24221Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Contracts concluded by the Commission on behalf of the Member States for the delivery of COVID-19 vaccines – Invitation emails to meetings of the Steering Committee – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – The transmission of personal data is not necessary for a specific purpose in the public interest – Article 9(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.#Case T-506/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24222Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Contracts concluded by the Commission on behalf of the Member States for the delivery of COVID-19 vaccines – Invitation emails to meetings of the Steering Committee – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – The transmission of personal data is not necessary for a specific purpose in the public interest – Article 9(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.#Case T-506/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24223Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Biogena GmbH & Co KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark NUTRIFEM AGNUBALANCE – Earlier EU word mark NUTRIBEN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-370/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24224Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Biogena GmbH & Co KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark NUTRIFEM AGNUBALANCE – Earlier EU word mark NUTRIBEN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-370/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24225Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Moio GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark moio.care – Earlier EU word mark Molicare – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-276/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24226Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Moio GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark moio.care – Earlier EU word mark Molicare – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-276/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24227Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Agora Invest, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAMOSA – Earlier EU figurative mark TRAMO,SA TRANSPORTE MAQUINARIA Y OBRAS,S.A. – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-219/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24228Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Agora Invest, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAMOSA – Earlier EU figurative mark TRAMO,SA TRANSPORTE MAQUINARIA Y OBRAS,S.A. – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-219/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24229Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Dorit-DFT Fleischereimaschinen GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark DORIT – Earlier national company names – Relative ground for refusal – No use in trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-208/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24230Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Dorit-DFT Fleischereimaschinen GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark DORIT – Earlier national company names – Relative ground for refusal – No use in trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-208/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24231Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Cilem Records International UG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark HALIX RECORDS – Earlier national word and figurative marks HALIX RECORDS – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rule 19(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(1) and (2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-118/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24232Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Cilem Records International UG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark HALIX RECORDS – Earlier national word and figurative marks HALIX RECORDS – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rule 19(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(1) and (2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-118/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24233Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Hungary v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Obligation to increase on-the-spot checks – Article 35 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Legal value of the working documents of the Commission – Calculation of the increase in the rate of on-the-spot checks.#Case T-57/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24234Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Hungary v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Obligation to increase on-the-spot checks – Article 35 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Legal value of the working documents of the Commission – Calculation of the increase in the rate of on-the-spot checks.#Case T-57/21.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24235Case T-375/21: Order of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Leinfelder Uhren München v EUIPO — Schafft (Representation of a geometric figure) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24236Case T-154/21: Order of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Saure v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Confirmatory application made prematurely — Article 7 of Regulation No 1049/2001 — No challengeable act — Express refusal to grant access — Modification of the application — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24237Case T-680/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Funline International v EUIPO (AMSTERDAM POPPERS) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark AMSTERDAM POPPERS — Absolute ground for refusal — Trade mark contrary to public policy — Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24238Case T-506/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Saure v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Contracts concluded by the Commission on behalf of the Member States for the delivery of COVID-19 vaccines — Invitation emails to meetings of the Steering Committee — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — The transmission of personal data is not necessary for a specific purpose in the public interest — Article 9(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725)cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24239Case T-370/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Biogena v EUIPO — Alter Farmacia (NUTRIFEM AGNUBALANCE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark NUTRIFEM AGNUBALANCE — Earlier EU word mark NUTRIBEN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24240Case T-276/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Moio v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (moio.care) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark moio.care — Earlier EU word mark Molicare — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.