25741Case T-195/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Klymenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25742Case T-194/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Fidia farmaceutici v EUIPO — Stelis Biopharma (HYALOSTEL ONE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International figurative registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark HYALOSTEL ONE — Earlier EU word mark HYALISTIL and earlier figurative mark HyalOne — Earlier international word mark HYALO — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25743Case T-159/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Bustos v EUIPO — Bicicletas Monty (motwi) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark motwi — Earlier national word mark MONTY — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25744Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals should proceed) of 21 December 2021.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-538/21 P.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25745Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals should proceed) of 21 December 2021.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-538/21 P.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25746Case C-817/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 21 December 2021 — R.I. v Inspecția Judiciară, N.L.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25747Case C-816/21 P: Appeal brought on 21 December 2021 by Luis Miguel Novais against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 25 October 2021 in Case T-595/21 Novais v Portugalcjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25748Case C-815/21 P: Appeal brought on 21 December 2021 by Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Services LLC, Amazon EU Sàrl, Amazon Europe Core Sàrl against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 14 October 2021 in Case T-19/21, Amazon.com and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25749Case C-814/21: Action brought on 21 December 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Polandcjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25750Case C-809/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland zittingsplaats Haarlem (Netherlands) lodged on 21 December 2021 — Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane, kantoor Eindhovencjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25751Case C-808/21: Action brought on 21 December 2021 — European Commission v Czech Republiccjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25752Case C-807/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht (Germany) lodged on 21 December 2021 — Deutsche Wohnen SE v Staatsanwaltschaft Berlincjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25753Case C-806/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 21 December 2021 — Criminal proceedings against TFcjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25754Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Luna Italia Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark LUNA SPLENDIDA – Earlier EU figurative mark Luna – Relative ground for refusal – Article 53(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-571/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25755Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Luna Italia Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark LUNA SPLENDIDA – Earlier EU figurative mark Luna – Relative ground for refusal – Article 53(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-571/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25756Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Fashion Energy Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark 1st AMERICAN – Earlier EU figurative mark representing an eagle or other bird of prey – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Phonetic similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-699/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25757Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Fashion Energy Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark 1st AMERICAN – Earlier EU figurative mark representing an eagle or other bird of prey – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Phonetic similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-699/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25758Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark ARCH FIT – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-598/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25759Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark ARCH FIT – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-598/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25760Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#MO v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Compulsory reassignment – 2019 Appraisal exercise – Right to be heard – Liability.#Case T-587/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.