2661Case C-858/25 P: Appeal brought on 18 December 2025 by CQ against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 8 October 2025 in Case T-117/24, CQ v EESCcjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2662Case C-853/25, Najvyšší súd: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ústavný súd Slovenskej republiky lodged on 18 December 2025 – RL v Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republikycjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2663Case C-848/25: Action brought on 18 December 2025 – European Commission v Kingdom of Swedencjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2664Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 December 2025.###cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2666Case C-502/25, YETTEL BULGARIA II: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – YETTEL BULGARIA EAD v FB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2667Case C-318/25, Proschik: Order of the President of the Court of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt – Germany) – RK v Meta Platforms Ireland Limitedcjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2668Case C-293/25, Moguchev: Order of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad – Sofia – Bulgaria) – in the proceedings relating to the execution of the European arrest warrant issued against RT (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Question the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of execution of a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 8(1) – Recognition of a judgment imposing a custodial sentence for the purpose of enforcing the sentence – Article 25 – Compliance with the conditions and procedure laid down by that framework decision in the event that a Member State undertakes to enforce a sentence imposed by a judgment delivered by a court of the State issuing the European arrest warrant – Consent on the part of the issuing State as regards the assumption of responsibility for the enforcement of such a sentence by a Member State – Application of Framework Decision 2008/909 to the recognition procedure in that Member State)cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2669Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v GLOBUS Handelshof GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Answer admitting of no reasonable doubt – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic products – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Article 3(52) – Concept of ‘labelling’ – Concept of ‘label’ – Article 3(53) – Concept of ‘advertising’ – Article 30(1) – Products bearing terms referring to organic production – Article 32(1)(a) – Obligation to indicate the code number of the control authority or control body to which the operator that carried out the last production or preparation operation is subject – Inapplicability to advertising leaflets promoting those products.#Case C-745/24.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2670Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v GLOBUS Handelshof GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Answer admitting of no reasonable doubt – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic products – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Article 3(52) – Concept of ‘labelling’ – Concept of ‘label’ – Article 3(53) – Concept of ‘advertising’ – Article 30(1) – Products bearing terms referring to organic production – Article 32(1)(a) – Obligation to indicate the code number of the control authority or control body to which the operator that carried out the last production or preparation operation is subject – Inapplicability to advertising leaflets promoting those products.#Case C-745/24.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2671Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) v Amazon Italia Services Srl and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Empowering national competition authorities to enforce the rules on competition – Directive (EU) 2019/1 – Independence of national competition authorities – Article 4(5) – Setting priorities for the proceedings for the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Fines on undertakings and associations of undertakings – Article 13 – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – National legislation requiring the national authority to commence the inter partes investigation stage of the procedure within a time limit of 90 days, starting from the moment it has knowledge of the infringement – Annulment of the decision of that authority in the event of failure to comply with that time limit – Revocation of the power to penalise the practice concerned – Principle of effectiveness – Rights of defence of undertakings.#Case C-491/24.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2672Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) v Amazon Italia Services Srl and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Case C-491/24.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2673Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Proceedings brought by.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Notary acting as a deputy for another notary – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Measures relating to the European Certificate of Succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Refusal by a bank to recognise the European Certificate of Succession – Article 71 – Initiation by a notary, of his or her own motion, of the procedure for the withdrawal or modification of the European Certificate of Succession – No exercise of a judicial function – Inadmissibility.#Case C-240/24.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2674Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Proceedings brought by.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Notariusz w Krapkowicach Justyna Gawlica - Krapkowice.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Notary acting as a deputy for another notary – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Measures relating to the European Certificate of Succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Refusal by a bank to recognise the European Certificate of Succession – Article 71 – Initiation by a notary, of his or her own motion, of the procedure for the withdrawal or modification of the European Certificate of Succession – No exercise of a judicial function – Inadmissibility.#Case C-240/24.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2675Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#CJ contre Service fédéral des Pensions (SFP).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fonctionnaires – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Annexe VIII – Pensions – Droits à pension acquis avant l’entrée au service de l’Union européenne – Transfert au régime de pension des institutions de l’Union européenne – Demande de transfert du travailleur – Irrévocabilité de ce transfert – Enrichissement sans cause.#Affaire C-776/24.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2676Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#CJ v Service fédéral des Pensions (SFP).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Annex VIII – Pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the pension scheme of the European Union institutions – Transfer request of the worker – Irrevocability of that transfer – Unjust enrichment.#Case C-776/24.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2677Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Single supervisory mechanism – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 4 – Setting of prudential requirements – Article 16 – Risk linked to irrevocable payment commitments (IPCs) given in favour of deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds – Deduction in full from the Common Equity Tier 1 capital of the sums paid as collateral for the IPCs – Discretion of the ECB – Judicial review.#Case C-552/24 P.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2678Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v European Central Bank.#Case C-552/24 P.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2679Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Société générale v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Single supervisory mechanism – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 4 – Setting of prudential requirements – Article 16 – Risk linked to irrevocable payment commitments (IPCs) given in favour of deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds – Deduction in full from the Common Equity Tier 1 capital of the sums paid as collateral for the IPCs – Discretion of the ECB – Judicial review.#Case C-550/24 P.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025
2680Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Société générale v European Central Bank.#Case C-550/24 P.cjeu_case · 18 décembre 2025