place of residence without informing the competent authority or without permission – Article 20(4) – Serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre – Article 20(5) – Proportionality – Dignified standard of living – Article 21 – Applicants falling within the category of vulnerable persons – Article 23 – Minors – Power of a Member State to withdraw material reception conditions if the applicant refuses to be transferred to another accommodation centre.#Case C-184/24.

cjeu_case ·
2711

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RB, en qualité d’ayant droit de Claude Chabrol and Others v Société des Auteurs et Compositeurs Dramatiques (SACD) and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 and 8 – Directive 2004/48/EC – Articles 1 to 3 – Directive 2006/115/EC – Directive 2006/116/EC – Articles 1, 2 and 9 – Articles 17 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Right to an effective remedy – National legislation making the admissibility of an action for infringement brought by one of the co-holders of the copyright in a cinematographic work conditional on all of the co-holders of that copyright being called on to participate in the proceedings.#Case C-182/24.

cjeu_case ·
2712

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RB, en qualité d’ayant droit de Claude Chabrol and Others v Société des Auteurs et Compositeurs Dramatiques (SACD) and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Articles 2 to 4 and 8 – Directive 2004/48/EC – Articles 1 to 3 – Directive 2006/115/EC – Directive 2006/116/EC – Articles 1, 2 and 9 – Articles 17 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Remedies – Right to an effective remedy – National legislation under which the admissibility of an action for infringement brought by one of the joint holders of the copyright in a cinematographic work is conditional on all the joint holders of that copyright being called on to participate in the proceedings.#Case C-182/24.

cjeu_case ·
2713

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#PMJC SAS v [W] [X] and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Art. 12(2)(b) – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 20(b) – Grounds for revocation of a mark – Trade mark liable to mislead the public as a result of the use made of it – Trade mark corresponding to the name of a fashion designer – Assignment of the trade mark – Use of the trade mark in such a way as to make the public actually believe that the designer is still involved in the design of the goods bearing the trade mark – Misled belief.#Case C-168/24.

cjeu_case ·
2714

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#PMJC SAS v [W] [X] and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Art. 12(2)(b) – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 20(b) – Grounds for revocation of a mark – Trade mark liable to mislead the public as a result of the use made of it – Trade mark corresponding to the name of a fashion designer – Assignment of the trade mark – Use of the trade mark in such a way as to make the public actually believe that the designer is still involved in the design of the goods bearing the trade mark – Misled belief.#Case C-168/24.

cjeu_case ·
2715

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#OSA, z.s., anciennement OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Collective management organisation handling copyright – Rates for royalties for the provision of a licence to make copyrighted works available – Hotel establishments – Calculation method – Failure to take into account the rate of occupancy of rooms – Unfair prices.#Case C-161/24.

cjeu_case ·
2716

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#OSA, z.s., anciennement OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Collective management organisation handling copyright – Rates for royalties for the provision of a licence to make copyrighted works available – Hotel establishments – Calculation method – Failure to take into account the rate of occupancy of rooms – Unfair prices.#Case C-161/24.

cjeu_case ·
2717

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non-contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case.#Case C-136/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
2718

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non-contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case.#Case C-136/24 P.

cjeu_case ·