Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

27041

Case T-45/21: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Ciano Trading & Services CT & S and Others v Commission (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Sustainable restoration for the Commission in Brussels and its surroundings — Annulment of the tendering procedure — Legitimate expectations — Abuse of rights)

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27042

Case C-630/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 13 October 2021 — O.K. v Mercedes-Benz Bank AG

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27043

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Andreas Freundlieb v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – EU word mark BANDIT – Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration – Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration – Application for restitutio in integrum – Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Duty of care – No review – Failure to comply with time limits.#Case T-733/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27044

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Andreas Freundlieb v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – EU word mark BANDIT – Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration – Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration – Application for restitutio in integrum – Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Duty of care – No review – Failure to comply with time limits.#Case T-733/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27045

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Andreas Freundlieb v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – EU word mark CRYSTAL – Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration – Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration – Application for restitutio in integrum – Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Duty of care – No review – Failure to comply with time limits.#Case T-732/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27046

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Andreas Freundlieb v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – EU word mark CRYSTAL – Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration – Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration – Application for restitutio in integrum – Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Duty of care – No review – Failure to comply with time limits.#Case T-732/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27047

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Škoda Investement a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing an arrow with wing – Earlier EU figurative mark representing an arrow with wing – Relative ground for refusal – Partial rejection of the opposition – Limited scope of the opposition in the context of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Partial withdrawal of the opposition – Plea raised by the Board of Appeal of its own motion – Prohibition on ruling ultra petita.#Case T-712/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27048

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Škoda Investement a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing an arrow with wing – Earlier EU figurative mark representing an arrow with wing – Relative ground for refusal – Partial rejection of the opposition – Limited scope of the opposition in the context of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Partial withdrawal of the opposition – Plea raised by the Board of Appeal of its own motion – Prohibition on ruling ultra petita.#Case T-712/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27049

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Unimax Stationery v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark UNI-MAX – Earlier EU figurative marks uni and uni-ball – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-591/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27050

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Unimax Stationery v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark UNI-MAX – Earlier EU figurative marks uni and uni-ball – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-591/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27051

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Setarcos Consulting ltd. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Blockchain Island – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-523/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27052

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Setarcos Consulting ltd. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Blockchain Island – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-523/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27053

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Sedus Stoll AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ – Earlier national and international word marks ERGOPLUS – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-436/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27054

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Sedus Stoll AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ – Earlier national and international word marks ERGOPLUS – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-436/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27055

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Sedus Stoll AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ – Earlier national word mark ERGOPLUS – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-429/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27056

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Sedus Stoll AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ – Earlier national word mark ERGOPLUS – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-429/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27057

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#JK v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Commission staff working for the EEAS – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Implied decision rejecting the request – Decision rejecting the complaint – Article 90 of the Staff Regulations – Competent Appointing Authority – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-219/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27058

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#JK v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Commission staff working for the EEAS – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Implied decision rejecting the request – Decision rejecting the complaint – Article 90 of the Staff Regulations – Competent Appointing Authority – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-219/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27059

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 October 2021 (Extracts).#IB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Suspension of the invalidity procedure during the disciplinary proceedings – Removal from post – Invalidity procedure devoid of purpose following the official’s removal from his post – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-22/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.

27060

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 October 2021 (Extracts).#IB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Suspension of the invalidity procedure during the disciplinary proceedings – Removal from post – Invalidity procedure devoid of purpose following the official’s removal from his post – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-22/20.

cjeu_case · 13 октября 2021 г.