Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
23161

Case C-698/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 — Sony Optiarc Inc., Sony Optiarc America Inc. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Optical disk drives — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 — Single and continuous infringement — Definition — Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers)

cjeu_case ·
23162

Case C-697/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 — Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Optical disk drives — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 — Single and continuous infringement — Definition — Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers)

cjeu_case ·
23163

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 15 June 2022.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, coherence or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-121/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
23164

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 15 June 2022.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, coherence or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-121/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
23174

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#F I S I Fibre sintetiche SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ECODOWN – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-338/21.

cjeu_case ·
23175

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#F I S I Fibre sintetiche SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ECODOWN – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-338/21.

cjeu_case ·
23178

Case T-338/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — F I S I v EUIPO — Verband der Deutschen Daunen- und Federnindustrie (ECODOWN) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark ECODOWN — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·