23721Case T-253/22: Action brought on 9 May 2022 — Groschopp v EUIPO (Sustainability through Quality)cjeu_case · 9 mai 2022
23723Case C-324/22 P: Appeal brought on 9 May 2022 by Union nationale des indépendants solidaires (UNIS) against the order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 8 March 2022 in Case T-431/21 UNIS v Commissioncjeu_case · 9 mai 2022
23724Case C-317/22 P: Appeal brought on 9 May 2022 by Ahmad Aziz against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 5 May 2022 in Case T-808/21, Aziz v EEAScjeu_case · 9 mai 2022
23725Case C-315/22 P: Appeal brought on 9 May 2022 by Ahmad Aziz against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 5 May 2022 in Case T-789/21, Aziz v EEAScjeu_case · 9 mai 2022
23726Case C-303/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně (Czech Republic) lodged on 9 May 2022 — CROSS Zlín a.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěžecjeu_case · 9 mai 2022
23727Case C-306/22 P: Appeal brought on 8 May 2022 by Nigar Kirimova against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 9 March 2022 in Case T-727/20, Kirimova v EUIPOcjeu_case · 8 mai 2022
23729Case T-250/22: Action brought on 6 May 2022 — Indetec v Commission and Otherscjeu_case · 6 mai 2022
23732Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 May 2022.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-65/22 P.cjeu_case · 6 mai 2022
23733Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 May 2022.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-65/22 P.cjeu_case · 6 mai 2022
23734Case C-305/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 6 May 2022 — criminal proceedings against C.J.cjeu_case · 6 mai 2022
23735Case T-374/21: Order of the General Court of 6 May 2022 — documentus Deutschland v EUIPO — Reisswolf (REISSWOLF) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 6 mai 2022
23736Case C-321/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 5 May 2022 — ZL, KU, KM v Provident Polska S.A.cjeu_case · 5 mai 2022
23737Case C-296/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 5 May 2022 — A.T.U. Auto-Teile-Unger GmbH & Co. KG and Carglass GmbH v FCA Italy SpAcjeu_case · 5 mai 2022
23738Case T-248/21: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2022 — Fibrecycle v EUIPO — (BACK-2-NATURE) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 5 mai 2022
23739Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#ING Luxembourg SA v VX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Article 8 – Informing the addressee, by means of the standard form in Annex II to that regulation, of his or her right to refuse to accept a judicial document which is not written in or accompanied by a translation into a language which the addressee understands or into the official language or one of the official languages of the Member State addressed – Failure to use the standard form – Consequences.#Case C-346/21.cjeu_case · 5 mai 2022
23740Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#ING Luxembourg SA v VX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Article 8 – Informing the addressee, by means of the standard form in Annex II to that regulation, of his or her right to refuse to accept a judicial document which is not written in or accompanied by a translation into a language which the addressee understands or into the official language or one of the official languages of the Member State addressed – Failure to use the standard form – Consequences.#Case C-346/21.cjeu_case · 5 mai 2022