Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

23281

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Vitronic Dr.-Ing. Stein Bildverarbeitungssysteme GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Enforcement Trailer – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-433/21.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23282

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Vitronic Dr.-Ing. Stein Bildverarbeitungssysteme GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Enforcement Trailer – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-433/21.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23283

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Polo Club Düsseldorf GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark POLO CLUB DÜSSELDORF EST. 1976 – Earlier national figurative mark POLO CLUB – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-355/21.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23284

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Polo Club Düsseldorf GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark POLO CLUB, DÜSSELDORF EST. 1976 – Earlier national figurative mark POLO CLUB – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-355/21.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23285

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2022 (Extracts).#Ulrike Muschaweck v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark UM – Genuine use of the mark – Use with the consent of the proprietor – Use in the form in which the mark was registered – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Representation by the proprietor of the trade mark – Evidence of use submitted within the time limit set.#Case T-293/21.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23286

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2022 (Extracts).#Ulrike Muschaweck v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark UM – Genuine use of the mark – Use with the consent of the proprietor – Use in the form in which the mark was registered – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Representation by the proprietor of the trade mark – Evidence of use submitted within the time limit set.#Case T-293/21.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23287

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Darment Oy v European Commission.#Environment – Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 – Fluorinated greenhouse gases – Electronic registry for quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons on the market – Decision to register – Authorisation to use a quota – Compliance with a judgment of the General Court – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-92/21.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23288

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Darment Oy v European Commission.#Environment – Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 – Fluorinated greenhouse gases – Electronic registry for quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons on the market – Decision to register – Authorisation to use a quota – Compliance with a judgment of the General Court – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-92/21.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23289

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Apple Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – Earlier EU word marks THINK DIFFERENT – No genuine use of the marks – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-26/21 to T-28/21.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23290

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Apple Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – Earlier EU word marks THINK DIFFERENT – No genuine use of the marks – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-26/21 to T-28/21.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23291

Case T-744/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Medela v EUIPO (MAXFLOW) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark MAXFLOW — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23292

Case T-433/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Vitronic v EUIPO (Enforcement Trailer) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Enforcement Trailer — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23293

Case T-355/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Polo Club Düsseldorf v EUIPO — Company Bridge and Life (POLO CLUB DÜSSELDORF EST. 1976) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark POLO CLUB, DÜSSELDORF EST. 1976 — Earlier national figurative mark POLO CLUB — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23294

Case T-293/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Muschaweck v EUIPO — Conze (UM) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark UM — Genuine use of the mark — Use with the consent of the proprietor — Use in the form in which the mark was registered — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Representation by the proprietor of the trade mark — Evidence of use submitted within the time limit set)

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23295

Case T-92/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Darment v Commission (Environment — Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 — Fluorinated greenhouse gases — Electronic registry for quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons on the market — Decision to register — Authorisation to use a quota — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Principle of sound administration)

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23296

Case T-26/21 to T-28/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Apple v EUIPO — Swatch (THINK DIFFERENT) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Earlier EU word marks THINK DIFFERENT — No genuine use of the marks — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23297

Case C-657/21: Order of the President of the Court of 8 June 2022 — European Parliament v European Commission

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23298

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Deutschtec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark HOLUX – Earlier international registration in respect of the word mark HOLUX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8 (1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-738/20.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23299

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Deutschtec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark HOLUX – Earlier international registration in respect of the word mark HOLUX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-738/20.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022

23300

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#EMCS ltd. v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Provision of temporary agency workers for EASO – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Equal treatment – Principle of transparency – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-621/20.

cjeu_case · 8 juin 2022