24201Case C-489/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — UB v Kauno teritorinė muitinė (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Union Customs Code — Extinguishment of the customs debt — Goods unlawfully introduced into the customs territory of the European Union — Seizure and confiscation — Directive 2008/118/EC — Excise duties — Directive 2006/112/EC — Value added tax — Chargeable event — Chargeability)cjeu_case · April 7, 2022
24202Joined Cases C-447/20 and C-448/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v LM (C-447/20), BD, Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (C-448/20) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Own resources of the European Union — Protection of the European Union’s financial interests — Proceedings relating to irregularities — Article 4 — Adoption of administrative measures — Article 3(1) — Limitation period for proceedings — Expiry — Whether it may be relied on in the context of the enforced recovery procedure — Article 3(2) — Period for implementation — Applicability — Starting point of the limitation period — Interruption and suspension — Discretion of the Member States)cjeu_case · April 7, 2022
24203Case C-429/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2022 — Solar Ileias Bompaina AE v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Market for electricity generated from renewable energy sources — National legislation which allegedly has the effect of conferring an unlawful advantage on electricity suppliers — Complaint to the European Commission — Rejection decision without initiating the formal investigation procedure — Action for annulment — Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Article 1(h) — Concept of ‘interested party’ — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · April 7, 2022
24204Case C-385/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 49 de Barcelona — Spain) — EL, TP v Caixabank SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Principle of effectiveness — Principle of equivalence — Judicial proceedings seeking a declaration that a contractual term is unfair — National court's power of review of its own motion — National proceedings for taxation of costs — Costs recoverable in respect of lawyers’ fees)cjeu_case · April 7, 2022
24205Case C-342/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — A SCPI (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Articles 63 and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Restrictions — Tax on the income of legal persons — Exemption for investment funds — Conditions for exemption — Condition related to the fund being in contractual form)cjeu_case · April 7, 2022
24206Case C-333/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Berlin Chemie A. Menarini SRL v Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Mijlocii Bucureşti — Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 44 — Place of supply of services — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 — Article 11(1) — Provision of services — Point of reference for tax purposes — Concept of a ‘fixed establishment’ — Company from one Member State affiliated to a company located in another Member State — Suitable structure in terms of human and technical resources — Ability to receive and use the services for the fixed establishment’s own needs — Marketing, regulatory, advertising and representation services provided by a related company to the recipient company)cjeu_case · April 7, 2022
24207Case C-236/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per l’Emilia Romagna — Italy) — PG v Ministero della Giustizia, CSM — Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clauses 2 and 4 — Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Magistrates and ordinary judges — Clause 5 — Measures intended to penalise improper use of fixed-term contracts — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 7 — Paid annual leave)cjeu_case · April 7, 2022
24208Case C-228/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht — Germany) — I GmbH v Finanzamt H (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(b) — Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest — Exemption for hospital and medical care — Private hospital — Duly recognised establishment — Comparable social conditions)cjeu_case · April 7, 2022
24209Case C-176/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — SC Avio Lucos SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură — Centrul judeţean Dolj, Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) — Aparat Central (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Common agricultural policy — Direct support schemes — Common rules — Single area payment scheme — Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 — Article 4(1)(a) and (c) and Article 4(2)(b) — National legislation making direct support conditional on the farmer keeping his own animals — Article 9(1) — Concept of ‘active farmer’ — Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Article 60 — Circumvention clause — Concept of ‘artificially created conditions’)cjeu_case · April 7, 2022
24210Case C-116/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara — Romania) — SC Avio Lucos SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură — Centrul judeţean Dolj, Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) — Aparat Central (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Common agricultural policy — Direct support schemes — Common rules — Single area payment scheme — Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 — Article 2(c) — Concept of ‘agricultural activity’ — Article 35 — Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 — National legislation requiring the production of a legal document establishing the right to use the agricultural parcel made available to the farmer under a concession contract and making the validity of such a contract conditional on the future concessionaire having the status of breeder or owner of animals — Concessionaire of an area of pastureland who has concluded a cooperation contract with animal breeders — Res judicata)cjeu_case · April 7, 2022
24212Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 April 2022.#Sanford LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-19/22 P.cjeu_case · April 6, 2022
24213Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 April 2022.#Sanford LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-19/22 P.cjeu_case · April 6, 2022
24214Case C-244/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 6 April 2022 — NQ v Mara-Tóni Bt.cjeu_case · April 6, 2022
24215Case C-242/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Évora (Portugal) lodged on 6 April 2022 –TLcjeu_case · April 6, 2022
24216Case C-241/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 6 April 2022 — Criminal proceedings against DXcjeu_case · April 6, 2022
24217Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Confirmatory application made prematurely – Article 7 of Regulation No 1049/2001 – No challengeable act – Express refusal to grant access – Modification of the application – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-154/21.cjeu_case · April 6, 2022
24218Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Confirmatory application made prematurely – Article 7 of Regulation No 1049/2001 – No challengeable act – Express refusal to grant access – Modification of the application – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-154/21.cjeu_case · April 6, 2022
24219Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Funline International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark AMSTERDAM POPPERS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Trade mark contrary to public policy – Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-680/21.cjeu_case · April 6, 2022
24220Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Funline International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark AMSTERDAM POPPERS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Trade mark contrary to public policy – Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-680/21.cjeu_case · April 6, 2022