23741Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira v DSR – Montagem e Manutenção de Ascensores e Escadas Rolantes SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Rates – Temporary provisions for particular labour-intensive services – Point 2 of Annex IV – Renovation and repairing of private dwellings – Application of a reduced rate of VAT to repair and maintenance services for lifts in residential buildings.#Case C-218/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23742Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira v DSR – Montagem e Manutenção de Ascensores e Escadas Rolantes SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Rates – Temporary provisions for particular labour-intensive services – Point 2 of Annex IV – Renovation and repairing of private dwellings – Application of a reduced rate of VAT to repair and maintenance services for lifts in residential buildings.#Case C-218/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23743Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#R. en R. v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Annex II – Statutory management requirement 10 – Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009 – Article 55, first paragraph and first sentence of second paragraph – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Reduction or exclusion of support received under the CAP in whole or in part – Non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules – Use of a plant protection product which is not or is no longer authorised in the Member State concerned and, in the latter scenario, the use-by date of which has expired.#Case C-189/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23744Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#R. en R. v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Annex II – Statutory management requirement 10 – Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009 – Article 55, first paragraph and first sentence of second paragraph – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Reduction or exclusion of support received under the CAP in whole or in part – Non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules – Use of a plant protection product which is not or is no longer authorised in the Member State concerned and, in the latter scenario, the use-by date of which has expired.#Case C-189/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23745Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#absoluts-bikes and more- GmbH & Co. KG v the-trading-company GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 6(1)(m) – Distance contract between a consumer and a trader – Obligation of the trader to inform the consumer of the existence and the conditions of a manufacturer’s commercial guarantee – Conditions under which such an obligation arises – Content of the information to be provided to the consumer about the manufacturer’s commercial guarantee – Impact of Article 6(2) of Directive 1999/44/EC.#Case C-179/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23746Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#absoluts-bikes and more- GmbH & Co. KG v the-trading-company GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 6(1)(m) – Distance contract between a consumer and a trader – Obligation of the trader to inform the consumer of the existence and the conditions of a manufacturer’s commercial guarantee – Conditions under which such an obligation arises – Content of the information to be provided to the consumer about the manufacturer’s commercial guarantee – Impact of Article 6(2) of Directive 1999/44/EC.#Case C-179/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23747Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#HJ v Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2008/94/EC – Protection of employees in the event of their employer’s insolvency – Article 2(2) – Concept of ‘employee’ – Article 12(a) and (c) – Limitations on the responsibility of the guarantee institutions – Person exercising, on the basis of a contract of employment entered into with a trading company, the functions of a management board member and chief executive officer of that company – Concurrent exercise of functions – National case-law refusing that person the benefit of the guarantees laid down by that directive.#Case C-101/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23748Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#HJ v Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2008/94/EC – Protection of employees in the event of their employer’s insolvency – Article 2(2) – Concept of ‘employee’ – Article 12(a) and (c) – Limitations on the responsibility of the guarantee institutions – Person exercising, on the basis of a contract of employment entered into with a trading company, the functions of a management board member and chief executive officer of that company – Concurrent exercise of functions – National case-law refusing that person the benefit of the guarantees laid down by that directive.#Case C-101/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23749Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 5 May 2022.#KP v TV and Gemeinde Bodman-Ludwigshafen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade marks – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 124(a) and (d) – Article 128 – Jurisdiction of EU trade mark courts – Action for infringement – Counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Withdrawal of the action for infringement – Outcome of the counterclaim – Autonomous nature of the counterclaim.#Case C-256/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23750Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 5 May 2022.#UAB 'HA.EN.' v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Right to deduct input VAT – Sale of an item of immovable property between taxable persons – Vendor subject to insolvency proceedings – National practice under which the purchaser is denied the right of deduction on the ground that he or she knew or should have known of the vendor’s difficulties in paying the output tax – Fraud and abuse of rights – Conditions.#Case C-227/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23751Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 5 May 2022.#LB v TO.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – Allowance in lieu of leave not taken after the termination of the employment relationship – Three-year limitation period – Starting point – Adequate information provided to the worker.#Case C-120/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23752Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 5 May 2022.#Iveco Orecchia SpA v APAM Esercizio SpA and Brescia Trasporti SpA.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#References for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Motor vehicles – Directive 2007/46/EC – Technical specifications – Offer to supply spare parts equivalent to the originals of a specific mark – Absence of proof of type-approval – Declaration of equivalence to the original by the tenderer – Concept of ‘manufacturer’ – Means of proof – Public procurement – Directive 2014/25/EU.#Joined Cases C-68/21 and C-84/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23754Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 5 May 2022.#JP v Ministre de la Transition écologique and Premier ministre.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Versailles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directives 80/779/EEC, 85/203/EEC, 96/62/EC, 1999/30/EC and 2008/50/EC – Air quality – Limit values for microparticles (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) – Exceeded – Air quality plans – Damage caused to an individual on account of deterioration of the air resulting from the exceedance of those limit values – Liability of the Member State concerned – Conditions for establishing that liability – Requirement that the rule of EU law infringed be intended to confer rights on the individuals who have been harmed – No such intention.#Case C-61/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23755Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 5 May 2022.#RegioJet a. s. v České dráhy a.s. and.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Directive 2014/104/EU – Articles 5 and 6 – Disclosure of evidence – Evidence in a competition authority’s file – Proceedings relating to an infringement of competition rules pending before the European Commission – National proceedings relating to an action for damages with regard to the same infringement – Conditions for the disclosure of evidence.#Case C-57/21.cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23756Case C-346/21: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto — Portugal) — ING Luxembourg SA v VX (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters — Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents — Regulation (CE) No 1393/2007 — Article 8 — Informing the addressee, by means of the standard form in Annex II to that regulation, of his or her right to refuse to accept a judicial document which is not written in or accompanied by a translation into a language which the addressee understands or into the official language or one of the official languages of the Member State addressed — Failure to use the standard form — Consequences)cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23757Case C-218/21: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira v DSR — Montagem e Manutenção de Ascensores e Escadas Rolantes SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Rates — Temporary provisions for particular labour-intensive services — Point 2 of Annex IV — Renovation and repairing of private dwellings — Application of a reduced rate of VAT to repair and maintenance services for lifts in residential buildings)cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23758Case C-189/21: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — R. en R. v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy (CAP) — Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Annex II — Statutory management requirement 10 — Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009 — Article 55, first paragraph and first sentence of second paragraph — Direct support schemes — Common rules — Reduction or exclusion of support received under the CAP in whole or in part — Non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules — Use of a plant protection product which is not or is no longer authorised in the Member State concerned and, in the latter scenario, the use-by date of which has expired)cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23759Case C-179/21: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — absoluts -bikes and more- GmbH & Co. KG v the-trading-company GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Article 6(1)(m) — Distance contract between a consumer and a trader — Obligation of the trader to inform the consumer of the existence and the conditions of a manufacturer’s commercial guarantee — Conditions under which such an obligation arises — Content of the information to be provided to the consumer about the manufacturer’s commercial guarantee — Impact of Article 6(2) of Directive 1999/44/EC)cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.
23760Case C-101/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — HJ v Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2008/94/EC — Protection of employees in the event of their employer’s insolvency — Article 2(2) — Concept of ‘employee’ — Article 12(a) and (c) — Limitations on the responsibility of the guarantee institutions — Person exercising, on the basis of a contract of employment entered into with a trading company, the functions of a management board member and chief executive officer of that company — Concurrent exercise of functions — National case-law refusing that person the benefit of the guarantees laid down by that directive)cjeu_case · 5 мая 2022 г.