24021Case T-242/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan v Commission (Dumping — Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China — Definitive anti-dumping duties — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/73 — Determination of injury — Article 3(2), (3) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Price undercutting calculation — Causal link)cjeu_case · April 27, 2022
24022Case C-284/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 26 April 2022 — CK v Familienkasse Bayern Nordcjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24023Case C-283/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov (Slovakia) lodged on 26 April 2022 — DZ, EO, YV, YE, MP v Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republikycjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24024Case C-282/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 26 April 2022 — Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v P. in W.cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24025Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#QL v Universitat de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Successive fixed-term contracts in the public sector – Clause 2 and Clause 3(1) – Scope – Concept of ‘fixed-term worker’.#Case C-464/21.cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24026Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#QL v Universitat de Barcelona.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n° 3 de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Successive fixed-term contracts in the public sector – Clause 2 and Clause 3(1) – Scope – Concept of ‘fixed-term worker’.#Case C-464/21.cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24027Case C-464/21: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 3 de Barcelona — Spain) — QL v Universitat de Barcelona (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Successive fixed-term contracts in the public sector — Clause 2 and Clause 3(1) — Scope — Concept of ‘fixed-term worker’)cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24028Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#Criminal proceedings against Apelativna prokuratura - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49 – Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Driving of a vehicle during the period of suspension of the driving licence – Penalties – Factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-654/20.cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24029Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#Criminal proceedings against Apelativna prokuratura - Sofia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49 – Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Driving of a vehicle during the period of suspension of the driving licence – Penalties – Factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-654/20.cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24030Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#RM v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Article 56 TFEU – Games of chance – Provision of prohibited lotteries – Penalties – Proportionality – Minimal fines – Overlapping – Lack of a cap – Alternative custodial sentence – Proportional contribution to procedural costs – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49(3).#Case C-508/20.cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24031Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#RM v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Article 56 TFEU – Games of chance – Provision of prohibited lotteries – Penalties – Proportionality – Minimal fines – Overlapping – Lack of a cap – Alternative custodial sentence – Proportional contribution to procedural costs – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49(3).#Case C-508/20.cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24032Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#NW v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Free movement of persons – Regulation (EU) 2016/399 – Schengen Borders Code – Article 25(4) – Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders for a maximum total duration of six months – National legislation providing for a number of successive periods of border control resulting in that duration being exceeded – Non-compliance of such legislation with Article 25(4) of the Schengen Borders Code where the successive periods are based on the same threat or threats – National legislation requiring, on pain of a penalty, a passport or identity card to be presented when the internal border control is carried out – Non-compliance of such an obligation with Article 25(4) of the Schengen Borders Code when the border control itself is contrary to that provision.#Case C-368/20.cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24033Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#NW v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Free movement of persons – Regulation (EU) 2016/399 – Schengen Borders Code – Article 25(4) – Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders for a maximum total duration of six months – National legislation providing for a number of successive periods of border control resulting in that duration being exceeded – Non-compliance of such legislation with Article 25(4) of the Schengen Borders Code where the successive periods are based on the same threat or threats – National legislation requiring, on pain of a penalty, a passport or identity card to be presented when the internal border control is carried out – Non-compliance of such an obligation with Article 25(4) of the Schengen Borders Code when the border control itself is contrary to that provision.#Case C-368/20.cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24034Case C-654/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Sofia — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against VD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Transport — Directive 2006/126/EC — Driving licences — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 49 — Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties — Driving a vehicle during the period of suspension of the driving licence — Penalties — Factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Absence of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24035Case C-508/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — RM v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Freedom to provide services — Article 56 TFEU — Games of chance — Provision of prohibited lotteries — Penalties — Proportionality — Fines of a minimum amount — Overlapping — No ceiling — Alternative penalty involving deprivation of liberty — Proportionate contribution to the costs of the proceedings — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 49(3))cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24036Joined Cases C-368/20 and C-369/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — NW v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark (C-368/20), Bezirkshauptmannschaft Leibnitz (C-369/20) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Free movement of persons — Regulation (EU) 2016/399 — Schengen Borders Code — Article 25(4) — Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders for a maximum total duration of six months — National legislation providing for a number of successive periods of border control resulting in that duration being exceeded — Non-compliance of such legislation with Article 25(4) of the Schengen Borders Code where the successive periods are based on the same threat or threats — National legislation requiring, on pain of a penalty, a passport or identity card to be presented when the internal border control is carried out — Non-compliance of such an obligation with Article 25(4) of the Schengen Borders Code when the border control itself is contrary to that provision)cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24037Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Directive (EU) 2019/790 – Article 17(4), point (b), and point (c), in fine – Article 11 and Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom of expression and information – Protection of intellectual property – Obligations imposed on online content-sharing service providers – Prior automatic review (filtering) of content uploaded by users.#Case C-401/19.cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24038Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Directive (EU) 2019/790 – Article 17(4), point (b), and point (c), in fine – Article 11 and Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom of expression and information – Protection of intellectual property – Obligations imposed on online content-sharing service providers – Prior automatic review (filtering) of content uploaded by users.#Case C-401/19.cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24039Case C-401/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022 — Republic of Poland v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Directive (EU) 2019/790 — Article 17(4), point (b), and point (c), in fine — Article 11 and Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Freedom of expression and information — Protection of intellectual property — Obligations imposed on online content-sharing service providers — Prior automatic review (filtering) of content uploaded by users)cjeu_case · April 26, 2022
24040Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands.#Application for interpretation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-395/17 INT.cjeu_case · April 26, 2022