2521Case T-117/25: Judgment of the Court of 14 January 2026 – Atlas Invest v EUIPO (BioTechUSA) (EU trade mark – Application for the European Union figurative mark BioTechUSA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2522Case T-64/25: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2026 – Leone and Others v EUIPO – Incom (Leone) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Leone – Relative ground for invalidity – Right to an earlier name under Austrian law – Article 60(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2523Case T-9/25: Judgment of the Court of 14 January 2026 – KCT v EUIPO (Movement of a folding window) (EU trade mark – Application for a European Union trade mark consisting of the movement of a folding window – Absolute ground for refusal – Sign consisting exclusively of a feature of the goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2524Order of the Court of 14 January 2026.#Josep Francesc Gómez Jiménez and Others v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-665/25 P.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2525Ordonnance de la Cour du 14 janvier 2026.#Josep Francesc Gómez Jiménez e.a. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-665/25 P.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2526Case C-594/25, Vodafone: Order of the President of the Court of 14 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Lübeck – Germany) – KL v Vodafone GmbHcjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2527Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Lego A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a building block from a toy building set – Earlier EU design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-628/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2528Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Lego A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a building block from a toy building set – Earlier EU design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-628/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2529Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for the EU word marks Kimkom and Kimsum – Earlier EU word mark KIMPTON – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Cases T-619/24 and T-621/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2530Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for the EU word marks Kimkom and Kimsum – Earlier EU word mark KIMPTON – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Cases T-619/24 and T-621/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2531Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Rebell – Declaration of revocation in part – Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Interruption of proceedings – Article 106(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Resumption of proceedings – Article 72(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Application for revocation – Article 63(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Notifications to representatives – Article 60(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625.#Case T-549/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2532Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Rebell – Declaration of revocation in part – Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Interruption of proceedings – Article 106(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Resumption of proceedings – Article 72(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Application for revocation – Article 63(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Notifications to representatives – Article 60(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625.#Case T-549/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2533Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Froneri Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a box with a lid – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Novelty – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.#Case T-517/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2534Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Froneri Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a box with a lid – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Novelty – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.#Case T-517/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2535Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union.#Case T-403/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2536Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 14 janvier 2026.#Engie Energie Services contre Parlement européen.#Marchés publics de services – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Conduite et maintenance des installations techniques des bâtiments du Parlement à Strasbourg – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire et attribution du marché à un autre soumissionnaire – Conformité de l’offre avec les exigences minimales – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation.#Affaire T-308/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2537Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Engie Energie Services v European Parliament.#Case T-308/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2538Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Euro Asia Cargo Private Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibitions relating to dual-use goods and technology – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the prohibitions – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Annex IV to Decision (CFSP) 2014/512 and Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-232/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2539Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Criterion of ‘association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families’ – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property.#Case T-176/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.
2540Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Criterion of ‘association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families’ – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property.#Case T-176/24.cjeu_case · 14 января 2026 г.