23881Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#'Piltenes meži' SIA v Lauku atbalsta dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Support for rural development by the EAFRD – Article 30 – Natura 2000 payments – Scope – Application for aid in respect of a micro-reserve created in a forest that is not part of the Natura 2000 network, with the purpose of protecting a species of wild bird – Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 – Block exemption for certain types of aid to the agriculture and forestry sectors – Application to aid co-financed by means of EU resources – No application to undertakings in difficulty.#Case C-251/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23882Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#'Nikopolis AD Istrum 2010' and 'Agro – EKO 2013' EOOD v Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond 'Zemedelie'.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Payments to beneficiaries – Article 75 – Time limit for payments – Compliance – None – Tacit refusal of the application for aid.#Joined Cases C-160/21 and C-217/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23883Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#'Nikopolis AD Istrum 2010' and 'Agro – EKO 2013' EOOD v Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond 'Zemedelie'.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Payments to beneficiaries – Article 75 – Time limit for payments – Compliance – None – Tacit refusal of the application for aid.#Joined Cases C-160/21 and C-217/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23884Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#UAB 'Romega' v Valstybinė maisto ir veterinarijos tarnyba.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food law – Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 – Microbiological criteria for foodstuffs – Article 1 – Annex I – Fresh poultry meat – Checks by the competent national authorities for the presence of the salmonella serotypes listed in point 1.28 of Chapter 1 of that annex – Checks for the presence of other pathogenic microorganisms – Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 – Article 14(8) – Discretion of the national authorities – Scope.#Case C-89/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23885Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#UAB 'Romega' v Valstybinė maisto ir veterinarijos tarnyba.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food law – Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 – Microbiological criteria for foodstuffs – Article 1 – Annex I – Fresh poultry meat – Checks by the competent national authorities for the presence of the salmonella serotypes listed in point 1.28 of Chapter 1 of that annex – Checks for the presence of other pathogenic microorganisms – Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 – Article 14(8) – Discretion of the national authorities – Scope.#Case C-89/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23886Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León v Delia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 45 TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Equal treatment – National system for recognition of career development of healthcare professionals – Professional experience acquired in the health services of another Member State not taken into consideration – Obstacle.#Case C-86/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23887Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León v Delia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 45 TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Equal treatment – National system for recognition of career development of healthcare professionals – Professional experience acquired in the health services of another Member State not taken into consideration – Obstacle.#Case C-86/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23888Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#SIA 'PRODEX' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff headings – Subheading 4418 20 – Scope – Doors and their frames and thresholds – MDF panels and mouldings – First part of general rule 2(a) for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature – Incomplete or unfinished article – Definition.#Case C-72/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23889Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#SIA 'PRODEX' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff headings – Subheading 4418 20 – Scope – Doors and their frames and thresholds – MDF panels and mouldings – First part of general rule 2(a) for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature – Incomplete or unfinished article – Definition.#Case C-72/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23890Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG v HARTING Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG and Harting Electric GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 9(1) – European patent – Interim measures – Power of national judicial authorities to issue an interlocutory injunction to prevent an imminent infringement of an intellectual property right – National case-law dismissing applications for interim measures where the validity of the patent in question has not been confirmed, at the very least, by a decision given at first instance in opposition or invalidity proceedings – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-44/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23891Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG v HARTING Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG and Harting Electric GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 9(1) – European patent – Interim measures – Power of national judicial authorities to issue an interlocutory injunction to prevent an imminent infringement of an intellectual property right – National case-law dismissing applications for interim measures where the validity of the patent in question has not been confirmed, at the very least, by a decision given at first instance in opposition or invalidity proceedings – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-44/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23892Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 28 April 2022.#SIA 'Baltijas Starptautiskā Akadēmija' and SIA 'Stockholm School of Economics in Riga' v Latvijas Zinātnes padome.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa and Administratīvā apgabaltiesa.#References for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Point 83 of Article 2 – Direct and unconditional reference to EU law – Admissibility of the questions – Research and development and innovation aid – Concept of ‘research and knowledge-dissemination organisation’ – Higher education establishment carrying on economic and non-economic activities – Determination of the primary goal.#Joined Cases C-164/21 and C-318/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23893Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 28 April 2022.#Allianz Benelux SA v État belge, SPF Finances.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Directive 90/435/EEC – Article 4(1) – Exemption in favour of a parent company of the dividends paid by its subsidiary – Carrying over definitively taxed income surpluses to subsequent tax years – Absorption of a company with definitively taxed income surpluses by another company – National legislation limiting the transfer of those surpluses to the absorbing company.#Case C-295/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23894Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 28 April 2022.#ABLV Bank AS, in liquidation v Single Resolution Board (SRB).#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms – Single Resolution Fund – Annual contributions – Liquidation of a credit institution – Reimbursement of contributions paid – Pro rata temporis.#Case C-202/21 P.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23896Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 28 April 2022.#GM v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common asylum and immigration policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Withdrawal of the status – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Danger to national security – Position taken by a specialist authority – Access to the file.#Case C-159/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23897Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 28 April 2022.#Proximus NV v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data and protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 12 – Public telephone directories and directory enquiry services – Subscriber’s consent – Obligations of the provider of directories and of directory enquiry services – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 17 – Right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’) – Article 5(2) – Article 24 – Information obligations and responsibility of the controller.#Case C-129/21.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23898Case C-638/21: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov — Slovakia) — Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska v CI (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Scope — Legal relationship between a national radio broadcaster and a natural person who is subject to the radio fee — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23899Case C-804/21 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus — Finland) — C and CD v Syyttäjä (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 23(3) — Requirement of intervention on the part of the executing judicial authority — Article 6(2) — Police services — Not included — Force majeure — Concept — Legal obstacles to surrender — Legal actions brought by the requested person — Application for international protection — Not included — Article 23(5) — Expiry of the time limits provided for surrender — Consequences — Release — Obligation to adopt any other measure necessary to prevent absconding)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23900Case C-286/21: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2008/50/EC — Ambient air quality — Article 13(1) and Annex XI — Systematic and persistent exceedance of the limit values for micro particles (PM10) in certain zones in France — Article 23(1) — Annex XV — Exceedance period to be ‘as short as possible’ — Appropriate measures)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.