Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
25821

Case C-124/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Bank Melli Iran v Telekom Deutschland GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Commercial policy — Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 — Protection against the effects of the extraterritorial application of legislation adopted by a third country — Restrictive measures taken by the United States of America against Iran — Secondary sanctions adopted by that third country preventing persons from engaging, outside its territory, in commercial relationships with certain Iranian undertakings — Prohibition on complying with such a law — Exercise of the right of ordinary termination)

cjeu_case ·
25822

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Worldwide Spirits Supply, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark CLEOPATRA QUEEN – Earlier national word mark CLEOPATRA MELFINCO – Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Declaration of invalidity.#Case T-870/19.

cjeu_case ·
25823

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Worldwide Spirits Supply, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark CLEOPATRA QUEEN – Earlier national word mark CLEOPATRA MELFINCO – Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Declaration of invalidity.#Case T-870/19.

cjeu_case ·
25824

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#HB v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Provision of technical assistance services to the Ukrainian authorities – Decision to reduce the amount of the contract and to recover the amounts already paid – Action for annulment and for damages – Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable – No arbitration clause – Inadmissibility – No heads of damage that are separable from the contract.#Case T-796/19.

cjeu_case ·
25825

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#HB v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Provision of technical assistance services to the Ukrainian authorities – Decision to reduce the amount of the contract and to recover the amounts already paid – Action for annulment and for damages – Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable – No arbitration clause – Inadmissibility – No heads of damage that are separable from the contract.#Case T-796/19.

cjeu_case ·
25826

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#HB v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Provision of technical assistance services to the High Judicial Council – Decision to reduce the amount of the contract and to recover the amounts already paid – Action for annulment and for damages – Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable – No arbitration clause – Inadmissibility – No heads of damage that are separable from the contract.#Case T-795/19.

cjeu_case ·
25827

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#HB v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Provision of technical assistance services to the High Judicial Council – Decision to reduce the amount of the contract and to recover the amounts already paid – Action for annulment and for damages – Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable – No arbitration clause – Inadmissibility – No heads of damage that are separable from the contract.#Case T-795/19.

cjeu_case ·
25828

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Action for damages – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Initiation of an administrative inquiry – Article 86(2) of the Staff Regulations – Duty to provide information – Duration of the procedure – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Confidentiality of the administrative inquiry – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Non-material damage – Causal link.#Case T-703/19.

cjeu_case ·
25829

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Action for damages – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Initiation of an administrative inquiry – Article 86(2) of the Staff Regulations – Duty to provide information – Duration of the procedure – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Confidentiality of the administrative inquiry – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Non-material damage – Causal link.#Case T-703/19.

cjeu_case ·
25831

Case T-796/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — HB v Commission (Public service contracts — Provision of technical assistance services to the Ukrainian authorities — Decision to reduce the amount of the contract and to recover the amounts already paid — Action for annulment and for damages — Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable — No arbitration clause — Inadmissibility — No heads of damage that are separable from the contract)

cjeu_case ·
25832

Case T-795/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — HB v Commission (Public service contracts — Provision of technical assistance services to the High Judicial Council — Decision to reduce the amount of the contract and to recover the amounts already paid — Action for annulment and for damages — Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable — No arbitration clause — Inadmissibility — No heads of damage that are separable from the contract)

cjeu_case ·
25833

Case T-703/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — DD v FRA (Action for damages — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Initiation of an administrative inquiry — Article 86(2) of the Staff Regulations — Duty to provide information — Duration of the procedure — Reasonable time — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Confidentiality of the administrative inquiry — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Non-material damage — Causal link)

cjeu_case ·
25834

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 21 décembre 2021.#Algebris (UK) Ltd et Anchorage Capital Group LLC contre Conseil de résolution unique (CRU).#Pourvoi – Union économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Redressement et résolution des établissements de crédit et des entreprises d’investissement – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Conseil de résolution unique (CRU) – Procédure de résolution applicable en cas de défaillance avérée ou prévisible d’une entité – Adoption d’un dispositif de résolution à l’égard de Banco Popular Español SA – Instrument de cession des activités – Dépréciation et conversion d’instruments de fonds propres – Règlement (UE) no 806/2014 – Article 20 – Notion de “valorisation définitive” – Conséquences – Refus ou abstention de procéder à une valorisation définitive ex post – Voies de recours – Recours en annulation.#Affaire C-934/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
25835

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Algebris (UK) Ltd and Anchorage Capital Group LLC v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Board (SRB) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español SA – Sale of business tool – Write-down and conversion of capital instruments – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 20 – Concept of ‘definitive valuation’ – Consequences – Refusal or failure to proceed with an ex post definitive valuation – Remedies – Action for annulment.#Case C-934/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
25838

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 21 décembre 2021.#Aeris Invest Sàrl contre Conseil de résolution unique (CRU).#Pourvoi – Union économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Redressement et résolution des établissements de crédit et des entreprises d’investissement – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Conseil de résolution unique (CRU) – Procédure de résolution applicable en cas de défaillance avérée ou prévisible d’une entité – Adoption d’un dispositif de résolution à l’égard de Banco Popular Español SA – Instrument de cession des activités – Dépréciation et conversion d’instruments de fonds propres – Règlement (UE) no 806/2014 – Article 20 – Notion de “valorisation définitive” – Conséquences – Refus ou abstention de procéder à une valorisation définitive ex post – Voies de recours – Recours en annulation.#Affaire C-874/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
25839

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Aeris Invest Sàrl v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Board (SRB) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español SA – Sale of business tool – Write-down and conversion of capital instruments – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 20 – Concept of ‘definitive valuation’ – Consequences – Refusal or failure to proceed with an ex post definitive valuation – Remedies – Action for annulment.#Case C-874/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
25840

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Criminal proceedings against PM and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Decision 2006/928/EC – Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption – Legal nature and effects – Binding on Romania – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Fight against corruption – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Article 325(1) TFEU – ‘PFI’ Convention’ – Criminal proceedings – Decisions of the Curtea Constituțională (Constitutional Court, Romania) concerning the legality of the taking of certain evidence and the composition of judicial panels in cases of serious corruption – Duty on national courts to give full effect to the decisions of the Curtea Constituțională (Constitutional Court) – Disciplinary liability of judges in case of non-compliance with such decisions – Power to disapply decisions of the Curtea Constituțională (Constitutional Court) that conflict with EU law – Principle of primacy of EU law.#Joined Cases C-357/19, C-379/19, C-547/19, C-811/19 and C-840/19.

cjeu_case ·