Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
26504

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 November 2021.#König Ludwig International GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-465/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26505

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 November 2021.#König Ludwig International GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-465/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26510

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#QC v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Pension – Transfer of national pension rights – Decision establishing the number of pensionable years of service – Circumscribed powers – Action for annulment and for damages – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law – No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations – Inadmissibility – Request for directions to be issued – Clear lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-77/21.

cjeu_case ·
26511

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#QC v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Pension – Transfer of national pension rights – Decision establishing the number of pensionable years of service – Circumscribed powers – Action for annulment and for damages – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law – No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations – Inadmissibility – Request for directions to be issued – Clear lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-77/21.

cjeu_case ·
26515

Case T-77/21: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2021 — QC v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Pension — Transfer of national pension rights — Decision establishing the number of pensionable years of service — Circumscribed powers — Action for annulment and for damages — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law — No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations — Inadmissibility — Request for directions to be issued — Clear lack of jurisdiction)

cjeu_case ·
26516

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 November 2021.#Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-425/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26517

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 November 2021.#Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-425/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26518

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 November 2021.#Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-424/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26519

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 November 2021.#Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-424/21 P.

cjeu_case ·