24841Case C-148/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Président du tribunal du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 2 March 2022 — OP v Commune d’Anscjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24842Case C-142/22: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 2 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against OEcjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24843Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark META – Earlier national word mark METALGIAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-192/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24844Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark META – Earlier national word mark METALGIAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-192/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24845Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Ubisoft Entertainment v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FOR HONOR – Earlier EU word mark HONOR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-171/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24846Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Ubisoft Entertainment v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FOR HONOR – Earlier EU word mark HONOR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-171/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24847Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark VITADHA – Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-149/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24848Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark VITADHA – Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-149/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24849Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark apo-discounter.de – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-140/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24850Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark apo-discounter.de – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-140/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24851Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 2 mars 2022.#Banco de Investimento Global SA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale EUROBIC – Marques de l’Union européenne figuratives antérieures BiG, BANCO BiG et BiGlobal TRADE – Marques nationales verbales antérieures BANCO BIG et figurative antérieure BANCO BiG – Motif relatif de refus – Absence de risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 207/2009 [devenu article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001].#Affaire T-125/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24852Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Banco de Investimento Global SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark EUROBIC – Earlier EU figurative marks BiG, BANCO BiG and BiGlobal TRADE – Earlier national word marks BANCO BIG and earlier national figurative mark BANCO BiG – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-125/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24853Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Distintiva Solutions S. Coop. Pequeña v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Makeblock – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-86/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24854Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Distintiva Solutions S. Coop. Pequeña v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Makeblock – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-86/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24855Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Fabryki Mebli "Forte" S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an item of furniture – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata.#Case T-1/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24856Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Fabryki Mebli "Forte" S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an item of furniture – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata.#Case T-1/21.cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24857Case T-192/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Beta Sports (META) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark META — Earlier national word mark METALGIAL — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24858Case T-171/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Ubisoft Entertainment v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (FOR HONOR) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark FOR HONOR — Earlier EU word mark HONOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24859Case T-149/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — Vitae Health Innovation (VITADHA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark VITADHA — Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · March 2, 2022
24860Case T-140/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Apologistics v EUIPO — Kerckhoff (apo-discounter.de) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark apo-discounter.de — Partial revocation — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use)cjeu_case · March 2, 2022