26421Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#État belge v LO and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 – Technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew – Points 9 and 10 of Subpart A of Appendix 3 to Annex I – Training course for the issue of a commercial pilot licence – Flying training – Instrument ground time – Calculation – Simulator training – Skill test – Principle of legal certainty – Temporal limitation of the effects of a preliminary ruling.#Case C-413/20.cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26422Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#État belge v LO and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 – Technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew – Points 9 and 10 of Subpart A of Appendix 3 to Annex I – Training course for the issue of a commercial pilot licence – Flying training – Instrument ground time – Calculation – Simulator training – Skill test – Principle of legal certainty – Temporal limitation of the effects of a preliminary ruling.#Case C-413/20.cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26423Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 18 novembre 2021.#Promexor Trade Srl contre DDirecția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Cluj – Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Bihor.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Harmonisation des législations fiscales – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Droit à déduction de la TVA – Annulation de l’identification à la TVA d’un assujetti – Refus du droit à déduction – Conditions formelles.#Affaire C-358/20.cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26424Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Promexor Trade Srl v Direcţia Generală a Finanţelor Publice Cluj – Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bihor.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Oradea.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Right to deduct VAT – Revocation of the VAT identification of a taxable person – Refusal of the right of deduction – Formal requirements.#Case C-358/20.cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26425Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 18 novembre 2021.#« Visma Enterprise » SIA contre Konkurences padome.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Concurrence – Ententes – Article 101, paragraphes 1 et 3, TFUE – Accords verticaux – Restriction “par objet” ou “par effet” – Exemption – Enregistrement par le distributeur de la transaction potentielle avec l’utilisateur final – Clause conférant au distributeur une “priorité pour la réalisation de l’opération de vente” pendant six mois à compter de l’enregistrement – Exception – Opposition de l’utilisateur – Compétence de la Cour – Situation purement interne – Législation nationale se conformant aux solutions retenues par le droit de l’Union.#Affaire C-306/20.cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26426Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#SIA „Visma Enterprise” v Konkurences padome.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101(1) and (3) TFEU – Vertical agreements – Restriction ‘by object’ or ‘by effect’ – Exemption – Registration by the distributor of the potential transaction with the end user – Clause giving the distributor ‘priority in progressing the sale process’ for six months from the time of registration – Exception – Objection of the user – Jurisdiction of the Court – Purely internal situation – National legislation adopting the same approach as that provided for under EU law.#Case C-306/20.cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26427Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#M.P. and B.P. v „A.” prowadzący działalność za pośrednictwem „A.” S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency – Contractual term relating to the buying and selling rates of a foreign currency – Requirement of intelligibility and transparency – Powers of the national court.#Case C-212/20.cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26428Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#M.P. and B.P. v „A.” prowadzący działalność za pośrednictwem „A.” S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency – Contractual term relating to the buying and selling rates of a foreign currency – Requirement of intelligibility and transparency – Powers of the national court.#Case C-212/20.cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26429Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Hellenic Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the Hellenic Republic – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 52(4)(c) – Flat-rate financial corrections – 24-month period – Expenses covered by the 24-month period – Method of calculating the correction – Adjustment of the rate of correction.#Case C-107/20 P.cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26430Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Hellenic Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the Hellenic Republic – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 52(4)(c) – Flat-rate financial corrections – 24-month period – Expenses covered by the 24-month period – Method of calculating the correction – Adjustment of the rate of correction.#Case C-107/20 P.cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26431Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 November 2021.#Criminal proceedings against VD bd]
 
 Criminal proceedings against VD and SR.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#References for a preliminary ruling – Single market for financial services – Market abuse – Insider dealing – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 12(2)(a) and (d) – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 23(2)(g) and (h) – Supervisory and investigatory powers of the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) – General interest objective seeking to protect the integrity of financial markets in the European Union and public confidence in financial instruments – Option open to the AMF to require the traffic data records held by an operator providing electronic communications services – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Confidentiality of the communications – Restrictions – Legislation providing for the general and indiscriminate retention of traffic data by operators providing electronic communications services – Option for a national court to restrict the temporal effects of a declaration of invalidity in respect of provisions of national law that are incompatible with EU law – Precluded.#Joined Cases C-339/20 and C-397/20.cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26432Conclusions de l'avocat général M. M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona, présentées le 18 novembre 2021.###cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26433Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 18 November 2021.###cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26434Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 November 2021.###cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26435Case C-413/20: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — État belge v LO and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 — Technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew — Points 9 and 10 of Subpart A of Appendix 3 to Annex I — Training course for the issue of a commercial pilot licence — Flying training — Instrument ground time — Calculation — Simulator training — Skill test — Principle of legal certainty — Temporal limitation of the effects of a preliminary ruling)cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26436Case C-358/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Oradea — Romania) — Promexor Trade SRL v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Cluj — Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Bihor (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Right to deduct VAT — Revocation of the VAT identification of a taxable person — Refusal of the right of deduction — Formal requirements)cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26437Case C-306/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa, Latvia) — ‘Visma Enterprise’ SIA v Konkurences padome (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 101(1) and (3) TFEU — Vertical agreements — Restriction ‘by object’ or ‘by effect’ — Exemption — Registration by the distributor of the potential transaction with the end user — Clause conferring on the distributor ‘priority in progressing the sale process’ for 6 months from registration — Exception — Objection by the user — Jurisdiction of the Court — Purely internal situation — National legislation consistent with the solutions adopted by EU law)cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26438Case C-212/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie — Poland) — M.P., B.P. v ‘A.’ prowadzący działalność za pośrednictwem ‘A.’ S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency — Contractual term relating to the buying and selling rates of a foreign currency — Requirement of intelligibility and transparency — Powers of the national court)cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26439Case C-107/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 November 2021 — Hellenic Republic v European Commission (Appeal — Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Hellenic Republic — Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Article 52(4)(c) — Flat-rate financial corrections — Period of 24 months — Expenditure covered by that period — Method of calculating the correction — Adjustment of the correction rate)cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.
26440Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Fereydoun Mahmoudian v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran – Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of his name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Action for damages – Jurisdiction of the Court to rule on a claim seeking compensation for the damage allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case C-681/19 P.cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2021 г.