Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
23302

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Guangxi Xin Fu Yuan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in China – Review investigation – Circumvention – Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Related companies – Procedural obligations – Article 5(10) and (11) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Articles 6.1, 6.2 and 12.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement – Rights of the defence – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-144/20.

cjeu_case ·
23303

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Guangxi Xin Fu Yuan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in China – Review investigation – Circumvention – Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Related companies – Procedural obligations – Article 5(10) and (11) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Articles 6.1, 6.2 and 12.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement – Rights of the defence – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-144/20.

cjeu_case ·
23306

Case T-144/20: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Guangxi Xin Fu Yuan v Commission (Dumping — Imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in China — Review investigation — Circumvention — Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Related companies — Procedural obligations — Article 5(10) and (11) of Regulation 2016/1036 — Articles 6.1, 6.2 and 12.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement — Rights of the defence — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
23307

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 June 2022.#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and ITV plc v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the United Kingdom in favour of certain multinational groups – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Advance tax rulings – Tax regime relating to the financing of groups and concerning in particular controlled foreign companies – Selective tax advantages.#Cases T-363/19 and T-456/19.

cjeu_case ·
23308

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 June 2022.#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the United Kingdom in favour of certain multinational groups – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Advance tax rulings – Tax regime relating to the financing of groups and concerning in particular controlled foreign companies – Selective tax advantages.#Case T-363/19.

cjeu_case ·
23309

Case T-363/19 and T-456/19: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — United Kingdom and ITV v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme implemented by the United Kingdom in favour of certain multinational groups — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid paid — Advance tax rulings — Tax regime relating to the financing of groups and concerning in particular controlled foreign companies — Selective tax advantages)

cjeu_case ·
23315

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 7 June 2022.#Magic Box Int. Toys SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-194/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
23316

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 7 June 2022.#Magic Box Int. Toys SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-194/22 P.

cjeu_case ·